Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 394–405 | Cite as

Discourses of Migration and Belonging: How Language Shapes the Return-Thinking Processes of Ethiopians in Canada

  • Mary GoitomEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examined how 15 Ethiopian-Canadian immigrants define and express their post-migration intentions. Specifically, this paper explores how the linguistic and cultural features embedded in language inform their return-thinking process. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship that expands the dominant conceptualization of language and migration to include a focus on how language becomes integral to the experience of migration through beliefs and value systems. Particularly, this paper argues that it is essential to recognize the multifaceted nature of migration, language, identity, and transnationalism and to recognize how migrants’ agency in straddling two distinct societies shapes their return-thinking process.

Keywords

Language Identity Transnationalism Migration Ethiopians Return-Thinking 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by Minor Research Grant (LA&PS Council).

References

  1. Anderson, K., & Jack, D. C. (1991). Learning to listen: Interview techniques and analyses. In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 11–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Andreouli, E. (2010). Identity, positioning and self-other relations. Papers on Social Representations. 19, 14.1–14.13.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bariagaber, A. (2006). Conflict and the refugee experience: Flight, exile and repatriation in the Horn of Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Basch, L., Glick-Schiller, N., & Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound. Langhorne: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  6. Bashi, V. F. (2007). Survival of the knitted: Immigrant social networks in a stratified world. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, J. B. (2009). Multilingualism, citizenship, and identity. Voices of youth and symbolic investments in an urban, globalized world. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Danso, R. (2001). From “There” to “Here”: An investigation of the initial settlement experiences of Ethiopian and Somali refugees in Toronto. GeoJournal, 55, 3–14.Google Scholar
  18. De Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S., Ross, R., & Rusk, T. B. (2007). Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1137–1148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckstein, S. (2009). The immigrant divide: How Cuban Americans changed the US and their homeland. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2013). Migrant balancing acts: understanding the interactions between integration and transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 867–884.Google Scholar
  22. Faist, T. (2010). Towards transnational studies: World theories, transnationalisation and changing institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 10, 1665–1687.Google Scholar
  23. Foner, N. (2003). American arrivals: Anthropology engages the new immigration. Santa Fe: SAR Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for space in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.Google Scholar
  25. Goitom, M. (2016). “Living in our own world”: Parental influence on the identity development of second-generation Ethiopian and Eritrean youth during their formative years. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17/4, 1163–1180.Google Scholar
  26. Goitom, M. (2017). “Unconventional Canadians”: Second-generation “Habesha” youth and belonging in Toronto, Canada. Global Social Welfare, 4, 179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-017-0098-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomez, R., & Vannini, S. (2017). Notions of home and sense of belonging in the context of migration in a journey through participatory photography. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 78, 1–46.Google Scholar
  28. Guarnizo, L. E., & Smith, M. P. (1998). The locations of transnationalism. In M. P. Smith & L. E. Guarnizo (Eds.), Transnationalism from below (pp. 3–34). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hassen, R. (2016). Language as an index of identity, power, solidarity and sentiment in the multicultural community of Wollo. Journal of Socialomics, 5(3), 1–5.Google Scholar
  31. Itzigsohn, J., & Giorguli-Saucedo, S. (2005). Incorporation, transnationalism, and gender: Immigrant incorporation and transnational participating as gendered processes. International Migration Review, 39(4), 895–920.Google Scholar
  32. Jacquemet, M. (2010). Language and transnational spaces. In P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variations (pp. 50–69). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  33. Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2008). Migration and globalization: Challenges and perspectives for the research infrastructure (Discussion Paper No. 3890). Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp3890.pdf.
  34. Korteweg, A. C. (2017). The failures of “immigrant integration”: The gendered racialized production of non-belonging. Migration Studies, 5, 3, 428–444.Google Scholar
  35. Kramsch, C. (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization. Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. What foreign language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Liebscher, G., & Daily-O’Cain, J. (2013). Language, space, and identity in migration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Maehlum, B. (2010). Language and social spaces. In P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation (pp. 18–31). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2001). Ghosts and shadows: Construction of identity and community in an African diaspora. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  40. Matt, J. S. (2007). You can’t go home again: Homesickness and nostalgia in U.S. history. The Journal of American History, 94(2), 469–497.Google Scholar
  41. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1996). Qualitative research in health care. London: BMJ.Google Scholar
  42. Quinn, S. (2012, June 1). Why do so many Canadians see ethnic enclaves as a threat? The Globe and Mail, Retrieved from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/why-do-so-many-canadians-see-ethnic-enclaves-as-a-threat/article4226087/.
  43. Saenz, R. Y. (2012). Globalization, migration, and national identity: A global perspective on the role of education in second-generation Immigrants. International Journal on Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 191–195.Google Scholar
  44. Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & Jain, N. C. (1981). Understanding intercultural communication. Belmont: Wandsworth Inc.Google Scholar
  45. Shenk, P. S. (2007). “I’m Mexican, remember?”: Constructing ethnic identities via authenticating discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), 194–220.Google Scholar
  46. Speziale, H. J. S., & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (4th edn.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  47. Squires, A. (2008). Language barriers and qualitative nursing research: methodological considerations. International Nursing Review, 55(3), 265–273.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Statistics Canada. (2016). 2016 Census program—national household survey. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
  49. Stevenson, P., & Carl, J. (2010). Language and social change in Central Europe: Discourses on policy, identity, and the German language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Suarez-Orozco, C. (2003). Formulating identity in a globalized world. In M. M. Suarez-Orozco & D. B. Qin-Hilliard (Eds.), Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 173–202). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Tan, S. L., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1999). Positioning in intergroup relations. In R. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional actions (pp. 178–194). Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Teram, E., Schachter, C. L., & Stalker, C. A. (2005). The case for integrating grounded theory and participatory action research: Empowering clients to inform professional practice. Qualitative Health Research, 15(8), 1129–1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Walther, M. (2014). Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice as Theoretical Framework. In Repatriation to France and Germany. mir-Edition. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Work, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations