Advertisement

#socialwork: Informal Use of Information and Communication Technology in Social Work

  • Faye Mishna
  • Jane SandersEmail author
  • Sophia Fantus
  • Lin Fang
  • Andrea Greenblatt
  • Marion Bogo
  • Betsy Milne
Original Paper

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have transformed social realms and professional fields of practice including social work. Research is lacking on informal ICT use and its impact on clinical social work. The purpose of the current study was to examine social workers’ informal ICT use with clients between sessions as an adjunct to face-to-face practice, and thus contribute to the paucity of literature on this phenomenon. An online survey, #socialwork, was distributed among social workers with direct client contact, across Canada (n = 2609) and the U.S. (n = 1225), to capture informal ICT use. Findings indicate that informal ICT use by social workers is ubiquitous and consistent across both countries. Older and more experienced practitioners, and social workers in private practice settings and who provide psychotherapy were among the highest users. The findings related to social media and increased interaction outside of work hours reveal that ICTs are impacting the working relationship. Many of the social workers were not aware of a workplace policy on informal ICT use and report that they do not talk with either their supervisors or peers about their informal ICT use with clients. Given the frequency of informal ICT use within social work practice, significantly more attention is required in research, education and practice.

Keywords

Information and communication technology Social work and social media Social work Working relationship Clinical social work Ecological systems framework Technological acceptance model 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 435-2016-0600).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aguilera, A., & Muñoz, R. F. (2011). Text messaging as an adjunct to CBT in low-income populations: A usability and feasibility pilot study. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 42(6), 472–478.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025499.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhuvaneswar, C. G., & Gutheil, T. G. (2008). E-mail and psychiatry: Some psychotherapeutic and psychoanalytic perspectives. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 62(3), 241–261.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2008.62.3.241.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Boydell, K. M., Hodgins, M., Pignatiello, A., Teshima, J., Edwards, H., & Willis, D. (2014). Using technology to deliver mental health services to children and youth: A scoping review. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 23(2), 87–99.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J., Ryan, C., & Harris, A. (2014). How doctors view and use social media: A national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e267.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3589.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock, A., & Colvin, A. (2015). Communication technology integration into social work practice. Advances in Social Work, 16(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butcher, J. N., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 331–345.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10267.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrilio, T. E. (2007). Using client information systems in practice settings: Factors affecting social workers’ use of information systems. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(4), 41–62.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v25n04_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CASW. (2014). Social media use and social work practice (p. 13). Ottawa: CASW.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, C. (2016). A scoping review of social media use in social work practice. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 13(3), 263–276.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2015.1052908.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, C., & Holosko, M. J. (2016). A review of information and communication technology enhanced social work interventions. Research on Social Work Practice, 26(1), 88–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515578884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chau, P. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information System, 13(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clough, B. A., & Casey, L. M. (2011). Technological adjuncts to enhance current psychotherapy practices: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 279–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.008.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cranen, K., Veld, R., Ijzerman, M., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. (2011). Change of patients’ perceptions of telemedicine after brief use. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 17(7), 530–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Csiernik, R., Furze, P., Dromgole, L., & Rishchynski, G. M. (2008). Information technology and social work: The dark side or light side? Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3(3–4), 9–25.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J394v03n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dombo, E. A., Kays, L., & Weller, K. (2014). Clinical social work practice and technology: Personal, practical, regulatory, and ethical considerations for the twenty-first century. Social Work in Health Care, 53(9), 900–919.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.948585.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunn, K. (2012). A qualitative investigation into the online counselling relationship: To meet or not to meet, that is the question. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12(4), 316–326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.669772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falkenstrom, F., Granstrom, F., & Holmqvist, R. (2014). Working alliance predicts psychotherapy outcome even while controlling for prior symptom improvement. Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 146–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang, L., Al-Raes, M., & Zhang, V. F. (2018). The use of social media by faculty and field instructors in social work education. Presented at the Society for Social Work and Research 22nd Annual Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://sswr.confex.com/sswr/2018/webprogram/Paper32990.html.
  20. Fang, L., Mishna, F., Zhang, V. F., Wert, M. V., & Bogo, M. (2014). Social media and social work education: Understanding and dealing with the new digital world. Social Work in Health Care, 53(9), 800–814.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.943455.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fantus, S., & Mishna, F. (2013). The ethical and clinical implications of utilizing cybercommunication in face-to-face therapy. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 83(4), 466–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2013.833049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finn, J. (2006). An exploratory study of email use by direct service social workers. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(4), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v24n04_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finn, J., & Barak, A. (2010). A descriptive study of e-counsellor attitudes, ethics, and practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 10(4), 268–277.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140903380847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foeday J. K. (2011). Social work in the ICT age: How to ensure ethical and competent practice in the 21st century and beyond. Academia.edu. Retrieved October 5, 2015 from http://www.academia.edu/1172248/Social_Work_in_the_ICT_Age_How_to_Ensure_Ethical_and_Competent_Practice_in_the_21st_Century_and_Beyond.
  25. Freeman, K. A., Duke, D. C., & Harris, M. A. (2013). Behavioral health care for adolescents with poorly controlled diabetes via Skype: Does working alliance remain intact? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 7(3), 727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gabbard, G. O. (2001). Cyberpassion: E-rotic transference on the Internet. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 70(4), 719–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gabbard, G. O., Kassaw, K. A., & Perez-Garcia, G. (2011). Professional boundaries in the era of the Internet. Academic Psychiatry, 35, 168–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldfarb, J., Kayssi, A., Devon, K., Rossos, P. G., & Cil, T. D. (2016). Smartphones and patient care exploring the use of text-based messaging for patient-related communication. Surgical Innovation, 23(3), 305–308.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350615624788.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Gonchar, N., & Adams, J. R. (2000). Living in cyberspace. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(3), 587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2000.10779030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haight, M., Quan-Haase, A., & Corbett, B. A. (2014). Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: The impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 503–519.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.891633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanley, T., & Reynolds, D. (2009). Counselling psychology and the Internet: A review of the quantitative research into online outcomes and alliances within text based therapy. Counselling Psychology Review, 24(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  32. Harrington, R. (2015). Friend request: The analytic frame revisited. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 51(4), 704–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hollis, F. (1970). Casework: A psychosocial theory (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  34. Holmes, C., & Foster, V. (2012). A preliminary comparison study of online and face-to-face counseling: Client perceptions of three factors. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(1), 14–31.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.662848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horvath, A., Del Re, A. C., Fluckiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Howard, P. N., Busch, L., & Sheets, P. (2010). Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, G. M. (2010). Internet use and child development: The techno-microsystem. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 10, 32–43.Google Scholar
  38. Kezelman, C., & Stavropoulos, P. (2012). “The last frontier”: Practice guidelines for the treatment of complex trauma and trauma informed care and service delivery. Sydney: Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA).Google Scholar
  39. Kimball, E., & Kim, J. (2013). Virtual boundaries: Ethical considerations for use of social media in social work. Social Work, 58(2), 185–188.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt005.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Kirwan, G., & Guckin, C. M. (2014). Digital natives or digitally naïve? E-professionalism and ethical dilemmas among newly graduated teachers and social workers in Ireland. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1–2), 119–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2013.858096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knight, C. (2015). Trauma-informed social work practice: Practice considerations and challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(1), 25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0481-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kooistra, L. C., Wiersma, J. E., Ruwaard, J., van Oppen, P., Smit, F., Lokkerbol, J., … Riper, H. (2014). Blended vs. face-to-face cognitive behavioural treatment for major depression in specialized mental health care: Study protocol of a randomized controlled cost-effectiveness trial. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 290.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0290-z.
  43. Lewis, J., Coursol, D., Khan, L., & Wilson, A. (2000). Life in a dot.com world: Preparing counselors to work with technology. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED449410.
  44. Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, J., & Alaggia, R. (2013). Sexual abuse images in cyberspace: Expanding the ecology of the child. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 22(4), 398–415.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2013.781091.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. McMahon, R., O’Donnell, S., Smith, R., Walmark, B., Beaton, B., & Simmonds, J. (2011). Digital divides and the “first mile”: Framing first nations broadband development in Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal.  https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2011.2.2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., Sawyer, J.-L., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(3), 277–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., & Fantus, S. (2014). Here to stay: Cyber communication as a complement in social work practice. Families in Society, 95(3), 179–186.  https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2014.95.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mishna, F., Bogo, M., & Sawyer, J.-L. (2015). Cyber counseling: Illuminating benefits and challenges. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(2), 169–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-013-0470-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mishna, F., Fantus, S., & McInroy, L. B. (2017). Informal use of information and communication technology: Adjunct to traditional face-to-face social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45, 49–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0576-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murdoch, J. W., & Connor-Greene, P. A. (2000). Enhancing therapeutic impact and therapeutic alliance through electronic mail homework assignments. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9(4), 232–237.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. NASW. (2018). The NASW code of ethics. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
  53. Newell, J. M., & Nelson-Gardell, D. (2014). A competency-based approach to teaching professional self-care: An ethical consideration for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(3), 427–439.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.917928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nieminen, H. (2016). Digital divide and beyond: What do we know of Information and Communications Technology’s long-term social effects? Some uncomfortable questions. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 19–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115614198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parrott, L., & Madoc-Jones, I. (2008). Reclaiming information and communication technologies for empowering social work practice. Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 181–197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017307084739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 67–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peterson, M. R., & Beck, R. L. (2003). E-mail as an adjunctive tool in psychotherapy: Response and responsibility. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 57(2), 167–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phan, K. (2011). Exploring technology acceptance for mobile services. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Preschl, B., Maercker, A., & Wagner, B. (2011). The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 189.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-189.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards, D., & Viganó, N. (2013). Online counseling: A narrative and critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(9), 994–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21974.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, D., & Garrett, P. M. (2018). Social work ‘logged on’: Contemporary dilemmas in an evolving ‘techno-habitat’. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1278520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schottenbauer, M. A., Glass, C. R., Arnkoff, D. B., & Gray, S. H. (2008). Contributions of psychodynamic approaches to treatment of PTSD and trauma: a review of the empirical treatment and psychopathology literature. Psychiatry, 71(1), 13–34.  https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2008.71.1.13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Singleton, R., & Straits, B. C. (2010). Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press. (http://go.utlib.ca/cat/7267800).
  64. van de Wal, M. A., Gielissen, M. F., Servaes, P., Knoop, H., Speckens, A. E., & Prins, J. B. (2015). Study protocol of the SWORD-study: A randomised controlled trial comparing combined online and face-to-face cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual in managing fear of cancer recurrence. BMC Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0068-1.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. van der Vaart, R., Witting, M., Riper, H., Kooistra, L., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. J. (2014). Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: Content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 355.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wampold, B. E., & Budge, S. L. (2012). The 2011 Leona Tyler award address: The Relationship—And its relationship to the common and specific factors of psychotherapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(4), 601–623.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000011432709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, E. V., & Lankton, N. K. (2004). Modeling patients’ acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 11(4), 241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1475.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social WorkUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of Texas at ArlingtonSchool of Social WorkArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations