Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 39–45 | Cite as

Surgeon’s Volume Is Not Associated with Complication Outcome After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  • Sandra C. DonkervoortEmail author
  • Lea M. Dijksman
  • Pieter G. Versluis
  • Emile A. Clous
  • Anco C. Vahl
Original Article

Abstract

Aim

Complication rates after laparoscopic cholecystectomy vary but are still reported to be up to 17 %. Identifying risk factors for an adverse complication outcome could help to reduce morbidity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our aim was to analyze whether surgeon volume is a vital issue for complication outcome.

Methods

All complications—minor, major, local and general—were reviewed in a single institution between January 2004 and December 2008 and recorded in a database. Patient’s variables, disease related variables and surgeon’s variables were noted. The role of surgeon’s individual volume per year was analyzed. A stepwise logistic regression model was used.

Results

A total of 942 patients were analyzed, among which 70 (7 %) patients with acute cholecystitis and 52 (6 %) patients with delayed surgery for acute cholecystitis. Preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) had been performed in 142 (15 %) patients. Complication rates did not differ significantly for surgeon’s individual volume (≤10 vs. >10 LC/year, 5.2 vs. 8.2 %, p = 0.203) nor for specialization (laparoscopic vs. non-laparoscopic; 9.2 vs. 6.4 %, p = 0.085) and experience (specialty registration ≤5 vs. >5 years; 5.1 vs. 8.7 %, p = 0.069). The only significant predictors for complications were acute surgery (OR 3.9, 95 % CI 1.8–8.7, p = 0.001) and a history preceding laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (ERC and delayed surgery for cholecystitis) (OR 8.1, 95 % CI 4.5–14.6: p <0.001).

Conclusion

Complications after LC were not significantly associated with a surgeon’s individual volume, but most prominently determined by the type of biliary disease.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Complication outcome Volume 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138:721–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF. Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:73–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1996;224:609–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2001;234:750–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:158–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Reuver PR, Grossmann I, Busch OR, Obertop H, van Gulik TM, Gouma DJ. Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury. Ann Surg. 2007;245:763–770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th ID, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:723–728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murphy MM, Shah SA, Simons JP, et al. Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1929–1936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG. Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc. 2005;19:996–1001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donkervoort SC, Dijksman LM, de Nes LC, Versluis PG, Derksen J, Gerhards MF. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon’s selection needed? Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2360–2366.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boddy AP, Bennett JM, Ranka S, Rhodes M. Who should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A 10-year audit. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1492–1497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC. Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2006;93:844–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kortram K, Reinders JS, Van RB, Wiezer MJ, Go PM, Boerma D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis should be performed by a laparoscopic surgeon. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2206–2209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donkervoort SC, Van RO, Dijksman LM, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG. Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:798–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dindo D, Dermartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brune IB, Schonleben K, Omran S. Complications after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy: a comparative study. HPB Surg. 1994;8:19–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg. 2008;32:2230–2236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shamiyeh A, Danis J, Wayand W, Zehetner J. A 14-year analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion—when and why? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:271–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1362–1365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hasukic S, Mesic D, Dizdarevic E, Keser D, Hadziselimovic S, Bazardzanovic M. Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:163–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg. 2000;166:394–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra C. Donkervoort
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lea M. Dijksman
    • 2
  • Pieter G. Versluis
    • 1
  • Emile A. Clous
    • 1
  • Anco C. Vahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryOnze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Teaching HospitalOnze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations