, Volume 55, Issue 2–3, pp 115–124 | Cite as

On-line monitoring of infected Sf-9 insect cell cultures by scanning permittivity measurements and comparison with off-line biovolume measurements

  • Sven AnsorgeEmail author
  • Geoffrey Esteban
  • Georg Schmid
Special Issue JAACT


Two infected Sf-9 cell cultures were monitored on-line by multi-frequency permittivity measurements using the Fogale BIOMASS SYSTEM® and by applying different off-line methods (CASY®1, Vi-CELL™, packed cell volume) to measure the biovolume and the mean diameter of the cell population. During the growth phase and the early infection phase the measured permittivity at the working frequency correlated well with the different off-line methods for the biovolume. We found a value of 0.67 pF cm−1 permittivity per unit of total biovolume (CASY) (μL mL−1). After the maximum value in the permittivity was reached, i.e. when the viability of the cultures decreased significantly, we observed different time courses for the biovolume depending on the applied method. The differences were compared and could be explained by the underlying measurement principles. Furthermore, the characteristic frequency (fC) was calculated from the on-line scanning permittivity measurements. The fC may provide an indication of changes in cell diameter and membrane properties especially after infection and could also be an indicator for the onset of the virus production phase. The changes in fC were qualitatively explained by the underlying equation that is correlating fC and the properties of the cell population (cell diameter, intracellular conductivity and capacitance per membrane area).


Baculovirus Biomass Biovolume Capacitance Characteristic frequency Insect cell culture On-line monitoring Permittivity Scanning spectroscopy Sf-9 



Cole–Cole alpha


Capacitance per membrane area (F m−2)


Cell permittivity (pF cm−1)


Permittivity difference at f1 and f2 (pF cm−1)


Characteristic frequency (Hz)




Volumetric oxygen mass transfer coefficient (h−1)


Phosphate buffered saline


Packed cell volume (μL mL−1)


Time of infection with baculovirus (h)



The authors would like to acknowledge C. Ghommidh from Université Montpellier II and M. Biselli from the Aachen University of Applied Sciences (Department Juelich) for the stimulating and fruitful discussions and remarks, M. Foggetta, M. Siegrist, J.-M. Vonach and J.-C. von Bueren for the support with small scale experiments and the setup of the bioreactor system and H. Remy for the use and help with the CASY®1 system. S. Ansorge was supported from March to September 2004 by a Hoffmann-La Roche AG fellowship and the presented results form a part of his diploma thesis at the Aachen University of Applied Sciences.


  1. Ansorge S, Esteban G, Ghommidh C, Schmid G (2007) Monitoring nutrient limitations by online capactitance measurements in batch and fed-batch CHO fermentations. In: Smith R (ed) Conference Proceedings to the 19th ESACT Meeting: Cell Technology for Cell Products. Springer, Dordrecht/NL, pp 723–726Google Scholar
  2. Cannizzaro C, Gugerli R, Marison I, von Stockar U (2003) On-line biomass monitoring of CHO perfusion culture with scanning dielectric spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:597–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chico E, Jäger V (1998) Measurements of changes in cell size distribution to monitor Baculovirus infection of insect cells. In: Merten OW, Perrin P, Griffiths B (eds) New developments and new applications in animal cell technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 329–331Google Scholar
  4. Cook JA, Mitchell JB (1989) Viability measurements in mammalian cell systems. Anal Biochem 179:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davey CL (1993) The biomass monitor source book. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, AberystwythGoogle Scholar
  6. Davey CL, Marckx GH, Kell DB (1993) On the dielectric method of monitoring cellular viability. Pure Appl Chem 65:1921–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ducommun P, Bolzonella I, Rhiel M, Pugeaud P, von Stockar U, Marison IW (2001) On-line determination of animal cell concentration. Biotechnol Bioeng 72:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ducommun P, Kadouri A, von Stockar U, Marison IW (2002) On-line determination of animal cell concentration in two industrial high-density culture processes by dielectric spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fehrenbach R, Comberbach M, Pêtre JO (1992) On-line biomass monitoring by capacitance measurement. J Biotechnol 23:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fogale Nanotech (2004) Biomass System User Manual V 3.0Google Scholar
  11. Foster KR, Schwan HP (1989) Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: A critical review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17:25–104Google Scholar
  12. Guan Y, Evans PM, Kemp RB (1998) Specific heat flow rate: an on-line monitor and potential control variable of specific metabolic rate in animal cell culture that combines microcalorimetry with dielectric spectroscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 58:464–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris CM, Todd RW, Bungard SJ, Lovitt RW, Morris JG, Kell DB (1987) Dielectric permittivity of microbial suspensions at radio frequencies: a novel method for the real-time estimation of microbial biomass. Enzyme Microb Technol 9:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamen AA, Bédard C, Tom R, Perret S, Jardin B (1996) On-line monitoring of respiration in recombinant-baculovirus infected and uninfected insect cell bioreactor cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kost TA, Condreay JP, Jarvis DL (2005) Baculovirus as versatile vectors for protein expression in insect and mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 23:567–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Markx GH, Davey CL (1999) The dielectric properties of biological cells at radiofrequencies: applications in biotechnology. Enzyme Microb Technol 25:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Noll T, Biselli M (1998) Dielectric spectroscopy in the cultivation of suspended and immobilized hybridoma cells. J Biotechnol 63:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsson L, Nielsen J (1997) On-line and in situ monitoring of biomass in submerged cultivations. Trends Biotechnol 15:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ooi BG, Miller LK (1988) Regulation of host RNA levels during baculovirus infection. Virology 166:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pethig R, Kell DB (1987) The passive electrical properties of biological systems: their significance in physiology, biophysics and biotechnology. Phys Med Biol 32:933–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schlaeger E-J (1996) Medium design for insect cell culture. Cytotechnology 20:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmid G (1996) Insect cell cultivation: growth and kinetics. Cytotechnology 20:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmid G, Wild N, Fountoulakis M, Gallati H, Gentz R, Ozmen L, Garotta G (1994) Production and characterization of soluble mouse and human interferon-g receptors (IFNg-R) from insect cells. In: Spier RE, Griffiths JB, Berthold W (eds) Conference Proceedings to the 12th ESACT Meeting: Animal cell technology: products for today, prospects for tomorrow. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford/UK, pp 625–632Google Scholar
  24. Schopf B, Howaldt MW, Bailey JE (1990) DNA distribution and respiratory activity of Spodoptera frugiperda populations infected with wild-type and recombinant Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J Biotechnol 15:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sonnleitner B, Locher G, Fiechter A (1992) Biomass determination. J Biotechnol 25:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stettler M, Jaccard N, Hacker D, De Jesus M, Wurm FM, Jordan M (2006) New disposable tubes for rapid and precise biomass assessment for suspension cultures of mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 95:1228–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taticek RA, Shuler ML (1997) Effect of elevated oxygen and glutamine levels on foreign protein production at high cell densities using the insect cell-baculovirus expression system. Biotechnol Bioeng 54:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winkelmeier P, Glauner B, Lindl T (1993) Quantification of cytotoxicity by cell volume and cell proliferation. Alterna Lab Anim 21:269–280Google Scholar
  29. Wong TK, Nielsen LK, Greenfield PF, Reid S (1994) Relationship between oxygen uptake rate and time of infection of Sf9 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus. Cytotechnology 15:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zeiser A, Bédard C, Voyer R, Jardin B, Tom R, Kamen AA (1999) On-line monitoring of the progress of infection in Sf-9 insect cell cultures using relative permittivity measurements. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeiser A, Elias CB, Voyer R, Jardin B, Kamen AA (2000) On-line monitoring of physiological parameters of insect cell cultures during the growth and infection process. Biotechnol Prog 16:803–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pharmaceuticals DivisionF. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Pharma Research Basel, Protein SciencesBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Animal Cell Technology GroupBiotechnology Research Institute, National Research Council CanadaMontrealCanada
  3. 3.FOGALE NanotechNimesFrance

Personalised recommendations