Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 336–346 | Cite as

Biomechanical Remodeling of the Chronically Obstructed Guinea Pig Small Intestine

  • Jan Henrik Storkholm
  • Jingbo Zhao
  • Gerda E. Villadsen
  • H. Hager
  • Steen L. Jensen
  • Hans Gregersen
Original Paper

Abstract

Small intestinal obstruction is a frequently encountered clinical problem. To understand the mechanisms behind obstruction and the clinical consequences, data are needed on the relation between the morphologic and biomechanical remodeling that takes place in the intestinal wall during chronic obstruction. We sought to determine the effect of partial obstruction on mechanical and morphologic properties of the guinea pig small intestine. Partial obstruction was created surgically in 2 groups of animals living for 2 and 4 weeks. Controls were sham operated and lived for 4 weeks. A combined impedance planimetry–high-frequency ultrasound system was designed to measure the luminal cross-sectional area and wall thickness. These measures were used to compute the circumferential stress and strain of the excised intestinal segments. The incremental elastic modulus was obtained by using nonlinear fitting of the stress–strain curve. Histologic analysis and the measurements of total wall collagen were also performed. The luminal cross-sectional area, wall thickness, and elastic modulus in circumferential direction increased in a time-dependent manner proximal to the obstruction site (P < 0.01), whereas no differences in these parameters were found distal to the obstruction site (P > 0.25). The circumferential stress–strain curves of the proximal segments in 2- and 4-week groups shifted to the left, indicating the intestinal wall became stiffer. Histologic examination revealed a massive increase in the thickness of the muscle layer especially the circular smooth muscle layer (P < 0.05). The collagen content proximal to the obstruction site was significantly larger in the partially obstructed animals compared to controls (P < 0.05). No difference was found distal to the obstruction site. Strong correlation was found between the collagen content and the elastic modulus at stress levels of 70 kPa stress (P < 0.01) and 10 kPa (P < 0.05) proximal to the obstruction site suggesting that the alteration of collagen has great impact on the mechanical remodeling. The morphologic and biomechanical remodeling likely influence the function of the intestine affected by partial obstructed intestine.

Keywords

Remodeling Hypertrophy Partial obstruction Stress–strain Stiffness 

References

  1. 1.
    Siegle ML, Ehrlein HJ (1989) Effects of various agents on ileal postprandial motor patterns and transit of chyme in dogs. Am J Physiol 257:G698–G703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gregersen H, Orvar K, Christensen J (1992) Biomechanical properties of duodenal wall and duodenal tone during phase I and phase II of the MMC. Am J Physiol 263:G795–G801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dou Y, Gregersen S, Zhao J, et al. (2002) Morphometric and biomechanical intestinal remodeling induced by fasting in rats. Dig Dis Sci 47:1158–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dou Y, Lu X, Zhao J, Gregersen H (2002) Morphometric and biomechanical remodelling in the intestine after small bowel resection in the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 14:43–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao J, Yang J, Gregersen H (2003) Biomechanical and morphometric intestinal remodelling during experimental diabetes in rats. Diabetologia 46:1688–1697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhao J, Liao D, Yang J, Gregersen H (2003) Viscoelastic behavior of small intestine in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Dig Dis Sci 48:2271–2277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao J, Yang J, Vinter-Jensen L, et al. (2002) The morphometry and biomechanical properties of the rat small intestine after systemic treatment with epidermal growth factor. Biorheology 39:719–733PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bertoni S, Gabella G (2001) Hypertrophy of mucosa and serosa in the obstructed intestine of rats. J Anat 199:725–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang IY, Glasgow NJ, Takayama I, et al. (2001) Loss of interstitial cells of Cajal and development of electrical dysfunction in murine small bowel obstruction. J Physiol 536:555–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canavese M, Geuna S, Poncino A, Giacobini Robecchi MG (1992) Hyperplasia of the intestinal smooth muscle tissue proximal to a partial surgical stenosis: an autoradiographic study [in Italian]. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 68:9–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gabella G (1990) Hypertrophy of visceral smooth muscle. Anat Embryol (Berl) 182:409–424Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics. Properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregersen H (2002) Biomechanics of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer-Verlag, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Storkholm JH, Villadsen GE, Jensen SL, Gregersen H (1998) Mechanical properties and collagen content differ between isolated guinea pig duodenum, jejunum, and distal ileum. Dig Dis Sci 43:2034–2041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu X, Zhao J, Gregersen H (2005) Small intestinal morphometric and biomechanical changes during physiological growth in rats. J Biomech 38:417–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gabella G (1975) Hypertrophy of intestinal smooth muscle. Cell Tissue Res 163:199–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulze-Delrieu K, Brown B, Herman B, et al. (1995) Preservation of peristaltic reflex in hypertrophied ileum of guinea pig. Am J Physiol 269:G49–G59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gregersen H, Kassab G (1996) Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil 8:277–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gregersen H, Stodkilde-Jorgensen H, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen SO (1998) The four-electrode impedance technique: a method for investigation of compliance in luminal organs. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 9(Suppl A):61–64Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gregersen H, Andersen MB (1991) Impedance measuring system for quantification of cross-sectional area in the gastrointestinal tract. Med Biol Eng Comput 29:108–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lose G, Colstrup H, Saksager K, Kristensen JK (1986) New probe for measurement of related values of cross-sectional area and pressure in a biological tube. Med Biol Eng Comput 24:488–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gregersen H, Kraglund K, Djurhuus JC (1990) Variations in duodenal cross-sectional area during the interdigestive migrating motility complex. Am J Physiol 259:G26–G31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Storkholm JH, Villadsen GE, Krogh K, et al. (1997) Dimensions and mechanical properties of porcine aortic segments determined by combined impedance planimetry and high-frequency ultrasound. Med Biol Eng Comput 35:21–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Storkholm JH, Frobert O, Gregersen H (1997) Static elastic wall properties of the abdominal porcine aorta in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 13:31–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Armitage P, Berry G (1994) Statistical methods in medical research. 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bertoni S, Gabella G, Ghizzardi P, et al. (2004) Motor responses of rat hypertrophic intestine following chronic obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:365–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Earlam RJ (1971) Ganglion cell changes in experimental stenosis of the gut. Gut 12:393–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gabella G, Yamey A (1977) Synthesis of collagen by smooth muscle in the hyertrophic intestine. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 62:257–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Okada A, Okamoto E (1971) Submucous plexus in hypertrophied intestine. J Neurovisc Relat 32:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Okada A Okamoto (1971). Myenteric plexus in hypertrophied intestine. J Neurovisc Relat 32:75–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gabella G (1984) Hypertrophic smooth muscle. V. Collagen and other extracellular materials. Vascularization. Cell Tissue Res 235:275–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bornstein P, Sage H (1980) Structurally distinct collagen types. Annu Rev Biochem 49:957–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fackler K, Klein L, Hiltner A (1981) Polarizing light microscopy of intestine and its relationship to mechanical behaviour. J Microsc 124:305–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gabella G (1987) The cross-ply arrangement of collagen fibres in the submucosa of the mammalian small intestine. Cell Tissue Res 248:491–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orberg J, Baer E, Hiltner A (1983) Organization of collagen fibers in the intestine. Connect Tissue Res 11:285–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Roach MR, Burton AC (1957) The reason for the shape of the distensibility curves of arteries. Can J Biochem Physiol 35:681–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sims TJ, Rasmussen LM, Oxlund H, Bailey AJ (1996) The role of glycation cross-links in diabetic vascular stiffening. Diabetologia 39:946–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Enochsson L, Nylander G, Ohman U (1982) Effects of intraluminal pressure on regional blood flow in obstructed and unobstructed small intestines in the rat. Am J Surg 144:558–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Morton LF, Barnes MJ (1982) Collagen polymorphism in the normal and diseased blood vessel wall. Investigation of collagens types I, III and V. Atherosclerosis 42:41–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gabella G (1979) Hypertrophic smooth muscle. I. Size and shape of cells, occurrence of mitoses. Cell Tissue Res 201:63–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Graham MF, Diegelmann RF, Elson CO, et al. (1988) Collagen content and types in the intestinal strictures of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 94:257–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mittal RK, Ren J, McCallum RW, et al. (1990) Modulation of feline esophageal contractions by bolus volume and outflow obstruction. Am J Physiol 258:G208–G215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cullen BM, Harkness RD (1968) Collagen formation and changes in cell population in the rat's uterus after distension with wax. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci 53:33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hernanz-Schulman M (2003) Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Radiology 227:319–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Miyamoto M, Egami K, Maeda S, Ohkawa K, Tanaka N, Uchida E, Tajiri T (2005) Hirschsprung's disease in adults: report of a case and review of the literature. J Nippon Med Sch 72:113–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Park W, Vaezi MF (2005) Etiology and pathogenesis of achalasia: the current understanding. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1404–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hsieh TK, Chen AC, Wu SF, Chen W (2005) Postoperative intussusception in children with enterostomy. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 46:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zollinger RM Jr (1986) Primary neoplasms of the small intestine. Am J Surg 151:654–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Froehlich F, Juillerat P, Mottet C, Felley C, Vader JP, Burnand B, Gonvers JJ, Michetti P (2005) Obstructive fibrostenotic Crohn's disease. Digestion 71:29–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Henrik Storkholm
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jingbo Zhao
    • 3
  • Gerda E. Villadsen
    • 1
  • H. Hager
    • 1
  • Steen L. Jensen
    • 2
  • Hans Gregersen
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Clinical InstituteAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySection AKH, Aarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Center of Excellence in Visceral Biomechanics and PainAalborg HospitalAalborgDenmark
  4. 4.National Center of Ultrasound in GastroenterologyBergen University and Haukeland HospitalBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations