‘There’s Just All These Moving Parts:’ Helping Domestic Violence Survivors Obtain Housing
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most common and devastating forms of violence occurring worldwide. Being victimized by an intimate partner or ex-partner can lead to numerous negative consequences for survivors and their children, including physical and mental health problems as well as housing instability and financial devastation. IPV is a leading cause of homelessness, and helping IPV survivors obtain affordable housing is a growing focus of staff working within domestic violence victim service programs. Unfortunately, in this time of decreasing resources, funders are expecting programs to serve an increasing number of survivors, putting advocates in the precarious position of feeling that they lack the time to provide the effort needed to adequately serve survivors with multiple needs. The purpose of this study was to better understand the complexities involved in helping IPV survivors obtain safe and stable housing, and reflect on the importance of integrating critical reflection, intersectionality, and key principles of social work practice into this important work. In-depth interviews with 11 advocates illustrated how time-consuming and complicated it can be to successfully house IPV survivors. Themes focused on: (1) the need to understand and continually address safety; (2) the need to understand and continually address trauma; (3) the importance of community connections; (4) the time-consuming nature of system factors; and (5) the importance of addressing multiple, interrelated issues and not just housing. Policy implications are discussed.
KeywordsDomestic violence Housing Social service Advocacy
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of Michigan State University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Albanese, T. (2010). Performance measurement of homeless systems. Retrieved on August 27, 2016 from http://westernmasshousingfirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/PerfMeasurementHomelessSystems_Presentation.pdf.
- Beydoun, H. A., Beydoun, M. A., Kaufman, J. S., Lo, B., & Zonderman, A. B. (2012). Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- Danis, F. (2004). Factors that influence domestic violence practice self-efficacy: Implications for social work. Advances in Social Work, 5, 150–161.Google Scholar
- DiNitto, D. M., & Johnson, D. H. (2015). Social welfare: Politics and public policy. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Fleming, P. J., McCleary-Sills, J., Morton, M., Levtov, R., Heilman, B., & Barker, G. (2015). Risk factors for men’s lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES) in eight countries. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ford-Gilboe, M., Wuest, J., Varcoe, C., Davies, L., Merritt-Gray, M., Campbell, J., et al. (2009). Modeling the effects of intimate partner violence and access to resources on women’s health in the early years after leaving an abusive partner. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1021–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gutiérrez, L. M., & Lewis, E. A. (1999). Empowering women of color. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Jasinski, J. L., Wesely, J. K., Mustaine, E., & Wright, J. D. (2002). The experience of violence in the lives of homeless women: A research project. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Joint Center for Housing Studies, of Harvard University. (2013). The State of the Nation’s Housing 2013. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- LeGeros, M., & Savage Borne, J. (2014). Building bridges: Training social work students in domestic violence work. Field Educator: Simmons School of Social Work, 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- National Alliance to End Homelessness. (2015). The state of homelessness in America 2015. Washington, DC: National Alliance to End Homelessness. Retrieved from http://endhomeless-ness.org/library/entry/the-state-of-homelessness-in-america-2015.
- National Fair Housing Alliance. (2015). Where you live matters: 2015 fair housing trends report. Washington, DC: National Fair Housing Alliance. Retrieved August 28, 2016 from https://www.nationalfairhousing.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=SYWmBgwpazA%3d&tabid=3917&mid=5321.
- National Housing Law Project (2014). VAWA 2013 continues vital housing protections for survivors and provides new safeguards. Washington, DC: National Housing Law Project. Retrieved December 31, 2017 from http://nhlp.org/files/VAWA-2013-Bulletin-Article-Jan-2014-updated.pdf.
- National Low Income Housing Coalition. (2016). Out of reach 2016: No refuge for low income renters. Washington, DC: National Low Income Housing Coalition. Retrieved February 12, 2017 from http://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/oor/OOR_2016.pdf.
- Proctor, B. D., Semega, J. L., & Kollar, M. A. (2016). Income and poverty in the United States: 2015. U.S. census bureau, current population reports, P60-256(RV). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Radford, L., Corral, S., Bradley, C., & Fisher, H. L. (2013). The prevalence and impact of childmaltreatment and other types of victimization in the UK: Findings from a population survey of caregivers, children and young people and young adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, C. M. (2016). Examining the work of domestic violence programs within a “social and emotional well-being promotion” conceptual framework. Harrisburg, PA: National Resource Center on Domestic Violence (NRCDV). Retrieved August 26, 2016 from http://www.dvevidenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/DVEvidence-Services-ConceptualFramework-2016.pdf.
- Sullivan, C. M., Bomsta, H. D., & Hacskaylo, M. A. (2016). Evidence that flexible funding is a promising strategy to prevent homelessness for survivors of intimate partner violence: A longitudinal pilot study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516664318.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan, C. M., & Olsen, L. (2016). Common ground, complementary approaches: Adapting the housing first model for domestic violence survivors. Seattle, WA: Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Rapid re-housing: ESG vs CoC. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved August 27, 2016 from https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/ documents/Rapid_Re-Housing_ESG_vs_CoC.pdf.
- Warshaw, C., Brashler, P., & Gil, J. (2009). Mental health consequences of intimate partner violence. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 147–171). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilder Research Center. (2007). Overview of homelessness in Minnesota 2006: Key facts from the statewide survey. Saint Paul, MN: Wilder Research Center.Google Scholar