Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 49, Issue 11–12, pp 1803–1807 | Cite as

Long-Term Effects of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilation on Gallbladder Motility

  • Masanori SugiyamaEmail author
  • Yutaka Atomi
Article

Abstract

We prospectively studied long-term (5 years) effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) on gallbladder motility. Thirteen patients with intact gallbladders (six with and seven without gallbladder stones) who had undergone EPBD for choledocholithiasis were enrolled in this study. Gallbladder volumes, while fasting and after dried egg yolk ingestion, were determined by ultrasonography, before and at 7 days, 1 month, and 1, 2, and 5 years after EPBD. Before EPBD, the gallbladder had a larger fasting volume and lower yolk-stimulated maximum contraction than in normal controls. Seven days after EPBD, fasting volume was decreased and maximum contraction was increased, regardless of whether the patient had gallbladder stones, showing significant differences from the pre-EPBD values. At 1 month to 5 years after EPBD, these changes were far less evident and gallbladder function did not differ significantly from baseline. EPBD does not adversely affect gallbladder motility in the long-term (5 years).

endoscopic papillary balloon dilation gallbladder motility acute cholecystitis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    May G, Cotton PB, Edmunds SE, Chong W: Removal of stones from the bile duct at ERCP without sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 39:749–754, 1993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mac Mathuna P, White P, Clarke E, Lennon J, Crowe J: Endoscopic sphincteroplasty: a novel and safe alternative to papillotomy in the management of bile duct stones. Gut 35:127–129, 1994CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minami A, Nakatsu T, Uchida N, Hirabayashi S, Fukuma H, Morshed SA, Nishioka M: Papillary dilation vs sphincterotomy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function. Dig Dis Sc 40:2550–2554, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, van Berkel AM, Bossuyt PM, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K: Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones. Lancet 349:1124–1129, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N, Ohashi M, Isayama M, Tateishi K, Sato S, Koike Y, Yamagata M, Tada M, Shiratori Y, Yamada H, Ihori M, Kawase T, Omata M: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy 30:12–17, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, Yasuda I, Hasebe O, Igarashi Y, Murakami A, Mukai H, Fujii T, Yamao K, Maeshiro K: JESED Study Group. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 57:151–155, 2003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sato H, Kodama T, Takaaki J, Tatsumi Y, Maeda T, Fujita S, Fukui Y, Ogasawara H, Mitsufuji S: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation may preserve sphincter of Oddi function after common bile duct stone management: evaluation from the viewpoint of endoscopic manometry. Gut 41:541–544, 1997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yasuda I, Tomita E, Enya M, Kato T, Moriwaki H: Can endoscopic papillary balloon dilation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function? Gut 49:686–691, 2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y: Does endoscopic papillary balloon dilation affect gallbladder motility? Gastrointest Endosc 50:74–78, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y: Medium-term effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation on gallbladder motility. Gastrointest Endosc 54:459–463, 2001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Everson GT, Braverman DZ, Johnson ML, Kern F Jr: A critical evaluation of real-time ultrasonography for the study of gallbladder volume and contraction. Gastroenterology 79:40–46, 1980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cotton PB, Vallon AG: Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones in patients with gallbladders. Surgery 91:628–630, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tanaka M, Ikeda S, Yoshimoto H, Matsumoto S: The long-term fate of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy: Complete follow-up study of 122 patients. Am J Surg 154:505–509, 1987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL: Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 29:114–120, 1988CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegel JH, Safrany L, Ben-Zvi JS, Pullano WE, Cooperman A, Stenzel M, Ramsey WH: Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladders in situ: Report of a series of 1272 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 83:1255–1258, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosseland AR, Solhaug JH: Primary endoscopic papillotomy (EPT) in patients with stones in the common bile duct and the gallbladder in situ: A 5–8-year follow-up study. World J Surg 12:111–116, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill J, Martin DF, Tweedle DEF: Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Br J Surg 78:554–557, 1991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y: Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg 85:917–921, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohn MS, Schwartz SI, Faloon WW, Adams JT: Effect of sphincteroplasty on gallbladder function and bile compostion. Ann Surg 189:317–321, 1979CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sauerbruch T, Stellaard F, Paumgartner G: Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on bile acid pool size and bile lipid composition in man. Digestion 27:87–92, 1983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gregg JA, Girolami PD, Carr-Locke DL: Effects of sphincteroplasty and endoscopic sphincterotomy on the bacteriologic characteristics of the common bile duct. Am J Surg 149:668–671, 1985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hutton SW, Sievert CE Jr, Vennes JA, Duane WC: The effect of sphincterotomy on gallstone formation in the prairie dog. Gastroenterology 81:663–667, 1981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutton SW, Sievert CE Jr, Vennes JA, Duane WC: Inhibition of gallstone formation by sphincterotomy in the prairie dog: reversal by atropine. Gastroenterology 82:1308–1313, 1982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hutton SW, Sievert CE Jr, Vennes JA, Shafer RB, Duane WC: Spontaneous passage of glass beads from the canine gallbladder: Facilitation by sphincterotomy. Gastroenterology 94:1031–1035, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Agarwal DK, Sharma BC, Dhiman RK, Baijal SS, choudhuri G, Saraswat VA: Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gallbladder motility. Dig Dis Sci 42:1495–1500, 1997CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sugiyama M, Atomi Y: Longterm effects of endoscopic sphincterotomy on gall bladder motility. Gut 39:856–859, 1996CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Geenen JE, Toouli J, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Mavrelis P, Riedel D, Venu R: Endoscopic sphincterotomy: Follow-up evaluation of effects on the sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology 87:754–758, 1984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryKyorin University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations