Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 159–168 | Cite as

Connecting Without Fear: Clinical Implications of the Consumption of Information and Communication Technologies by Sexual Minority Youth and Young Adults

  • Shelley L. Craig
  • Lauren B. McInroy
  • Lance T. McCready
  • Dane Marco Di Cesare
  • Lincoln D. Pettaway
Original Paper

Abstract

Adolescents are coming of age in a rapidly changing media landscape with the increased integration of online information and communication technologies (ICTs) (e.g., internet, social media, photo/video sharing) into contemporary society. Sexual minority youth and young adults (SMYYA) may be particularly avid users of both offline and online ICTs. Despite the presence of considerable risk factors (e.g., cyber bullying, exploitation, overuse and addiction), ICTs may simultaneously provide substantial benefits for SMYYA, who often experience disproportionate social exclusion and victimization in their homes, schools and communities as a direct result of their sexual minority status. This grounded theory investigation used semi-structured interviews to consider the types of ICTs utilized by a sample (n = 19) of urban SMYYA (ages 18–22), and examined the importance ascribed by participants to their use of these technologies. Participants were selected for their active use of multiple types of ICTs, and considered their engagement with technology to be a critical feature of their daily lives and development. In contrast to their offline existence, online ICTs offered SMYYA significantly safer spaces and vital community support. Many of the participants also indicated the potential of ICTs to enhance face-to-face clinical work to foster SMYYA’s healthy growth and facilitate their connectedness. Specific implications for practice with SMYYA, including strategies to develop knowledge about ICTs, educate youth about the risks and opportunities online, and integrate ICTs into supportive therapeutic settings are described.

Keywords

Sexual minority youth Social media Gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender youth Information and communication technology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

To the amazing youth participants who generously provided their time and insight. This study was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Grant (#491406).

References

  1. Alexander, J., & Losh, E. (2010). “A YouTube of one’s own?”: “Coming out” videos as rhetorical action. In C. Pullen & M. Cooper (Eds.), LGBT identity and online new media (pp. 37–50). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burrow-Sanchez, J. J., Call, M. E., Zheng, R., & Drew, C. J. (2011). How school counselors can help prevent online victimization. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2013). The relationship of cumulative stressors, chronic illness and abuse to the self-reported suicide risk of Black and Hispanic sexual minority youth. The Journal of Community Psychology, 41(7), 783–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2014). You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health, 18(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L., Allaggia, R., & McCready, L. (2014). Like picking up a seed, but you haven’t planted it”: Queer youth analyze the It Gets Better Project. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies., 1, 204–219.Google Scholar
  8. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L., Austin, A., Smith, M., & Engle, B. (2012). Promoting self-efficacy and self-esteem for multiethnic sexual minority youth: An evidence-informed intervention. Journal of Social Service Research, 38(5), 688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, S. L., McInroy, L. B., McCready, L. T., & Alaggia, R. (accepted). Media: A catalyst for resilience in sexual minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth. Google Scholar
  10. Craig, S. L., & Smith, M. (2014). The impact of perceived discrimination and social support on the school performance of multiethnic sexual minority youth. Youth and Society, 46, 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Intervention and prevention strategies. Communique, 38(4), 1–5.Google Scholar
  13. Fleming, M. J., Greentree, S., Cocotti-Muller, D., Elias, K. A., & Morrison, S. (2006). Safety in cyberspace: Adolescents’ safety and exposure online. Youth and Society, 38(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GLSEN, CiPHR, & CCRC. (2013). Out online: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth on the Internet. New York, NY: GLSEN. Retrieved from, http://www.glsen.org/learn/reasearch/national/out-online.
  15. Gray, M. L. (2009). Negotiating identities/queering desires: Coming out online and the remediation of the coming-out story. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1162–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 392–402.Google Scholar
  17. Guan, S. A., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2009). Youth Internet use: Risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 351–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillier, L., & Harrison, L. (2007). Building realities less limited than their own: Young people practising same-sex attraction on the internet. Sexualities, 10(1), 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 125–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, L., & Branson, R. (2012). Counselors’ guidelines for the healthy development of youth in the digital age. American Counseling Association VISTAS, 1. Retrieved from, http://www.counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas12/Article_40.pdf.
  21. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth internet victimization: Findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000–2010. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 179–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2011). The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business Horizons, 54, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehr, W. (2012). Measuring the Internet: The data challenge. OECD Digital Economy Papers, 194. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from, doi: 10.1787/5k9bhk5fzvzx-en.
  25. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from, http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf.
  26. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: How American teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship”. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from, http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_teens_Kindness_Cruelty_SNS_Report_Nov_2011_FINAL_110711.pdf.
  27. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from, http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1484/social-media-mobile-internet-use-teens-millennials-fewer-blog.
  28. Levine, D. (2011). Using technology, new media, and mobile for sexual and reproductive health. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behaviors: An overview. Prevention Researcher, 17, 3–6.Google Scholar
  31. McCracken, G. (1998). The long interview, qualitative research methods (Vol. 13). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  32. McInroy, L., & Craig, S. L. (2012). Articulating identities: Language and practice with multiethnic sexual minority youth. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mishna, F., McLuckie, A., & Saini, M. (2009). Real-world dangers in an online reality: A qualitative study examining online relationships and cyber abuse. Social Work Research, 1(2), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreno, M. A., Egan, K. G., Bare, K., Young, H. N., & Cox, E. D. (2013). Internet safety education for youth: Stakeholder perspectives. BMC Public Health, 13, 543.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. National Association of Social Workers, and Association of Social Work Boards. (2005). Technology and social work practice. Retrieved from, http://www.socialworkers.org/practice/standards/naswtechnologystandards.pdf.
  37. Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Resource and risk: Youth sexuality and new media use. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (n.d.) Trend Data (Teens). Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from, http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data-(Teens)/Whos-Online.aspx.
  39. Pujazon-Zazik, M., & Park, M. J. (2010). To tweet, or not to tweet: Gender differences and potential positive and negative health outcomes of adolescents’ social internet use. American Journal of Mens Health, 4, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rideout, V., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 818 year-olds. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from, http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.
  41. Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in media use. Future of Children, 18(1), 11–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosegrant, J. (2012). Introduction: Clinicians respond to their clients’ technology. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 68(11), 1161–1163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Saewyc, E. M. (2011). Research on adolescent sexual orientation: Development, health disparities, stigma, and resilience. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneider, S. K., O’Donnell, L., Stueve, A., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171–177.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Veenhof, B., Wellman, B., Quell, C., & Hogan, B. (2008). How Canadians’ use of the internet affects social life and civic participation. Statistics Canada, 16, 1–29. Retrieved from, http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2008/statcan/56F0004M/56f0004m2008016-eng.pdf.
  47. Wells, M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). How do high-risk youth use the internet? Characteristics and implications for prevention. Child Maltreatment, 13(3), 227–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wells, M., Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Blease, K. B. (2006). Mental health professionals’ exposure to clients with problematic internet experiences. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(4), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). How risky are social networking sites? A Comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics, 121(2), e350–e357. doi: 10.542/peds.2007-0693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelley L. Craig
    • 1
  • Lauren B. McInroy
    • 1
  • Lance T. McCready
    • 2
  • Dane Marco Di Cesare
    • 3
  • Lincoln D. Pettaway
    • 4
  1. 1.Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social WorkUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Learning and InstructionState University of New York BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  4. 4.American University of Ras Al KhaimahRas Al KhaimahUAE

Personalised recommendations