The necessity of identity assessment of animal intestinal cell lines: A case report
- 287 Downloads
Eight intestinal cell lines, established from different animal species were submitted to DSMZ (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures) in order to analyze their species of origin and their microbial contamination. Species identity was determined by PCR targeting mitochondrial genes and hence confirmed by sequencing the amplified PCR products. For three cell lines (CIEB, CLAB, PSI-1) we confirmed the species identity, whereas the species of origin of the three other cell lines (B6, B10XI and IPEC) was not the expected one: B6 and B10XI cells, which were supposed to be of chicken origin were identified as porcine cells. IPEC, allegedly a sub clone of the well-known porcine intestinal cell line IPEC-J2, was of bovine instead of porcine origin. However, two further IPEC-clones, namely IPEC-1 and IPEC-J2, provided by another source were shown to be derived from the correct species (i.e. pig). Furthermore, six out of these eight cell lines turned out to be highly contaminated with mycoplasma. Alerted by this high incidence of infected and false specified cell lines, we feel obliged to inform all those working with animal intestinal cell lines and we strongly recommend verifying the species identity before using them. Also, the presence of mycoplasma should be tested when taking the cells in culture for the first time, and this mycoplasma control should be repeated at regular time intervals (e.g. every 4 weeks).
KeywordsCell Lines Identity control of cell lines Quality control of cell lines Species-PCR Speciation Mycoplasma Infection Intestinal cell lines IPEC-cells
We gratefully thank Prof. Dr. Hermann-Josef Rothkötter, University of Magdeburg for donation of the IPEC-1 and IPEC-J2 cells to DSMZ.
- Allston-Roberts C, Barallon R, Bauer SR, Butler J, Capes-Davis A, Dirks WG, Elmore E, Furtado M, Kerrigan L, Kline MC, Kohara A, Los GV, MacLeod RAF, Masters JR, Nardone M, Nims RW, Price PJ, Reid YA, Shewale J, Steuer AF, Storts DR, Sykes G, Taraporewala Z, Thomson J (2010) Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end. Nat Rev Cancer 10:441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berschneider HM (1989) Development of normal cultured small intestinal epithelial cell lines which transport Na and Cl. Gastroenterol 96:A41Google Scholar
- Chantret I, Barbat A, Dussaulx E, Brattain MG, Zweibaum A (1988) Epithelial polarity, villin expression, and enterocytic differentiation of cultured human colon carcinoma cells: a survey of twenty cell lines. Cancer Res 48:1936–1942Google Scholar
- Gonzalez-Vallina R, Wang H, Zhan R, Berschneider HM, Lee RM, Davidson NO, Black DD (1996) Lipoprotein and apolipoprotein secretion by a newborn piglet intestinal cell line (IPEC-1). Am J Physiol 271:G249–G259Google Scholar
- Nossol C, Diesing AK, Walk N, Faber-Zuschratter H, Hertig R, Post A, Kluess J, Rothkötter HJ, Kahlert S (2011) Air-liquid interface cultures enhance the oxygen supply and trigger the structural and functional differentiation of intestinal porcine epithelial cells (IPEC). Histochem Cell Biol 36:103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schierack P, Nordhoff M, Pollmann M, Weyrauch KD, Amasheh S, Lodemann U, Jores J, Tachu B, Kleta S, Blikslager A, Tedin K, Wieler LH (2006) Characterization of a porcine intestinal epithelial cell line for in vitro studies of microbial pathogenesis in swine. Histochem Cell Biol 125:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stevenson R (1987) Development of cell banking in the US 1960–1985: a strategic approach to quality control. Adv Cell Cult 51:267–288Google Scholar
- Zoon KC (1993) Points to consider in the characterization of cell lines used to produce biologicals. Center for Biological Evaluation and Research. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, pp 7–8Google Scholar