Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 192–204 | Cite as

The Three Fallacies: Evaluating Three Problematic Trends in Clinical Practice

Original Paper

Abstract

In an era of condensed treatment and managed care, three trends are gaining prevalence in some graduate training programs and in some circles of the practicing community, limiting clinicians from utilizing the therapeutic techniques needed to help a client achieve long-standing intrapsychic change, a precondition for maintaining therapeutic gains post treatment. The first trend, the equation of empathy with sympathy, hinders the therapeutic dyad from truly understanding a client’s internal experience and implicitly conveys the message that anxiety-provoking material is less welcome in the consulting room. The second trend, prizing cognition over affect, results in a primary focus on secondary thought process, discounting the affective experience that unconsciously steers behavior and thought. This trend is, in large part, due to the widespread dissemination of cognitive-behavioral therapy efficacy research and the belief by some individuals that psychodynamic forms of treatment lack empirical support. The last and most problematic trend, the rigid utilization of treatment manuals, tends to result in a reductionistic approach to treatment, limiting psychotherapy to a set of techniques while also overlooking salient aspects of treatment that can predict positive outcomes. Treatment manuals oversimplify the process of therapy; as a result, the therapeutic dyad is less likely to uncover and discover the multiple origins of one’s suffering, contributory factors that are not always readily available to conscious awareness. This paper discusses each trend and the therapeutic implications that result.

Keywords

Technique Empathy Nonverbal communication Psychodynamic Treatment manual Affect 

References

  1. Addis, M. E., & Krasnow, A. D. (2000). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ attitudes toward psychotherapy treatment manuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 331–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate, J. S. (2004). Full circle: Returning psychoanalytic theory to social work education. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 11, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arizmendi, T. G. (2008). Nonverbal communication in the context of dissociative processes. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aron, L. (1991). The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barasch, A. S. (1999). Psychotherapy as a short story: Selection and focus in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 27, 47–59.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow, D. H. (Ed.). (2008). Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by- step treatment manual (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Basch, M. F. (1991). The significance of a theory of affect for psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 291–304.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, K. D., & Stirman, S. W. (2011). The science of training in evidence-based treatments in the context of implementation programs: Current status and prospects for the future. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 38, 217–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Organizing principles of interaction from infant research and the lifespan prediction of attachment: Application to adult treatment. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (2003). The relational turn in psychoanalysis: A dyadic systems view from infant research. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 379–409.Google Scholar
  11. Black, D. M. (2004). Sympathy reconfigured: Some reflections on sympathy, empathy and the discovery of values. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 579–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Borntrager, C. F., Chorpita, B. F., Higa-McMillan, C., & Weisz, J. R. (2009). Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Are the concerns with the evidence or with the manuals? Psychiatric Services, 60, 677–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandell, J. R. (2002). The marginalization of psychoanalysis in academic social work. Psychoanalytic Social Work, 9, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bromberg, P. M. (2003). One need not be a house to be haunted: On enactment, dissociation, and the dread of “not-me”—a case study. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bromberg, P. M. (2008). Shrinking the tsunami: Affect regulation, dissociation, and the shadow of the flood. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 44, 329–350.Google Scholar
  17. Chused, J. F. (2007). Nonverbal communication in psychoanalysis: Commentary on Harrison and Tronick. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 875–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coltart, N. E. C. (1986). ‘Slouching towards Bethlehem…’ or thinking the unthinkable in psychoanalysis. In G. Kohon (Ed.), The British school of psychoanalysis: The independent tradition (pp. 185–199). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, A. M. (2005). The representational world and affect. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 25, 196–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crits-Christoph, P. (1992). The efficacy of brief dynamic psychotherapy: A meta- analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 151–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, B. L. (2012). The partners for change outcome management system (PCOMS): The heart and soul of change project. Canadian Psychology, 53, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farmer, R. L., Walsh, J., & Bentley, K. J. (2006). Advancing social work curriculum in psychopharmacology and medication management. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fonagy, P. (2002). The internal working model or the interpersonal interpretive function. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms, and anxiety. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XX (19251926): An autobiographical study (pp. 75–176).Google Scholar
  25. Gedo, J. E. (1995). The pragmatics of empathy. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 23, 1–12.Google Scholar
  26. Gibbons, M. B. C., Thompson, S. M., Scott, K., Schauble, L. A., Mooney, T., Thompson, D., et al. (2012). Supportive-expressive dynamic psychotherapy in the community mental health system: A pilot effectiveness trial for the treatment of depression. Psychotherapy, 49, 303–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenson, R. R. (1960). Empathy and its vicissitudes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 418–424.Google Scholar
  28. Grotstein, J. S. (1994). Projective identification and countertransference: A brief commentary on their relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 30, 578–592.Google Scholar
  29. Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561–573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Evidence-based treatment research: Advances, limitations, and next steps. American Psychologist, 66, 685–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohut, H. (1959). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis—An examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 459–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semi-circle of mental health. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, 395–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Krystal, H. (1975). Affect tolerance. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 179–219.Google Scholar
  35. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 576–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McHugh, R. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). The dissemination of implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 65, 73–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McWilliams, N. (1999). Psychoanalytic case formulation. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, M. L. (2008). The emotionally engaged analyst I: Theories of affect and their influence on therapeutic action. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, S. J., & Binder, J. L. (2002). The effects of manual-based training on treatment fidelity and outcome: A review of the literature on adult individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory Research, Practice, Training, 39, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the national association of social workers. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.Google Scholar
  41. Ogden, T. H. (1979). On projective identification. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60, 357–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pigman, G. W. (1995). Freud and the history of empathy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 237–256.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Safran, J. D. (2002). Brief relational psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sandler, J. (1987). The concept of projective identification. Bulletin of the Anna Freud Centre, 10, 33–49.Google Scholar
  45. Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Schore, A. N. (2012). The science of the art of psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  47. Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65, 98–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Stern, D. B. (2002). Language and the nonverbal as a unity: Discussion of “where is the action in the ‘talking cure’?”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 38, 515–525.Google Scholar
  50. Stern, D. B. (2010). Partners in thought: Working with unformulated experience, dissociation, and enactment. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  51. Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Strupp, H. H. (1993). The vanderbilt psychotherapy studies: Synopsis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 431–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turk, C. L., Heimberg, R. G., & Magee, L. (2008). Social anxiety disorder. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (4th ed., pp. 123–163). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wachtel, P. L. (2010). Beyond “ESTs”: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wallin, D. J. (2007). Attachment in psychotherapy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  56. Weissman, M. M., Verdeli, H., Gameroff, M. J., Bledsoe, S. E., Betts, K., Mufson, L., et al. (2006). National survey of psychotherapy training in psychiatry, psychology, and social work. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 925–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute for Clinical Social WorkChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations