Can Endoscopic Ultrasound Predict Early Rectal Cancers That Can Be Resected Endoscopically? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
- 432 Downloads
Rectal cancers that are confined to the mucosa (T0) can be resected endoscopically. This can help the patient avoid transabdominal surgery. The published data on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to predict T0 stage of rectal cancers has been varied.
To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in T0 staging of rectal cancers.
Method (Study Selection Criteria)
Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. T0 was defined as tumor confined to the mucosa.
Data Collection and Extraction
Articles were searched in Medline, PubMed, and CENTRAL.
Pooling was conducted by both the fixed-effects model and random-effects model.
An initial search identified 3,360 reference articles. Of these, 339 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Eleven studies (N = 1,791) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing T0 was 97.3% (95% CI: 93.7–99.1). EUS had a pooled specificity of 96.3% (95% CI: 95.3–97.2). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 21.9 (95% CI: 16.3–29.7) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04–0.15). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed and random effect models, were similar. The P-value for Chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >0.10.
EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity, this helps accurately diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers. Over the past two decades, the sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers has remained high. This can help physicians offer endoscopic treatment to these patients, therefore EUS should be strongly considered for staging of early rectal cancers.
KeywordsEndoscopic ultrasound Rectal cancer Staging Meta-analysis Systematic review
- 2.National Cancer Institute. Surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER). US National Institutes of Health. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/results_merged/sect_06_colon_rectum.pdf .
- 8.Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.Google Scholar
- 9.Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donaldson G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer. 1983;52(7):1317–1329. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1317::AID-CNCR2820520731>3.0.CO;2-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Minsky BD, Mies C, Recht A, Rich TA, Chaffey JT. Resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid and rectum: patterns of failure and survival. Cancer. 1988;61(7):1408–1416. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880401)61:7<1408::AID-CNCR2820610722>3.0.CO;2-A.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Willett CG, Lewandrowski K, Donelly S, Shellito PC, Convery K, Eliseo R. Compton CC. Are there patients with stage I rectal carcinoma at risk for failure after abdominoperineal resection? Cancer. 1992;69(7):1651–1655. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7<1651::AID-CNCR2820690703>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML, Diaz-Arias AA, Ibdah JA, Marshall JB. En Bloc submucosal Dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Matsuda T, Saito Y, Uraoka T, et al. Therapeutic strategy for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the colorectum. Syokaki naisikyo. 2006;18:1151–1157.Google Scholar
- 19.Nakajima K, Shin-ichi M, Aoki T, et al. Result of endoscopic resection and treatment strategy including operation for colorectal adenoma and early cancer of 20 mm or more in diameter. Prog Dig Endosc. 2006;68:67–72.Google Scholar
- 24.Sleisenger and Fortran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Saunders, 2006.Google Scholar
- 31.Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1995;27(7):469–479. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005751.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Croat Med J. 2003;44(5):635–638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen; 1970.Google Scholar
- 43.Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984.Google Scholar
- 44.Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.Google Scholar