Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 709–715 | Cite as

Reproducibility and Performance Characteristics of Colonic Compliance, Tone, and Sensory Tests in Healthy Humans

  • Suwebatu T. Odunsi
  • Michael Camilleri
  • Adil E. Bharucha
  • Athanasios Papathanasopoulos
  • Irene Busciglio
  • Duane Burton
  • Alan R. Zinsmeister
Original Article


Background The performance characteristics of colonic sensation and motility measurements are unclear. Aim To compare left colon compliance, tone, and sensation in males and females and to evaluate inter and intra-individual coefficients of variation (COV) in these measurements. Methods Data were acquired using standard barostat methods, by one technologist, in 72 human volunteers (38 males, 18–65 years). We measured compliance, fasting tone, and sensation during baseline and post-placebo; postprandial (PP) tone was measured only post-placebo. Compliance and thresholds for first sensation, gas, and pain were measured using ascending method of limits; sensory ratings (0–100 mm VAS) using random phasic distensions at 8–36 mmHg above baseline operating pressure. Change in PP tone was measured by barostat balloon volume for the first 30 min after a 1000-kcal meal. Inter-COV was calculated as 100 (SD/mean), and intra-COV as (100 × SD delta/overall mean). Results There were no statistically significant associations with gender for most sensory or motor data at baseline. A modest association of fasting colonic tone and gender was observed. COV are lower (20–35%) for compliance, fasting tone, pain threshold, and sensation ratings than for PP tone and threshold for first or gas sensation (>45%). COV data are similar in males and females; sensation COVs appear smaller in females than in males. Conclusions Testing of compliance, tone and pain, and gas sensation in left colon performs adequately to assess these functions in humans. Lower COV for sensation tests among females is relevant to plan studies of drugs intended for functional GI disorders.


Sensory ratings Ascending method of limits Perception Visceral Postprandial 


  1. 1.
    Lembo T, Munakata J, Mertz H, et al. Evidence for the hypersensitivity of lumbar splanchnic afferents in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1686–1696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mertz H, Naliboff B, Munakata J, Niazi N, Mayer EA. Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:40–52. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90267-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mearin F, Cucala M, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. The origin of symptoms on the brain-gut axis in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 1991;101:999–1006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camilleri M. Management of the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:652–668. doi:10.1053/gast.2001.21908.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouin M, Plourde V, Boivin M, et al. Rectal distention testing in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of pain sensory thresholds. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1771–1777. doi:10.1053/gast.2002.33601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouin M, Lupien F, Riberdy M, et al. Intolerance to visceral distension in functional dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome: an organ specific defect or a pan intestinal dysregulation? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16:311–314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00511.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lembo T, Naliboff B, Munakata J, et al. Symptoms and visceral perception in patients with pain-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1320–1326. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01009.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Posserud I, Syrous A, Lindström L, et al. Altered rectal perception in irritable bowel syndrome is associated with symptom severity. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1113–1123. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorn SD, Palsson OS, Thiwan SI, et al. Increased colonic pain sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome is the result of an increased tendency to report pain rather than increased neurosensory sensitivity. Gut. 2007;56:1202–1209. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.117390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steens J, Van Der Schaar PJ, Penning C, Brussee J, Masclee AA. Compliance, tone and sensitivity of the rectum in different subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14:241–247. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00332.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitehead WE, Delvaux M, The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK. Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:223–241. doi:10.1023/A:1018885028501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cremonini F, Houghton LA, Camilleri M, et al. Barostat testing of rectal sensation and compliance in humans: comparison of results across two centres and overall reproducibility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005;17:810–820. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00709.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grotz RL, Pemberton JH, Levin KE, Bell AM, Hanson RB. Rectal wall contractility in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic severe constipation. Ann Surg. 1993;218:761–768. doi:10.1097/00000658-199312000-00010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bell AM, Pemberton JH, Hanson RB, Zinsmeister AR. Variations in muscle tone of the human rectum: recordings with an electromechanical barostat. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:G17–G25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Melton J III, Wiltgen C, Zinsmeister AR. A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:671–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hammer HF, Phillips SF, Camilleri M, Hanson RB. Rectal tone, distensibility, and perception: reproducibility and response to different distensions. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:G584–G590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Floyd BNI, Camilleri M, Andresen V, Esfandyari T, Busciglio I, Zinsmeister AR. Comparison of mathematical methods for calculating colonic compliance in humans: power exponential, computer-based, and manual linear interpolation models. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:330–335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01024.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ford MJ, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, Hanson RB. Psychosensory modulation of colonic sensation in the human transverse and sigmoid colon. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1772–1780. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90743-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bharucha AE, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, Hanson RB. Adrenergic modulation of human colonic motor and sensory function. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:G997–G1006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delgado-Aros S, Chial HJ, Camilleri M, et al. Effects of a kappa-opioid agonist, asimadoline, on satiation and GI motor and sensory functions in humans. Am J Physiol. 2003;284:G558–G566.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, di Lorenzo C, et al. American neurogastroenterology and motility society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:1269–1282. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01230.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pensabene L, Youssef NN, Griffiths JM, Di Lorenzo C. Colonic manometry in children with defecatory disorders. Role in diagnosis and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1052–1057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martin MJ, Steele SR, Mullenix PS, Noel JM, Weichmann D, Azarow KS. A pilot study using total colonic manometry in the surgical evaluation of pediatric functional colonic obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:352–359. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Di Lorenzo C, Solzi GF, Flores AF, Schwankovsky L, Hyman PE. Colonic motility after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1759–1764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Villarreal J, Sood M, Zangen T, et al. Colonic diversion for intractable constipation in children: colonic manometry helps guide clinical decisions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;33:588–591. doi:10.1097/00005176-200111000-00014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van den Berg MM, Hogan M, Caniano DA, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA, Mousa HM. Colonic manometry as predictor of cecostomy success in children with defecation disorders. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:730–736. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Camilleri M, McKinzie S, Busciglio I, et al. Prospective study of motor, sensory, psychologic, and autonomic functions in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:772–781. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    van der Veek PP, Van Rood YR, Masclee AA. Symptom severity but not psychopathology predicts visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:321–328. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brock C, Nissen TD, Gravesen FH, et al. Multimodal sensory testing of the rectum and rectosigmoid: development and reproducibility of a new method. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:908–918. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01126.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simrén M, Abrahamsson H, Björnsson ES. An exaggerated sensory component of the gastrocolonic response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2001;48:20–27. doi:10.1136/gut.48.1.20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grover M, Kanazawa M, Palsson OS, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: association with colon motility, bowel symptoms, and psychological distress. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008;20:998–1008. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01142.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tack J, Broekaert D, Corsetti M, Fischler B, Janssens J. Influence of acute serotonin reuptake inhibition on colonic sensorimotor function in man. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:265–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02724.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Holtmann G, Goebell H, Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: is there a common pathophysiological basis? Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:954–959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Camilleri M, Chang L. Challenges to the therapeutic pipeline for irritable bowel syndrome: end points and regulatory hurdles. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1877–1891. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suwebatu T. Odunsi
    • 1
  • Michael Camilleri
    • 1
  • Adil E. Bharucha
    • 1
  • Athanasios Papathanasopoulos
    • 1
  • Irene Busciglio
    • 1
  • Duane Burton
    • 1
  • Alan R. Zinsmeister
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (C.E.N.T.E.R.), College of MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of MedicineMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations