Screening Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic People: A Meta-Analysis

  • Yaron Niv
  • Rachel Hazazi
  • Zohar Levi
  • Gerald Fraser


Objective The preferred method for screening asymptomatic people for colorectal cancer (CRC) is colonoscopy, according to the new American guidelines. The aim of our study was to perform a meta-analysis of the prospective cohorts using total colonoscopy for screening this population for CRC. We looked for the diagnostic yield of the procedure as well as for its safety in a screening setting. Methods We included papers with more than 500 participants and only those reporting diagnostic yield of adenoma (and/or advanced adenoma) and CRC. Nested analysis were performed for secondary endpoints of complications and CRC stages when this information was available. All analyses were performed with StatDirect Statistical software, version 2.6.1 ( Results Our search yielded ten studies of screening colonoscopy conducted in asymptomatic people that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 68,324 participants. Colonoscopy was complete and reached the cecum in 97% of the procedures. Colorectal cancer was found in 0.78% of the participants (95% confidence interval 0.13–2.97%). Stage I or II were found in 77% of the patients with CRC. Advanced adenoma was found in 5% of the cases (95% confidence interval 4–6%). Complications were rare and described in five cohorts. Perforation developed in 0.01% of the cases (95% confidence interval 0.006–0.02%) and bleeding in 0.05% (95% confidence interval 0.02–0.09%). Conclusions Our findings support the notion that colonoscopy is feasible and a suitable method for screening for CRC in asymptomatic people.


Colonoscopy Screening Colorectal cancer Adenoma Fecal occult blood test 


  1. 1.
    Levin B, Lieberman D, McFarland B et al (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guidelines from the American cancer society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American college of radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH (2006) ASGE guideline colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endo 63:546–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogge JD, Elmore MF, Mahoney SJ, Brown ED, Troiano FP, Wagner DR, Black DJ, Pound DC (1994) Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastro 89:1775–1780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Ching Y et al (2000) Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 343:169–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al (2002) Results of screening colonoscopy among prsons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 346:1781–1785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibanez MB, Munoz-Navas MA, Dugue JM et al (2004) Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 59:634–641Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soon MS, Kozarek RA, Ayub K et al (2005) Screening colonoscopy in Chinese and Western patients: a comparative study. Am J Gastro 100:2749–2755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A et al (2005) Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 352:2061–2068PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiu HM, Wang HP, Lee YC et al (2005) A prospective study of the frequency and the topographical distribution of colon neoplasia in asymptomatic average-risk Chinese adults as determined by colonoscopic screening. Gastrintest Endosc 61:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355:1863–1872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M et al (2006) The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40–80 years. Am J Gastro 101:255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerge T et al (2002) effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening–a systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern med 137:96–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieberman D (1995) Cost-effectiveness models for colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology 109:1781–1790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pox C, Schmiegel W, Classen M (2007) Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States. Endoscopy 39:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta AK, Melton LJ III, Peterson GM et al (2005) Changing trends in the incidence, stage, survival, and screen-detection of colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Clin Gastro Hepatol 3:150–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tulchnsky H, Madhala-Givon O, Wasserberg N et al (2006) Indicence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years’ experience. World J gastro 12:4211–4213Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaron Niv
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rachel Hazazi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zohar Levi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gerald Fraser
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyRabin Medical Center, Beilinson HospitalPetach TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations