Advertisement

Job Training and so Much More for Low-Income Older Adults: The Senior Community Service Employment Program

  • Cal J. HalvorsenEmail author
  • Olga Yulikova
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

An important anti-poverty program for older Americans is facing a serious problem: The Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) was deemed “ineffective” by the Department of Labor. The department’s 2020 budget, in fact, proposes the program’s elimination. SCSEP, which places low-income adults aged 55 and older with multiple barriers to work in on-the-job training in nonprofit and public agencies while providing a modest stipend, has the goal of helping participants to transition into unsubsidized, gainful employment. Yet measures used to determine the program’s effectiveness focus solely on employment outcomes, ignoring important outcomes related to health and social engagement. This commentary advocates for the preservation of SCSEP by countering the view that it is purely an employment intervention for low-income older adults. We describe the complexity of the program and the people it serves and argue that using select measures that do not encompass the breadth of SCSEP’s benefits creates an inaccurate appearance of ineffectiveness. We conclude with recommendations for SCSEP administrators and grantees, social workers, and others to enhance the promise of this important program.

Keywords

SCSEP Older workers Workforce training Federal budget Policy Older Americans Act Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anne D. Womer for her contributions to this manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare no sources of funding for this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Olga Yulikova, MA, has directed the Senior Community Service Employment Program in the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs for more than 10 years. Arguments in this manuscript represent her personal views and do not represent the official positions of her program or employer. Cal J. Halvorsen declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aday, R. H., & Kehoe, G. (2008). Working in old age: Benefits of participation in the Senior Community Service Employment Program. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health,23(1–2), 125–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240802189521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albelda, R., & Carr, M. (2017). Combining earnings with public supports: Cliff effects in Massachusetts (Economics Faculty Publication Series No. 42). University of Massachusetts Boston. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://scholarworks.umb.edu/econ_faculty_pubs/42/
  3. Anderson, K. A., Richardson, V. E., Fields, N. L., & Harootyan, R. A. (2013). Inclusion or exclusion? Exploring barriers to employment for low-income older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work,56(4), 318–334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2013.777006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britt, E., Sawatzky, R., & Swibaker, K. (2018). Motivational interviewing to promote employment. Journal of Employment Counseling,55(4), 176–189.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carolan, K., Gonzales, E., Lee, K., & Harootyan, R. A. (2018). Institutional and individual factors affecting health and employment for low-income women with chronic health conditions. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B..  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crystal, S., Shea, D. G., & Reyes, A. M. (2016). Cumulative advantage, cumulative disadvantage, and evolving patterns of late-life inequality. The Gerontologist.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw056.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzales, E., Lee, K., & Harootyan, B. (2019). Voices from the field: Ecological factors that promote employment and health among low-income older adults with implications for direct social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00719-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, L. B. (2007a, June 6). Annual message to the Congress on the state of the union. Retrieved Jan 4, 1965 from The Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library website: http://www.lbjlibrary.net/collections/selected-speeches/1965/01-04-1965.html
  10. Johnson, L. B. (2007b, June 6). Annual message to the Congress on the state of the union. Retrieved Jan 8, 1964 from The Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library website: http://www.lbjlibrary.net/collections/selected-speeches/november-1963-1964/01-08-1964.html
  11. Johnson, R., & Gosselin, P. (2018). How secure is employment at older ages? [Research report]. Urban Institute. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/99570/how_secure_is_employment_at_older_ages_2.pdf
  12. Kondrat, M. E. (2002). Actor-centered social work: Re-visioning “person-in-environment” through a critical theory lens. Social Work,47(4), 435–448.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.4.435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kondrat, M. E. (2013). Person-in-environment. Encyclopedia of Social Work.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lam, C. S., Wiley, A. H., Siu, A., & Emmett, J. (2010). Assessing readiness to work from a stages of change perspective: Implications for return to work. Work,37, 321–329.  https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2010-1085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McBride, A. M., Gonzales, E., Morrow-Howell, N., & McCrary, S. (2011). Stipends in volunteer civic service: Inclusion, retention, and volunteer benefits. Public Administration Review,71(6), 850–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,2001(89), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MetLife Foundation, & Civic Ventures. (2008). Pathways to encore careers: How 10 community colleges are preparing boomers for work. Retrieved March 3, 2019 from https://encore.org/wp-content/uploads/files/ECCreport%5B1%5D.pdf
  18. Mikelson, K. S. (2017). The role of SCSEP in workforce training for low-income older workers (p. 15) [White paper]. Urban Institute. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/94371/2001575_scsep_white_paper_finalized_2.pdf
  19. Mikelson, K. S., Kuehn, D., & Martin-Caughey, A. (2017). Occupational projections for low-income older workers [Research report]. Urban Institute. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/aarp_foundation/2017/pdfs/occupational-projections-for-low-income-older-workers.pdf
  20. Miller, W. R. (1983). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers. Behavioural Psychotherapy,11(02), 147.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0141347300006583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrow-Howell, N., Gonzales, E., Matz-Costa, C., & Greenfield, E. A. (2015). Increasing productive engagement in later life (Working Paper No. 8). American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. Retrieved August 14, 2019 from http://grandchallengesforsocialwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/WP8-with-cover.pdf
  22. Office of Management and Budget. (2018). An American budget: Major savings and reforms [Fiscal Year 2019]. U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/msar-fy2019.pdf
  23. Older Americans Act of 1965 [As amended through P.L. 114-114]. (2016). Retrieved April 5, 2019 from https://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Older%20Americans%20Act%20Of%201965.pdf
  24. Social Policy Research Associates, & Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (2012). Evaluation of the Senior Community Service Employment Program [Process and Outcomes Study Final Report]. Retrieved April 2, 2019 from https://wdr.doleta.gov/research/FullText_Documents/ETAOP_2013_03.pdf
  25. Tang, F., Morrow-Howell, N., & Hong, S. (2009). Inclusion of diverse older populations in volunteering: The importance of institutional Facilitation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,38(5), 810–827.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008320195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toossi, M., & Torpey, E. (2017). Older workers: Labor force trends and career options. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2017/article/older-workers.htm
  27. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2015, November 23). Poverty Guidelines. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines
  28. U.S. Department of Labor. (2018). FY 2019 Department of Labor budget in brief. Retrieved April 5, 2019 from https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/general/budget/2019/FY2019BIB.pdf
  29. U.S. Department of Labor. (2019). Instructions for Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP): Optional Requests Program Year 2019 (Training and Employment Guidance Letter No. 18–18; p. 3).Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration. (2018a). PY 2017 participant evaluation of SCSEP. Retrieved April 2, 2019 from https://www.doleta.gov/Seniors/pdf/Participant_Survey_Report/PY2017_Nationwide_Participant_Survey_Report.pdf
  31. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration. (2018b, August 20). Senior Community Service Employment Program. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.doleta.gov/seniors/
  32. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration. (2019). Training and employment guidance letter: Attachment 9: Senior Community Service Employment Program (No. 14–18). Retrieved April 2, 2019 from https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=7611
  33. U.S. Government Printing Office. (1973). Older Americans Comprehensive Services Amendments of 1973 [Committee Print for the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging]. Retrieved April 5, 2019 from https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/reports/rpt473.pdf
  34. U.S. Government Printing Office. (2018). Senior Community Service Employment Program; Performance Accountability [Federal Register, Vol. 83, No. 146]. Retrieved from https://www.doleta.gov/Seniors/pdf/SCSEP_Performance_Accountability_Final_Rule_2018-16216_7_27_18.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston College School of Social WorkChestnut HillUSA
  2. 2.Senior Community Service Employment ProgramMassachusetts Executive Office of Elder AffairsBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations