Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 221–229 | Cite as

Evaluation of Mucosal Eosinophils in the Pediatric Colon

  • Licia Pensabene
  • Marie-Anne Brundler
  • Juliane M Bank
  • Carlo Di Lorenzo

To evaluate the clinical significance of colonic eosinophilia, we conducted a retrospective study of all children older than 1 year evaluated at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh from January 1999 to June 2001 with a description of colonic eosinophilia in the pathology report. Medical records were reviewed. Diagnoses were confirmed by contacting the patients. Histological slides (H&E) were reviewed by an investigator blind to the patients’ data. Biopsies were grouped according to the site they were taken from and then screened at low power for areas of maximal eosinophilia for further quantitative analysis. Results of manual counts were validated by image analysis using Metaphor Image Analysis Software. Sixty-nine children with colonic eosinophilia were identified (36 male; mean age, 135.2 ± 55.4 months). Their final diagnoses were inflammatory bowel disease in 32% (group A), irritable bowel syndrome in 33% (group B), food allergies in 10% (group C), and other diagnoses in 25% (group D). The maximal eosinophil count per crypt area was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in group A vs groups B, C, and D (34.8 ± 17.1 vs 21.3 ± 8.8, 25.4 ± 16.7, and 24.2 ± 9.7, respectively). The total cellularity of the lamina propria was considered high only in group A (P < 0.05 vs groups B and C). A mostly equal vertical distribution of eosinophils throughout the lamina propria was found significantly more frequently in group A vs groups C (P = 0.04) and D (P = 0.007). We conclude that children with inflammatory bowel disease have an equal distribution of eosinophils throughout the lamina propria, with intraepithelial and intracryptal eosinophils and with a higher overall total cellularity. In irritable bowel syndrome and patients with a variety of other diagnoses, including allergies, the distribution is mostly superficial, with a lower total cellularity.


eosinophils colon functional bowel disorders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blackshaw AJ, Levison DA: Eosinophilic infiltrates of the gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Pathol 39:1–7, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Goldman H, Proujansky R: Allergic proctitis and gastroenteritis in children. Clinical and mucosal biopsy features in 53 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 10:75–86, 1986Google Scholar
  3. Heatley RV, James PD: Eosinophils in the rectal mucosa. A simple method of predicting the outcome of ulcerative proctocolitis? Gut 20:787–791, 1979Google Scholar
  4. Jenkins HR, Pincott JR, Soothill JF, Milla PJ, Harries JT: Food allergy: The major cause of infantile colitis. Arch Dis Child 59:326–329, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnstone JM, Morson BC: Eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Histo- pathology 2:335–348, 1978Google Scholar
  6. Lee M, Hodges WG, Huggins TL, Lee EL: Eosinophilic gastroenteritis. South Med J 89:189–194, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lowichik A, Weinberg AG: A quantitative evaluation of mucosal eosinophils in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. Mod Pathol 9:110–114, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosekrans PC, Meijer CJ, van der Wal AM, Lindeman J: Allergic proctitis, a clinical and immunopathological entity. Gut 21:1017–1023, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ureles A: Idiopathic eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract, diffuse and circumscribed. Am J Med 30:899–909, 1961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Winter HS, Antonioli DA, Fukagawa N, Marcial M, Goldman H: Allergy-related proctocolitis in infants: diagnostic usefulness of rectal biopsy. Mod Pathol 3:5–10, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldman H: Gastrointestinal Biopsy. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1996, p 241Google Scholar
  12. O’Sullivan M: Increased mast cells in the irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Mot 12:449–457, 2000Google Scholar
  13. Pascal RR, Gramlich TL, Parker KM, Gansler TS: Geographic variations in eosinophil concentration in normal colonic mucosa. Mod Pathol 10:363–365, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang GY, West AB: What do eosinophils tell us in biopsies of patients with inflammatory bowel disease? J Clin Gastroenterol 36:93–98, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Weller PF: The immunobiology of eosinophils. N Engl J Med 324:1110–1118, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleich GJ, Adolphson CR, Leiferman KM: The biology of the eosinophilic leukocyte. Annu Rev Med 44:85–101, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothenberg ME, Mishra A, Brandt EB, Hogan SP: Gastrointestinal eosinophils. Immunol Rev 179:139–155, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kato M, Kephart GM, Morikawa A, Gleich GJ: Eosinophil infiltration and degranulation in normal human tissues: Evidence for eosinophil degranulation in normal gastrointestinal tract. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 125 (Suppl 1):55–58, 2001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothenberg ME, Mishra A, Brandt EB, Hogan SP: Gastrointestinal eosinophils in health and disease. Adv Immunol 78:291–328, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Desreumaux P, Nutten S, Colombel JF: Activated eosinophils in inflammatory bowel disease: Do they matter? Am J Gastroenterol 94:3396–3398, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwab D, Muller S, Aigner T, Neureiter D, Kirchner T, Hahn EG, Raithel M: Functional and morphologic characterization of eosinophils in the lower intestinal mucosa of patients with food allergy. Am J Gastroenterol 98:1525–1534, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Furuta GTAS, Wershil BK: The role of the eosinophil in gastrointestinal diseases. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 11:541–547, 1995Google Scholar
  23. Levy AM, Kita K: The eosinophil in gut inflammation: effector or director? Gastroenterology 110:952–954, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothenberg M: Eosinophilia. N Engl J Med 338:1592–1600, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bischoff SC, Wedemeyer J, Herrmann A, Meier PN, Trautwein C, Cetin Y, Maschek H, Stolte M, Gebel M, Manns MP: Quantitative assessment of intestinal eosinophils and mast cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Histopathology 28:1–13, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarin SK, Malhotra V, Sen Gupta S, Karol A, Gaur SK, Anand BS: Significance of eosinophil and mast cell counts in rectal mucosa in ulcerative colitis. A prospective controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 32:363–367, 1987Google Scholar
  27. Choy MY, Walker-Smith JA, Williams CB, MacDonald TT: Activated eosinophils in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet 336:126–127, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Raab Y, Fredens K, Gerdin B, Hallgren R: Eosinophil activation in ulcerative colitis: Studies on mucosal release and localization of eosinophil granule constituents. Dig Dis Sci 43:1061–1070, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubio CA: A method for the detection of eosinophilic granulocytes in colonoscopic biopsies from IBD patients. Pathol Res Pract 199:145–150, 2003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Talley NJ, Butterfield JH: Mast cell infiltration and degranulation in colonic mucosa in the irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1675–1676, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bischoff S: Mucosal allergy: Role of mast cells and eosinophil granulocytes in the gut. Bailliere’s Clin Gastroenterol 10:443–459, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Licia Pensabene
    • 1
  • Marie-Anne Brundler
    • 2
  • Juliane M Bank
    • 3
  • Carlo Di Lorenzo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology, Children’s Hospital of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations