Derivation, characterization and expansion of fetal chondrocytes on different microcarriers
- 198 Downloads
Fetal chondrocytes (FCs) have recently been identified as an alternative cell source for cartilage tissue engineering applications because of their partially chondrogenically differentiated phenotype and developmental plasticity. In this study, chondrocytes derived from fetal bovine cartilage were characterized and then cultured on commercially available Cytodex-1 and Biosilon microcarriers and thermosensitive poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate)-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PHEMA-PNIPAAm) beads produced by us. Growth kinetics of FCs were estimated by means of specific growth rate and metabolic activity assay. Cell detachment from thermosensitive microcarriers was induced by cold treatment at 4 °C for 20 min or enzymatic treatment was applied for the detachment of cells from Cytodex-1 and Biosilon. Although attachment efficiency and proliferation of FCs on PHEMA-PNIPAAm beads were lower than that of commercial Cytodex-1 and Biosilon microcarriers, these beads also supported growth of FCs. Detached cells from thermosensitive beads by cold induction exhibited a normal proliferative activity. Our results indicated that Cytodex-1 microcarrier was the most suitable material for the production of FCs in high capacity, however, ‘thermosensitive microcarrier model’ could be considered as an attractive solution to the process scale up for cartilage tissue engineering by improving surface characteristics of PHEMA-PNIPAAm beads.
KeywordsFetal chondrocyte Thermosensitive polymers Microcarriers PNIPAAm Cartilage tissue engineering
The authors are grateful to Sakir Sekmen for his assistance in obtaining tissue samples; to Melis Denizci Öncü for the critical reading. This study was partly supported by TURKHAYGEN-1 Project (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey,TUBITAK, KAMAG-106G005) and also TUBITAK Project No.109M228.
- Canavan HE, Cheng X, Graham DJ, Ratner BD, Castner DG (2005) Cell sheet detachment affects the extracellular matrix: a surface science study comparing thermal liftoff, enzymatic, and mechanical methods. J Biomed Mater Res A 75:1–13Google Scholar
- Freshney IR (2005) culture of animal cells a manual of basic technique, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, p 208Google Scholar
- Giard D (1986) Detachment of anchorage dependent cells from microcarriers, World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau WO 86/01531Google Scholar
- Gümüşderelioğlu M (2011) Development of temperature-sensistive microcarriers for large scale cell cultures, Turkish Scientific and Research Council Project (109M228) ReportGoogle Scholar
- GE Healthcare (2005) Microcarrier cell culture: principles and methods. General Electric CompanyGoogle Scholar
- Pioletti DP, Montjovent MO, Zambelli PY, Applegate L (2006) Bone tissue engineering using foetal cell therapy. Swiss Med Wkly 136:557–560Google Scholar
- Weber C, Pohl S, Portner R, Wallrapp C, Kassem M, Geigle P, Czermak P (2007) Expansion and harvesting of hMSC-TERT. Open Biomed Eng J 1:38–46Google Scholar