Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 720–725

Prospective Evaluation of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

  • Harry Aslanian
  • Bani Chander
  • Marie Robert
  • Dennis Cooper
  • Deborah Proctor
  • Stuart Seropian
  • Dhanpat Jain
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Severe GVHD carries significant morbidity and mortality and remains one of the leading causes of treatment failure. Unfortunately, intestinal GVHD may present with a variety of non-specific symptoms and diagnosis based on clinical presentation is often inaccurate; biopsy is therefore needed for definitive diagnosis. At present, the optimal endoscopic approach to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal GVHD remains uncertain.

Aims

The primary aims of our study were: (1) to evaluate the yield of upper versus lower endoscopy, and (2) to determine which anatomic regions were most likely to provide a histologic diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of 27 consecutive patients who had undergone stem cell transplantation within the past 100 days and were referred to the Yale Gastrointestinal Procedure center between August 2002 and February 2006 for the evaluation of suspected acute GVHD. All patients underwent standardized endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract with biopsies. The diagnostic yield of upper versus lower endoscopy was compared in all patients.

Results

GVHD was identified in 18 of the 27 patients (67%). Of those with GVHD, 15 patients (83%) had diffuse intestinal involvement. Six of 10 patients (60%) with an endoscopically normal EGD had GVHD on biopsies of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Six of 13 (46%) patients with an endoscopically normal appearing colonoscopy had GVHD on colonic biopsies. Two of 18 (11%) patients had isolated GVHD of the upper intestinal tract and 1 (6%) had isolated colonic GVHD. Rectal biopsy alone identified 89% (16 of 18) of GVHD cases and all 16 cases of GVHD with colonic involvement. A diagnosis of GVHD was not altered by the additional performance of biopsy of the proximal colon or terminal ileum.

Conclusions

In the present study, the majority of cases of acute GVHD demonstrate diffuse upper and lower gastrointestinal involvement with rectal, sigmoid, gastric and duodenal biopsies having similarly diagnostic yield. Based on our findings, we recommend starting with flexible sigmoidoscopy with rectal biopsy alone in patients who are poor candidates to undergo full colonoscopy with sedation or in those in whom GVHD is strongly suspected based on clinical findings. However, more extensive evaluations may be necessary to rule out infection and should be considered in those with no contraindications to sedation and in whom other differential diagnoses are also being considered.

Keywords

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) Bone marrow transplantation Endoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Storb R, Antin JH, Cutler C. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:S18–S27. Epub 9/24/2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrara JLM, Deeg HJ. Graft-versus host disease. NEJM. 1991;324:667–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appleton AL, Sviland L, Pearson EDJ, et al. The need for endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal graft-versus-host-disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;16:183–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roy J, Snover D, Weisdorf S, et al. Simultaneous upper and lower endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 1991;51:642–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox GJ, Matdui SM, Lo RS, et al. Etiology and outcome of diarrhea after marrow transplantation: A prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1398–1407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roy J, Snover D, Weisdorf S, et al. Simultaneous upper and lower endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 1991;51:642–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iqbal N, Salzman D, Lazenby A, Wilcox M. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Gastro. 2000;95:3034–3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thompson B, Salzman D, Steinhauer J, Lazenby A, Wilcox CM. Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ, et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: II Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12:31–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iqbal N, Salzman D, Lazenby A, Wilcox M. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Am J Gastro. 2000;95:3034–3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ross W, Ghosh S, Dekovich A, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease? Rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:982–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Epstein R, McDonald G, Sale G, Shulman H, Thomas E. The diagnostic accuracy of the rectal biopsy in acute graft-versus-host-disease: A prospective study of thirteen patients. Gastroenterology. 1980;78:764–771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cox GJ, Matdui SM, Lo RS, et al. Etiology and outcome of diarrhea after marrow transplantation: A prospective study. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1398–1407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu D, Hockenberry D, Brentnall T, et al. Persistent nausea and anorexia after marrow transplantation: A prospective study of 78 patients. Transplantation. 1998;66:1319–1324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roy J, Snover D, Weisdorf S, et al. Simultaneous upper and lower endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 1991;51:642–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson B, Salzman D, Steinhauer J, Lazenby A, Wilcox CM. Prospective endoscopic evaluation for gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: determination of the best diagnostic approach. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross W, Ghosh S, Dekovich A, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease? Rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:982–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross W, Ghosh S, Dekovich A, et al. Endoscopic biopsy diagnosis of acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease? Rectosigmoid biopsies are more sensitive than upper gastrointestinal biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:982–989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Aslanian
    • 1
  • Bani Chander
    • 1
  • Marie Robert
    • 2
  • Dennis Cooper
    • 3
  • Deborah Proctor
    • 1
  • Stuart Seropian
    • 3
  • Dhanpat Jain
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive DiseasesYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of PathologyYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations