Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 713–719 | Cite as

Effects of a Lactobacillus reuteri BR11 Mutant Deficient in the Cystine-Transport System in a Rat Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  • Haydn L. Atkins
  • Mark S. Geier
  • Luca D. Prisciandaro
  • Ashok K. Pattanaik
  • Rebecca E. A. Forder
  • Mark S. Turner
  • Gordon S. HowarthEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract associated with altered composition of the gut microbiota. Lactobacillus reuteri BR11 (BR11) has recently been reported to reduce the severity of experimental IBD because of its probiotic properties possibly attributed to a mechanism of thiol production via its unique cysteine/cystine-transport system.

Aim

We compared BR11 and a BR11 mutant deficient in the cystine-uptake system (PNG201), for their capacity to reduce the severity of experimental colitis.

Methods

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 8 per group) were gavaged (1 ml/day) with skim milk, BR11 or PNG201 (1 × 109 CFU/ml) for 12 days. Rats consumed either water or 2% dextran sulfate sodium in drinking water from days 6 to 12 to induce colitis. Metabolism data, disease activity index, intestinal mucin profile, and histological analyses were assessed and compared by ANOVA.

Results

Assessed histologically, DSS administration resulted in significant colonic deterioration, including loss of crypt area and increased damage severity. BR11 administration only partially alleviated the DSS effects, with a minor improvement in crypt area (P < 0.05). Administration of the PNG201 mutant strain to colitic animals failed to achieve significance (P > 0.05) against the DSS control for any of the end-points. However, the mutant strain induced significantly greater (P < 0.05) histological severity compared with BR11-treated colitic animals, indicative of possible exacerbation of colitis.

Conclusions

The cystine-uptake system only minimally affects the biological effects of BR11, as evidenced by histological and macroscopic colitic changes.

Keywords

Colon Dextran sulfate sodium Inflammatory bowel disease Lactobacillus reuteri Probiotic Ulcerative colitis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr Ashis Samanta and Kerry Lymn assisted in conducting the animal trials. Dr Roger Yazbek assisted in interpretation of results. This work was funded in-part by a grant from the Cancer Council South Australia and by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Professor Gordon Howarth is supported by the Sally Birch Cancer Council Australia Senior Research Fellowship in Cancer Control.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Hanauer SB. Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic opportunities. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:S3–S9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amit-Romach E, Uni Z, Reifen R. Therapeutic potential of two probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease as observed in the trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid model of colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1828–1836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shanahan F. Probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease: therapeutic rationale and role. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:809–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boudeau J, Glasser AL, Julien S, Colombel JF, Darfeuille-Michaud A. Inhibitory effect of probiotic escherichia coli strain nissle 1917 on adhesion to and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells by adherent-invasive e-coli strains isolated from patients with crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:45–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman TM, Plosker GL, Figgitt DP. Vsl #3 probiotic mixture: a review of its use in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Drugs. 2006;66:1371–1387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peran L, Sierra S, Comalada M, et al. A comparative study of the preventative effects exerted by two probiotics, Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus fermentum, in the trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid model of rat colitis. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:96–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seksik P, Dray X, Sokol H, Marteau P. Is there any place for alimentary probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease? Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:906–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanderpool C, Yan F, Polk DB. Mechanisms of probiotic action: implications for therapeutic applications in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflam Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1585–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geier MS, Butler RN, Howarth GS. Inflammatory bowel disease: current insights into pathogenesis and new therapeutic options; probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;115:1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahida YR, Rolfe VE. Host-bacterial interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Sci. 2004;107:331–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rioux KP, Madsen KL, Fedorak RN. The role of enteric microflora in inflammatory bowel disease: human, animal studies with probiotics, prebiotics. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2005;34:465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Amit-Romach E, Uni Z, Reifen R. Mulistep mechanism of probiotic bacterium, the effect on innate immune system. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54:277–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Turner MS, Woodberry T, Hafner LM, Gliffard PM. The bspA locus of Lactobacillus fermentum BR11 encodes an l-cystine uptake system. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:2192–2198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Geier MS, Butler RN, Giffard PM, Howarth GS. Lactobacillus fermentum BR11, a potential new probiotic, alleviates symptoms of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium (dss) in rats. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;114:267–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lo R, Turner MS, Barry DG, Sreekumar R, Walsh TP, Gliffard PM. Cystathionine gamma-lyase is a component of cystine-mediated oxidative defense in Lactobacillus reuteri BR11. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:1827–1837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turner MS, Timms P, Hafner LM, Gliffard PM. Identification and characterization of a basic cell surface-located protein from Lactobacillus fermentum BR11. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:3310–3316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Javed S, Howard A, Hirst B. Protection of intestinal cells against reactive oxygen species (ros) by amino acids. Mutagenesis. 2009;24:38.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Damiani CR, Benetton CAF, Stoffel C, et al. Oxidative stress and metabolism in animal model of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1846–1851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sengul N, Isik S, Aslim B, Ucar G, Demirbag AE. The effect of exopolysaccharide-producing probiotic strains on gut oxidative damage in experimental colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:707–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hung J, Turner MS, Walsh T, Giffard PM. Bspa (CyuC) in Lactobacillus reuteri BR11 is a highly expressed high-affinity l-cystine-binding protein. Curr Microbiol. 2005;50:33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hung J, Cooper D, Turner MS, Walsh T, Giffard PM. Cystine uptake prevents production of hydrogen peroxide by Lactobacillus fermentum BR11. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;227:93–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rush CM, Hafner LM, Timms P. Genetic-modification of a vaginal strain of lactobacillus fermentum and its maintenance within the reproductive-tract after intravaginal administration. J Med Microbiol. 1994;41:272–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomas FM, Knowles SE, Owens PC, et al. Effects of full-length and truncated insulin-like growth factor-i on nitrogen-balance and muscle protein-metabolism in nitrogen-restricted rats. J Endocrinol. 1991;128:97–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Howarth GS, Xian CJ, Read LC. Predisposition to colonic dysplasia is unaffected by continuous administration of insulin-like growth factor-i for 20 weeks in a rat model of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Growth Fact. 2000;18:119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howarth GS, Xian CJ, Read LC. Insulin-like growth factor-1 partially attenuates colonic damage in rats with experimental colitis induced by oral dextran sulphate sodium. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:180–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaudio E, Taddei G, Vetuschi A, et al. Dextran sulfate sodium (dss) colitis in rats: clinical, structural, and ultrastructural aspects. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:1458–1475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Howarth GS, Francis GL, Cool JC, Xu X, Byard RW, Read LC. Milk growth factors enriched from cheese whey ameliorate intestinal damage by methotrexate when administered orally to rats. J Nutr. 1996;126:2519–2530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Longman RJ, Poulson R, Corfield AP, Warren BF, Wright NA, Thomas MG. Alterations in the composition of the supramucosal defense barrier in relation to disease severity of ulcerative colitis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54:1335–1348.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Corfield AP, Myerscough N, Bradfield N, et al. Colonic mucins in ulcerative colitis: evidence for loss of sulfation. Glycoconj J. 1996;13:809–822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forder REA, Howarth GS, Tivey DR, Hughes RJ. Bacterial modulation of small intestinal goblet cells and mucin composition during early posthatch development of poultry. Poult Sci. 2007;86:2396–2403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yan YT, Kolachala V, Dalmasso G, et al. Temporal, spatial analysis of clinical, molecular parameters in dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis. Plos One. 2009;4:e6073.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vetuschi A, Latella G, Sferra R, Caprilli R, Gaudio E. Increased proliferation and apoptosis of colonic epithelial cells in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:1447–1457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shimizu T, Suzuki M, Fujimura J, et al. The relationship between the concentration of dextran sodium sulfate and the degree of induced experimental colitis in weanling rats. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37:481–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mauger CA, Butler RN, Geier MS, Tooley KL, Howarth GS. Probiotic effects on 5-fluorouracil-induced mucositis assessed by the sucrose breath test in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:612–619.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Geier MS, Butler RN, Giffard PM, Howarth GS. Prebiotic and synbiotic fructooligosaccharide administration fails to reduce the severity of experimental colitis in rats. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1061–1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haydn L. Atkins
    • 1
  • Mark S. Geier
    • 1
    • 3
  • Luca D. Prisciandaro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ashok K. Pattanaik
    • 4
  • Rebecca E. A. Forder
    • 1
  • Mark S. Turner
    • 5
  • Gordon S. Howarth
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Children, Youth and Women’s Health Service (CYWHS)Centre for Paediatric and Adolescent GastroenterologyNorth AdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.PPPI Nutrition Research LaboratorySouth Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI)RoseworthyAustralia
  4. 4.Clinical and Pet Nutrition Laboratory, Division of Animal NutritionIndian Veterinary Research InstituteIzatnagarIndia
  5. 5.School of Agriculture and Food SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations