Cytotechnology

, 50:9 | Cite as

Reactor Engineering in Large Scale Animal Cell Culture

Original Paper

Abstract

This article mainly addresses the issues associated with the engineering of large-scale free suspension culture in agitated bioreactors >10,000 L because they have become the system of choice industrially. It is particularly concerned with problems that become increasingly important as the scale increases. However, very few papers have been written that are actually based on such large-scale studies and the few that do rarely address any of the issues quantitatively. Hence, it is necessary very often to extrapolate from small-scale work and this review tries to pull the two types of study together. It is shown that ‘shear sensitivity’ due to agitation and bursting bubbles is no longer considered a major problem. Homogeneity becomes increasingly important with respect to pH and nutrients at the largest scale and sub-surface feeding is recommended despite ‘cleaning in place’ concerns. There are still major questions with cell retention/recycle systems at these scales, either because of fouling, of capacity or of potential and different ‘shear sensitivity’ questions. Fed-batch operation gives rise to cell densities that have led to the use of oxygen and enriched air to meet oxygen demands. This strategy, in turn, gives rise to a CO2 evolution rate that impacts on pH control, pCO2 and osmolality. These interactions are difficult to resolve but if higher sparge and agitation intensities could be used to achieve the necessary oxygen transfer, the problem would largely disappear. Thus, the perception of ‘shear sensitivity’ is still impacting on the development of animal cell culture at the commercial scale. Microcarrier culture is also briefly addressed. Finally, some recommendations for bioreactor configuration and operating strategy are given.

Keywords

Large-scale bioreactors ‘Shear sensitivity’ Homogeneity pH control Dissolved CO2 Osmolality 

References

  1. Amanullah A, Nienow AW, Buckland BC (2003) Mixing in the fermentation and cell culture industries. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (eds) Handbook of industrial mixing; science and practice, ch. 18. Wiley-Interscience, N.Y, pp 1071–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assirelli M, Bujalski W, Eaglesham A, Nienow AW (2005) Intensifying micromixing in a semi-batch reactor using a Rushton turbine. Chem Eng Sci 60:2333–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aunins JG, Croughan MS, Wang DIC, Goldstein JM (1986) Engineering developments in homogeneous culture of animal cells: oxygenation of reactors and scale up. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp 17:699–723Google Scholar
  4. Aunins JG, Glazomitsky K, Buckland BC (1993) Cell culture reactor design: known and unknown. In: Nienow AW (ed) Proc. 3rd int. conf. on bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics. Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd., London, pp 175–190. ISBN 0 85298 873 7Google Scholar
  5. Boon LA, Hoeks FWJMM, van der Lans RJM, Bujalski W, Wolff MO, Nienow AW (2002) Comparing a range of impellers for “stirring as foam disruption” (SAFD). Biochem Eng J 10:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boraston R, Thompson PW, Garland S, Birch JR (1984) Growth and oxygen requirements of antibody producing mouse hybridoma cells in suspension culture. Develop Biol Standard 55:103–111Google Scholar
  7. Boulton-Stone JM (1995) The effect of surfactant on bursting gas bubbles. J Fluid Mech 302:231–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulton-Stone JM, Blake JR (1993) Gas bubbles bursting at a free surface. J Fluid Mech 254:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers JJ, Bavarian F (1991), Microscopic visualisation of insect cell-bubble interactions. ii: The bubble film and bubble rupture. Biotechnol Prog 7:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherry RS, Papoutsakis ET (1989) Growth and death rates of bovine embryonic kidney cells in turbulent microcarrier bioreactors. Bioproc Eng 4:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu L, Robinson DK (2001) Industrial choices for protein production by large scale cell culture. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark JM, Hirtenstein MD (1981) Optimizing culture conditions for the production of animal cells in microcarrier culture. Ann NY Acad Sci 369:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croughan MS, Hamel JFP, Wang DIC (1987) Hydrodynamic effects on animal cultures grown in microcarrier cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 29:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croughan MS, Hamel JFP, Wang DIC (1988) Effects of microcarrier concentration in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dey D (1998) Cell–bubble interactions during bubble disengagement in aerated bioreactors. PhD Thesis, The University of Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. de Zengotita VM, Schmelzer AE, Miller WM (2002) Characterisation of hybridoma cell responses to elevated pCO2 and osmolality: intracellular pH, cell size, apoptosis and metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enfors S-O, Nienow AW, et al. (2001) Physiological responses to mixing in large-scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol 85:175–185Google Scholar
  18. Garnier A, Voyer R, Tom R, Perret S, Jardin B, Kamen A (1996) Dissolved carbon dioxide accumulation in a large scale and high density production of TGFβ receptor with baculovirus infected Sf-9 cells. Cytotechnology 22:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorenflo VM, Ritter JB, Aschllman DB, Druin H, Bowen BD, Piret JM (2005) Characterisation and optimisation of acoustic filter performance by experimental design methodology. Biotechnol Bioeng 90:746–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gray DR, Chen S, Howarth W, Inlow D, Maiorella BL (1996) CO2 in large-scale and high-density CHO cell perfusion culture. Cytotechnology 22:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Handa-Corrigan A, Emery AN, Spier RE (1989) Effects of gas–liquid interfaces on the growth of suspended mammalian cells: mechanisms of cell damage by bubbles. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoeks, FWJMM, Khan M, Guter D, Willems M, Osman JJ, Mommers R, Wayte J (2004) Industrial applications of mixing and mass transfer studies. Alvin. W. Nienow’s Day; Stirred, Not Shaken Symposium, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibrahim S, Nienow AW (1996) Particle suspension in the turbulent regime: the effect of impeller type and impeller/vessel configurations. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 74:679–688Google Scholar
  24. Ibrahim S, Nienow AW (2004) The suspension of microcarriers for cell culture with axial flow impellers. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 82:1082–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jöbses I, Martens D, Tramper JJ (1991) Lethal events during gas sparging in animal cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:484–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kilburn DG, Webb FC (1968) The cultivation of animal cells at controlled dissolved oxygen partial pressure. Biotechnol Bioeng 10:801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kioukia N, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN (1992) The impact of fluid dynamics on the biological performance of free suspension animal cell culture: further studies. Food Bioprod Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 70:143–148Google Scholar
  28. Kioukia N, Al-Rubeai M, Zhang Z, Emery AN, Nienow AW, Thomas CR (1995) A study of uninfected and baculovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells in T-␣and spinner flasks. Biotech Lett 17:7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kioukia N, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN (1996) The influence of agitation and sparging on the growth rate and infection of insect cells in bioreactors and a comparison with hybridoma culture. Biotech Prog 12:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klopinger M, Fertig G, Fraune E, Miltenburger HG (1990) Multi-stage production of Autographa californica nuclear polyhydrosis virus in insect cell bioreactors. Cytotechnology 4:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kresta SM, Brodkey RS (2003) Turbulence in mixing applications. In: Paul EL, Atiemo-Obeng VA, Kresta SM (eds) Handbook of industrial mixing; science and practice, ch. 2. Wiley-Interscience, N.Y, pp 19–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langheinrich C, Nienow AW, Eddleston T, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH (1998) Liquid homogenisation studies in animal cell bioreactors of up to 8 m3 in volume. Food Bioprod Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 76:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langheinrich C, Nienow AW (1999) Control of pH in large scale, free suspension animal cell bioreactors: alkali addition and pH excursions. Biotechnol Bioeng 66:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langheinrich C, Nienow AW, Eddleston T, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH (2002) Oxygen transfer in stirred bioreactors under animal cell culture conditions. Food Bioproduct Proc (Trans I Chem E, Part C) 80:39–44Google Scholar
  35. MacIntyre F (1972) Flow patterns in breaking bubbles. J Fluid Mech 77:5211–5228Google Scholar
  36. Meier SJ, Hatton TA, Wang DIC (1999) Cell death from bursting bubbles: role of cell attachment to rising bubbles in sparged reactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meier SJ (2005) Cell culture scale-up: mixing, mass transfer, and use of appropriate scale-down models. Biochemical engineering XIV. Harrison Hot Springs, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  38. Moran E (2004) Recombinant protein production from mammalian cell culture: technologies and scale-up. Biochemical Engineering Research Network (BERN) Meeting, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
  39. Mostafa SS, Gu X (2003) Strategies for improved dCO2 removal in large-scale fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol Prog 19:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newitt DM, Dombrowski N, Knelman FH (1954) Liquid entrainment. 1. The mechanism of drop formation from gas or vapour bubbles. Trans I Chem E 32:244–261Google Scholar
  41. Nienow AW, Lavery M (1987) Oxygen transfer in animal cell culture medium. Biotechnol Bioeng 30:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nienow AW (1996) Gas–liquid mixing studies: a comparison of Rushton turbines with some modern impellers. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 74:417–423Google Scholar
  43. Nienow AW, Langheinrich C, Stevenson NC, Emery AN, Clayton TM, Slater NKH (1996) Homogenisation and oxygen transfer rates in large agitated and sparged animal cell bioreactors: some implications for growth and production. Cytotechnology 22:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nienow AW (1997a) The mixer as a reactor — liquid/solid systems. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (eds) Mixing in the process industries, 2nd edn (paperback revision, chapter 17. Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 394–411Google Scholar
  45. Nienow AW (1997b) The suspension of solid particles. In: Harnby N, Edwards MF, Nienow AW (eds) Mixing in the process industries, 2nd edn (paperback revision), chapter 17. Butterworth Heinemann, London, pp 364–393Google Scholar
  46. Nienow AW, Drain SM, Boyes AP, Carpenter KJ (1997) An experimental study to characterise imperfect macromixing in a stirred semi-batch reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:2984–2989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nienow AW (1998) Hydrodynamics of stirred bioreactors. In: Pohorecki R (ed) Fluid mechanics problems in biotechnology. App Mech Rev 51:3–2Google Scholar
  48. Nienow AW, Chamsart S, Patel H, Hitchcock AG, Hanak JAJ (2000) The development of a cell lysis reactor of 60 litres capacity for plasmid DNA production for gene therapy AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, Nov., Paper 284 gGoogle Scholar
  49. Nienow AW (2003) Aeration-biotechnology. In: Kirk Othmer encyclopaedia of chemical technology, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, published in the on-line edition of the Encyclopaedia on April 18thGoogle Scholar
  50. Nienow AW, Bujalski W (2004) The versatility of up-pumping hydrofoil agitators. Chem Eng Res Des (Trans I Chem E, Part A) 82:1073–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oh SKW, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN (1989) The effect of agitation intensity with and without continuous sparging on the growth and antibody production of hybridoma cells. J Biotechnol 12:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oh SKW, Nienow AW, Al-Rubeai M, Emery AN (1992) Further studies of the culture of mouse hybridomas in an agitated bioreactor with and without continuous sparging. J Biotechnol 22:245–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orton D, Wang DIC (1990) Effects of gas interfaces on animal cells in bubble aerated bioreactors. The 1990 Annual AIChE Meeting, Chicago, USA, Nov., paper 103bGoogle Scholar
  54. Osman JJ, Birch J, Varley J (2002) The response of GS-NSO myeloma cells to single and multiple pH perturbations. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:398–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ozturk SS (1996) Engineering challenges in high-density cell culture systems. Cytotechnology 22:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pullen KF, Johnson MD, Phillips AW, Ball GD, Finter NB (1985) Very large-scale suspension cultures of mammalian cells. Dev Biol Std 60:175–185Google Scholar
  57. Radlett PJ, Telling RC, Whiteside JP, Maskell, MA (1972) The supply of oxygen to submerged cultures of BHK21 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 34:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramirez OT, Mutharasan R (1990) The role of the plasma membrane fluidity on the shear sensitivity of hybridomas grown under hydrodynamic stress. Biotechnol Bioeng 36:911–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sinskey AJ, Fleischaker RJ, Tyo MA, Giard DJ, Wang DIC (1981) Production of cell-derived products: virus and interferon. Ann NY Acad Sci 369:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Telling RC, Elsworth R (1965) Submerged culture of hamster kidney cells in a stainless steel vessel. Biotechnol Bioeng 7:417–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Telling RC, Stone L (1964) A method of automatic pH control of a bicarbonate - CO2 buffer system for the submerged culture of hamster kidney cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 6:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tramper JJ, Joustra D, Vlak JM (1987) Bioreactor design for growth of shear-sensitive insect cells. In: Webb C, Mavituna F (eds) Plant and animal cell cultures: process possibilities. Ellis Horwood, Chichester UK, pp 125–136Google Scholar
  63. van Wezel AL (1985) Monolayer growth systems: homogeneous unit processes. In: Animal cell biotechnology. Academic Press Inc., London, pp 265–281Google Scholar
  64. Van’t Riet K, Tramper J (1991) Basic bioreactor design. Marcel Dekker, N.YGoogle Scholar
  65. Varley J, Birch J (1999) Reactor design for large-scale suspension animal cell culture. Cytotechnology 29:177–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Voisard D, Meuly F, Ruffieux PA, Baer G, Kadouri A (2003) Potential of cell retention techniques for large-scale high-density perfusion culture of suspended mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 82:751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wayte J, Boraston R, Bland H, Varley J, Brown M (1997) pH effects on growth and productivity of cell lines producing monoclonal antibody: control in large-scale fermentors. Cytotechnology 22:87–94Google Scholar
  68. Wu J (1995) Mechanisms of animal cell damage associated with gas bubbles and cell protection by medium additives. J Biotechnol 43:81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M, Thomas CR (1992) Effect of Pluronic F68 on the mechanical properties of mammalian cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:980–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang Z, Ferenczi MA, Thomas CR (1992) A micromanipulation technique with theoretical cell model for determining mechanical properties of single mammalian cells. Chem Eng Sci 47:1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1993) Modelling of animal cell damage in turbulent flows. In: Nienow AW (ed) Proc. 3rd int. conf. on bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics. Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd., London, pp 475–282. ISBN 0 85298 873 7Google Scholar
  72. Zhang Z, Al-Rubeai M, Thomas CR (1993) Comparison of the fragilities of several cell lines. Biotechnol Tech 7:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1996) Micromanipulation — a powerful technique for measuring cell mechanical strength. In: Microsystem technology for chemical and biological microreactors, DECHEMA Monographs, VCH, 132, 163–176, ISBN 3-527-10226-4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Bioprocess EngineeringThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations