Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 1221–1229 | Cite as

Can Endoscopic Ultrasound Predict Early Rectal Cancers That Can Be Resected Endoscopically? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

  • Srinivas R. Puli
  • Matthew L. Bechtold
  • Jyotsna B. K. Reddy
  • Abhishek Choudhary
  • Mainor R. Antillon
Review

Abstract

Background

Rectal cancers that are confined to the mucosa (T0) can be resected endoscopically. This can help the patient avoid transabdominal surgery. The published data on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to predict T0 stage of rectal cancers has been varied.

Aim

To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in T0 staging of rectal cancers.

Method (Study Selection Criteria)

Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. T0 was defined as tumor confined to the mucosa.

Data Collection and Extraction

Articles were searched in Medline, PubMed, and CENTRAL.

Statistical Method

Pooling was conducted by both the fixed-effects model and random-effects model.

Results

An initial search identified 3,360 reference articles. Of these, 339 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Eleven studies (N = 1,791) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing T0 was 97.3% (95% CI: 93.7–99.1). EUS had a pooled specificity of 96.3% (95% CI: 95.3–97.2). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 21.9 (95% CI: 16.3–29.7) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04–0.15). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed and random effect models, were similar. The P-value for Chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >0.10.

Conclusions

EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity, this helps accurately diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers. Over the past two decades, the sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers has remained high. This can help physicians offer endoscopic treatment to these patients, therefore EUS should be strongly considered for staging of early rectal cancers.

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound Rectal cancer Staging Meta-analysis Systematic review 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Cancer Institute. Surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER). US National Institutes of Health. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/results_merged/sect_06_colon_rectum.pdf .
  3. 3.
    Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(10):658–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(22):1679–1687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(5):327–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho E, Smith-Warner SA, Ritz J, et al. Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 cohort studies. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(8):603–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paskett ED, Reeves KW, Rohan TE, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(22):1729–1735. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donaldson G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer. 1983;52(7):1317–1329. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1317::AID-CNCR2820520731>3.0.CO;2-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Minsky BD, Mies C, Recht A, Rich TA, Chaffey JT. Resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid and rectum: patterns of failure and survival. Cancer. 1988;61(7):1408–1416. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880401)61:7<1408::AID-CNCR2820610722>3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willett CG, Lewandrowski K, Donelly S, Shellito PC, Convery K, Eliseo R. Compton CC. Are there patients with stage I rectal carcinoma at risk for failure after abdominoperineal resection? Cancer. 1992;69(7):1651–1655. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7<1651::AID-CNCR2820690703>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML, Diaz-Arias AA, Ibdah JA, Marshall JB. En Bloc submucosal Dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailey HR, Huval WV, Max E, Smith KW, Butts DR, Zamora LF. Local excision of carcinoma of the rectum for cure. Surgery. 1992;111(5):555–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kodner IJ, Gilley MT, Shemesh EI, Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Myerson RJ. Radiation therapy as definitive treatment for selected invasive rectal cancer. Surgery. 1993;114(4):850–856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mendenhall WM, Rout WR, Vauthey JN, Haigh LS, Zlotecki RA, Copeland EM III. Conservative treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with endocavitary irradiation or wide local excision and postoperative irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(10):3241–3248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim JC, Kim HC, Yu CS, et al. Efficacy of 3-dimensional endorectal ultrasonography compared with conventional ultrasonography and computed tomography in preoperative rectal cancer staging. Am J Surg. 2006;192:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2006;38(5):493–497. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsuda T, Saito Y, Uraoka T, et al. Therapeutic strategy for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the colorectum. Syokaki naisikyo. 2006;18:1151–1157.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nakajima K, Shin-ichi M, Aoki T, et al. Result of endoscopic resection and treatment strategy including operation for colorectal adenoma and early cancer of 20 mm or more in diameter. Prog Dig Endosc. 2006;68:67–72.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: Possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66(1):100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal lesion. Dig Endosc. 2004;16:S178–S181. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2004.00440.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Ishihara H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2007;39:423–427. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maingon P, Guerif S, Darsouni R, et al. Conservative management of rectal adenocarcinoma by radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40(5):1077–1085. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00948-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sleisenger and Fortran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Saunders, 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guinet C, Buy JN, Ghossain MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):385–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology. 1989;170(2):319–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Koch B, Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(10):863–868. doi: 10.1007/BF02051923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tio TL, Coene PP, van Delden OM, Tytgat GN. Colorectal carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology. 1991;179(1):165–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15(1):9–20. doi: 10.1007/s003840050002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1189–1193. doi: 10.1007/BF02257780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1995;27(7):469–479. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Nelson H, et al. A prospective, blinded assessment of the impact of preoperative staging on the management of rectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2002;123(1):24–32. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2007;39:418–422. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Croat Med J. 2003;44(5):635–638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jadad AR, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Puli SR, Singh S, Hagedorn CH, Reddy J, Olyaee M. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS for vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(6):788–797. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Antillon M, Ibdah JA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(25):4011–4019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Ibdah JA, Antillon M. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(10):1479–1490. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Leemis LM, Trivedi KS. A comparison of approximate interval estimators for the Bernoulli parameter. Am Stat. 1996;50:63–68. doi: 10.2307/2685046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen; 1970.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JAC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–3457. doi: 10.1002/sim.2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101. doi: 10.2307/2533446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sterne JAC, Egger M, Davey-Smith G. Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001;323:101–105. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sterne JAC, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:1046–1055. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sailer M, Leppert R, Kraemer M, et al. The value of endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of adenomas, T1- and T2-carcinomas. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(4):214–219. doi: 10.1007/s003840050092.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maor Y, Nadler M, Barshack I, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic value before and following chemoradiation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:454–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03927.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Akasu T, Kondo H, Moriya Y, et al. Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2000;24(9):1061–1068. doi: 10.1007/s002680010151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Norton SA, Thomas MG. Staging of rectosigmoid neoplasia with colonoscopic endoluminal ultrasonography. Brit J Surg. 1999;86(7):942–946(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kaneko K, Boku N, Hosokawa K, et al. Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative rectal cancer staging estimation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996;26(1):30–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, et al. Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(2):159–166. doi: 10.1007/BF02237121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nishimori H, Sasaki K, Hirata K, et al. The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Int Surg. 1998;83(2):157–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hsieh PS, Changchien CR, Chen JS, et al. Comparing results of preoperative staging of rectal tumor using endorectal ultrasonography and histopathology. Chang Gung Med J. 2003;26(7):474–478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, et al. Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(Suppl 10):S10–S15. doi: 10.1007/BF02062014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Waizer A, Powsner E, Russo I, et al. Prospective comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(12):1068–1072. doi: 10.1007/BF02050063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srinivas R. Puli
    • 1
  • Matthew L. Bechtold
    • 1
  • Jyotsna B. K. Reddy
    • 1
  • Abhishek Choudhary
    • 1
  • Mainor R. Antillon
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CE443 Clinical Support & EducationUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations