Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 57, Issue 12, pp 3286–3292 | Cite as

Comparison of Three Types of Precut Technique to Achieve Common Bile Duct Cannulation: A Retrospective Analysis of 274 Cases

  • Panagiotis Katsinelos
  • Stergios Gkagkalis
  • Grigoris Chatzimavroudis
  • Athanasios Beltsis
  • Sotiris Terzoudis
  • Christos Zavos
  • Anthi Gatopoulou
  • Georgia Lazaraki
  • Themistoklis Vasiliadis
  • Jannis Kountouras
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the success rate and complications of three precut techniques of sphincterotomy after failure of conventional techniques of cannulation of common bile duct (CBD).

Patients and Methods

Between January 2003 and October 2011, 2,903 consecutive ERCPs were performed in patients with naïve major papilla. In 283 patients in whom biliary cannulation was not achieved, precut technique was performed and these patients were included in the study.

Results

A total of 274 patients were included in the final analysis. Needle-knife papillotomy (NKP) was performed in 129 cases (47.1 %), suprapapillary fistulotomy (SPF) in 78 patients (28.5 %), and transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) in 67 cases (24.5 %). No significant difference was observed in the initial and eventual success rate of biliary cannulation between the three groups. Overall, complications occurred in 54 patients (19.7 %), of which 33 (25.6 %) were with NKP, 6 (7.7 %) with SPF and 15 (22.4 %) with TPS, respectively, a difference statistically significant favoring the SPF group (p = 0.006). Post-procedure acute pancreatitis was developed in 27 cases (20.9 %) with NKP, compared to two cases (2.6 %) with SPF and 15 cases (22.4 %) with TPS, a difference statistically significant favoring the SPF group. No difference was observed between the groups with regard to the occurrence of post-procedure hemorrhage and perforation.

Conclusions

The three types of precut sphincterotomy have no different overall CBD cannulation rates; SPF reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis risk.

Keywords

Precut technique Needle-knife papillotomy Suprapapillary fistulotomy Transpancreatic sphincterotomy 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Nothing to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:112–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sriram PV, Rao GV, Nageshwar Reddy D. The precut-when, where and how? A review. Endoscopy. 2003;35:S24–S30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Risk factor for complications following ERCP: results of a large-scale prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007;39:793–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, Petoumenos C, Nakos A, Karvountzis G. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillototmy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:334–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catalano MF, Linder JD, Geenen JE. Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard precut papillototmy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:557–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halttumen J, Keranen I, Udd M, Kylanpaa L. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle-knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:745–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang P, Zhang W, Liu ZS, et al. Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:697–704.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1113–1118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman M, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:425–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:139–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carr-Locke DL. Is primary precut endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy safe and effective? Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;4:364–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manes G, Di Giorgio P, Repici A, Macarri G, Ardizzone S, Porro GB. An analysis of the factors associated with the development of complications in patients undergoing precut sphincterotomy: a prospective controlled randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2412–2417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goff JS. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter precut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:642–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katsinelos P, Mimidis K, Paroutoglou G, et al. Needle-knife papillotomy: a safe and effective technique in experienced hands. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:349–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Jinnouchi K, Yoshida M, Adachi Y, Sagara K. Pancreatic sphincter precutting to gain selective access to the common bile duct: a series of 172 patients. Endoscopy. 2004;36:405–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kasmin FE, Cohen D, Batra S, Cohen SA, Siegel JH. Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Xu MD, et al. Application of needle-knife in difficult biliary cannulation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006;5:590–594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harewood GC, Baron TH. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1708–1712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Akaraviputh T, Lohsiriwat V, Swangsri J, Methasate A, Leelakusolvong S, Lertakayamanee N. The learning curve for safety and success of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a single endoscopist’s experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:513–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S, Kuran S, Sahin B. Early decision for precut sphincterotomy: is it a risky preference? Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:845–851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010;42:381–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis Katsinelos
    • 1
  • Stergios Gkagkalis
    • 1
  • Grigoris Chatzimavroudis
    • 1
  • Athanasios Beltsis
    • 1
  • Sotiris Terzoudis
    • 1
  • Christos Zavos
    • 2
  • Anthi Gatopoulou
    • 1
  • Georgia Lazaraki
    • 1
  • Themistoklis Vasiliadis
    • 1
  • Jannis Kountouras
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Endoscopy and Motility Unit, G. Gennimatas General Hospital, School of MedicineAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology, Second Medical ClinicAristotle University of Thessaloniki, Ippokration HospitalThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations