Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 1293–1298 | Cite as

Prior Endoscopy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Celiac Disease: A Missed Opportunity?

  • Benjamin Lebwohl
  • Govind Bhagat
  • Sarah Markoff
  • Suzanne K. Lewis
  • Scott Smukalla
  • Alfred I. Neugut
  • Peter H. R. Green
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Celiac disease (CD) is under-diagnosed in the United States, and factors related to the performance of endoscopy may be contributory.

Aim

To identify newly diagnosed patients with CD who had undergone a prior esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and examine factors contributing to the missed diagnosis.

Methods

We identified all patients age ≥18 years whose diagnosis of CD was made by endoscopy with biopsy at our institution (n = 316), and searched the medical record for a prior EGD. We compared those patients with a prior EGD to those with without a prior EGD with regard to age at diagnosis and gender, and enumerated the indications for EGD.

Results

Of the 316 patients diagnosed by EGD with biopsy at our center, 17 (5 %) had previously undergone EGD. During the prior non-diagnostic EGD, a duodenal biopsy was not performed in 59 % of the patients, and ≥4 specimens (the recommended number) were submitted in only 29 % of the patients. On the diagnostic EGD, ≥4 specimens were submitted in 94 %. The mean age of diagnosis of those with missed/incident CD was 53.1 years, slightly older than those diagnosed with CD on their first EGD (46.8 years, p = 0.11). Both groups were predominantly female (missed/incident CD: 65 vs. 66 %, p = 0.94).

Conclusions

Among 17 CD patients who had previously undergone a non-diagnostic EGD, non-performance of duodenal biopsy during the prior EGD was the dominant feature. Routine performance of duodenal biopsy during EGD for the indications of dyspepsia and reflux may improve CD diagnosis rates.

Keywords

Celiac disease Endoscopy Biopsy Diagnosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, et al. Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:88–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray JA, Van Dyke C, Plevak MF, Dierkhising RA, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ III. Trends in the identification and clinical features of celiac disease in a North American community, 1950–2001. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:19–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katz KD, Rashtak S, Lahr BD, et al. Screening for celiac disease in a North American population: sequential serology and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1333–1339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med. 2010;42:530–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, Murray JA, Everhart JE. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1538–1544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Catassi C, Kryszak D, Louis-Jacques O, et al. Detection of celiac disease in primary care: a multicenter case-finding study in North America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1454–1460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arguelles-Grande C, Tennyson CA, Lewis SK, Green PH, Bhagat G. Variability in small bowel histopathology reporting between different pathology practice settings: impact on the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:242–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lebwohl B, Tennyson CA, Holub JL, Lieberman DA, Neugut AI, Green PH. Sex and racial disparities in duodenal biopsy to evaluate for celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:779–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebwohl B, Kapel RC, Neugut AI, Green PH, Genta RM. Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catassi C, Fabiani E, Ratsch IM, et al. The coeliac iceberg in Italy. A multicentre antigliadin antibodies screening for coeliac disease in school-age subjects. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1996;412:29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Virta LJ, Kaukinen K, Collin P. Incidence and prevalence of diagnosed coeliac disease in Finland: results of effective case finding in adults. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:933–938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher ES, Welch HG. Could more health care lead to worse health? Hosp Pract (Minneap) 1999;34:15–16, 21–22.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lieberman D, Fennerty MB, Morris CD, Holub J, Eisen G, Sonnenberg A. Endoscopic evaluation of patients with dyspepsia: results from the national endoscopic data repository. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1067–1075.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green PH, Murray JA. Routine duodenal biopsies to exclude celiac disease? Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:92–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ford AC, Ching E, Moayyedi P. Meta-analysis: yield of diagnostic tests for coeliac disease in dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collin P, Mustalahti K, Kyronpalo S, Rasmussen M, Pehkonen E, Kaukinen K. Should we screen reflux oesophagitis patients for coeliac disease? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:917–920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nachman F, Vazquez H, Gonzalez A, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with celiac disease and the effects of a gluten-free diet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:214–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leffler DA, Kelly CP. Celiac disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease: yet another presentation for a clinical chameleon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:192–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hershcovici T, Leshno M, Goldin E, Shamir R, Israeli E. Cost effectiveness of mass screening for coeliac disease is determined by time-delay to diagnosis and quality of life on a gluten-free diet. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:901–910.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickey W, Hughes D. Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2126–2128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leffler DA, Schuppan D. Update on serologic testing in celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2520–2524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harewood GC, Holub JL, Lieberman DA. Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1790–1794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abrams JA, Diamond B, Rotterdam H, Green PH. Seronegative celiac disease: increased prevalence with lesser degrees of villous atrophy. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:546–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giangreco E, D’Agate C, Barbera C, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in adult patients with refractory functional dyspepsia: value of routine duodenal biopsy. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6948–6953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Lebwohl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Govind Bhagat
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sarah Markoff
    • 1
  • Suzanne K. Lewis
    • 1
  • Scott Smukalla
    • 1
  • Alfred I. Neugut
    • 2
  • Peter H. R. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Celiac Disease Center at Columbia UniversityColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and Cell BiologyColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations