Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 51, Issue 9, pp 1509–1515 | Cite as

Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Symptoms Questionnaire

  • H. J. BovenschenEmail author
  • M. J. R. Janssen
  • M. G. H. van Oijen
  • R. J. F. Laheij
  • L. G. M. van Rossum
  • J. B. M. J. Jansen
Original Article


Questionnaires are widely used instruments to monitor gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. However, few of these questionnaires have been formally evaluated. We sought to evaluate our GI symptoms questionnaire in terms of clarity and reproducibility. Primary care patients referred for open access Helicobacter pylori urea breath testing reported GI symptoms (type+severity) and demographic information by written questionnaire. In an interview, patients gave a personal description of the meaning of the GI symptoms on the questionnaire. Patients’ descriptions of GI symptoms were compared with current definitions. Symptom severity scores were compared before and after, interview versus questionnaire. Of the 45 patients included, 19 (42%) described all symptoms correctly, whereas 17 (38%) described one symptom incorrectly. None of the patients made more than three mistakes. Regurgitation was the most common incorrectly described symptom (16 patients [36%]), whereas the other individual symptoms were well explained. Symptom severities before the interview, after the interview and reported by questionnaire (mean value±SEM) were 2.1 ± 0.2, 2.1 ± 0.2, and 1.5 ± 0.2 points on a 7-point Likert scale (0–6), respectively. Mean severity reported by interview (95% CI) was 1.4 (1.3–1.5) times higher than reported by questionnaire (P < .05). In conclusion, the GI symptom questionnaire is understandable and has good reproducibility for measuring the presence of GI symptoms, although symptom severity is consistently rated higher when reported by interview.


Dyspepsia Evaluation Gastrointestinal symptoms Questionnaire 


  1. 1.
    Knill-Jones RP: Geographical differences in the prevalence of dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol 26 (Suppl 182):17–24 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garatt AM, Ruta DA, Russell I, MacLeod K, Brunt P, McKinlay A, Mowat A, Sinclair T: Developing a condition-specific measure of health for patients with dyspepsia and ulcer-related symptoms. J Clin Epidemiol 49:565–571 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malfertheiner P: Current concepts in dyspepsia: a world perspective. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 (Suppl 1):S25–29 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guillemot F, Ducrotte P, Bueno L: Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in a population of subjects consulting for gastroesophageal reflux disease in general practice. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:243–246 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiklund I, Glise H, Jerndal P, Carlsson J, Talley NJ: Does endoscopy have a positive impact on quality of life in dyspepsia? Gastrointest Endosc 47:449–454 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimenäs E, Glise H, Hallerbäck B, Hernqvist H, Svedlund J, Wiklund I: Well-being and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients referred to endoscopy owing to suspected duodenal ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 30:1046–1052 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomson AB, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Chiba N, White RJ, Daniels A, Escobedo S, Chakraborty B, Sinclair P, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJO: The prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia: the Canadian adult dyspepsia empiric treatment—prompt endoscopy (CADET-PE) study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:1481–1491 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ofman JJ, Shaw M, Sadik K, Grogg A, Emery K, Lee J, Reyes E, Fullerton S: Identifying patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: validation of a practical screening tool. Dig Dis Sci 47:1863–1869 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Armstrong D, Berghöfer P, Gatz G, Mönnikes H: International validation of ReQuestTM in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:891–898 2004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Armstrong D, Berghöfer P, Gatz G, Mönnikes H: Evaluation of GERD symptoms during therapy. Part I. Development of the new GERD questionnaire ReQuestTM. Digestion 69:229–237 2004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuykendall DH, Rabeneck L, Campbell JM, Wray NP: Dyspepsia: how should we measure it? J Clin Epidemiol 51:99–106 1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kennedy T, Jones R: Development of a postal health status questionnaire to identify people with dyspepsia in the general population. Scand J Prim Health Care 13:243–249 1995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agréus L, Svärdsudd K, Nyrén O, Tibblin G: Reproducibility and validity of a postal questionnaire. The abdominal symptom study. Scand J Prim Health Care 11:252–262 1993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Österberg A, Graf W, Karlbom U, Pahlman L: Evaluation of a questionnaire in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence and constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 31:575–580 1996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Melton L3rd , Wiltgen C, Zinsmeister AR: A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease. Ann Intern Med 111:671–674 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruth M, Finizia C, Lundell L: Occurrence and future history of oesophageal symptoms in an urban Swedish population: Results of a questionnaire-based, ten-year follow-up study. Scand J Gastroentrerol 40:629–635 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DiBaise JK: A randomized, double-blind comparison of two different coffee-roasting processes on development of heartburn and dyspepsia in coffee-sensitive individuals. Dig Dis Sci 48:652–656 2003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Bovenschen
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. J. R. Janssen
    • 1
  • M. G. H. van Oijen
    • 1
  • R. J. F. Laheij
    • 1
  • L. G. M. van Rossum
    • 1
  • J. B. M. J. Jansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations