Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 55, Issue 9, pp 2606–2613

Urinary and Fecal Incontinence After Bariatric Surgery

Original Article



Morbidly obese women have markedly high rates of urinary and fecal incontinence. Weight loss reduces prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence; however, the effect of weight loss on fecal incontinence is unknown.


The aim of this study was to document the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in subjects who underwent bariatric surgery and associated weight loss.


We mailed a detailed survey to all 404 adults who underwent bariatric surgery at the University of Wisconsin prior to May 2006. Type and severity of urinary and fecal incontinence was obtained using previously validated questionnaires. Perceived effect of surgery on bowel and bladder function was also assessed.


Forty-eight percent (193) of the surveys were returned. Urinary incontinence was reported in 72% of the women, 39% of whom perceived improvement after surgery. Only 21% of the men reported urinary incontinence. In contrast, fecal incontinence was common in both men and women; 48% of the women and 42% of the men reported liquid stool incontinence and 21% of the women and 30% of the men reported solid stool incontinence. Fifty-five percent of the women and 31% of the men with fecal incontinence perceived worsening after surgery. Women with diarrhea were four times more likely to report fecal incontinence (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, women who perceived worsening of diarrhea after surgery were significantly more likely to have fecal incontinence (P = 0.003).


Both fecal and urinary incontinence were common after bariatric surgery. Risk factors for fecal incontinence in women after bariatric surgery include diarrhea and worsening of diarrhea; we suggest that such surgery may uncover prior weaknesses in the continence mechanism.


Fecal incontinence Urinary incontinence Morbid obesity Bariatric surgery 


  1. 1.
    Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States–gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:6–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–1555.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Proceedings of the ASBS consensus conference on the state of bariatric surgery and morbid obesity: Health implications for patients, health professionals and third-party payers, Washington, DC, USA, May 6–7, 2004. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1:105–153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richter HE, Burgio KL, Clements RH, Goode PS, Redden DT, Varner RE. Urinary and anal incontinence in morbidly obese women considering weight loss surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1272–1277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fenner DE, Trowbridge ER, Patel DA, et al. Establishing the prevalence of incontinence study: racial differences in women’s patterns of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2008;179:1455–1460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, et al. Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:42–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greer WJ, Richter HE, Bartolucci AA, Burgio KL. Obesity and pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:341–349.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD. Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008;121:885–893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Subak LL, Johnson C, Whitcomb E, Boban D, Saxton J, Brown JS. Does weight loss improve incontinence in moderately obese women? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13:40–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burgio KL, Richter HE, Clements RH, Redden DT, Goode PS. Changes in urinary and fecal incontinence symptoms with weight loss surgery in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1034–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, Hermstad R, Vanvik A, Bratt H. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47:497–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S. A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19:137–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:520–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanley J, Capewell A, Hagen S. Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women. BMJ. 2001;322:1096–1097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murphy M, Culligan PJ, Arce CM, Graham CA, Blackwell L, Heit MH. Construct validity of the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:418–423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holroyd-Leduc JM, Tannenbaum C, Thorpe KE, Straus SE. What type of urinary incontinence does this woman have? JAMA. 2008;299:1446–1456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome II process. Gut. 1999;45(Suppl 2):II1–II5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44:77–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    te Riele WW, Vogten JM, Boerma D, Wiezer MJ, van Ramshorst B. Comparison of weight loss and morbidity after gastric bypass and gastric banding. A single center European experience. Obes Surg. 2008;18:11–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wasserberg N, Haney M, Petrone P, et al. Fecal incontinence among morbid obese women seeking for weight loss surgery: an underappreciated association with adverse impact on quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:493–497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen CC, Gatmaitan P, Koepp S, Barber MD, Chand B, Schauer PR, Brethauer SA. Obesity is associated with increased prevalence and severity of pelvic floor disorders in women considering bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2009;5:411–415.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aitola P, Lehto K, Fonsell R, Huhtala H. Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 30 years or more in general population. Colorectal Dis 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01878.x.
  23. 23.
    Kuruba R, Almahmeed T, Martinez F, Torrella TA, Haines K, Nelson LG, Gallagher SF, Murr MM. Bariatric surgery improves urinary incontinence in morbidly obese individuals. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007;3:586–590 (discussion 590–581).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–2693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica N. Roberson
    • 1
  • Jon C. Gould
    • 2
  • Arnold Wald
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Section of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations