Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 260–268 | Cite as

The Therapist as Psychobiological Regulator: Dissociation, Affect Attunement and Clinical Process

Original Paper

Abstract

Dissociation is defined as a protective coping mechanism employed on a broad spectrum: from day-to-day “spacing out” to psychic numbing to multiplicity. A convergence of recent insights in traumatology, neuroscience, and developmental theory is reviewed. These findings all point to the importance of affect regulation in infant and child development and in the therapeutic relationship, where attunement to implicit communication is crucial. Using such relational and intersubjective organizing principles as the concept of enactment and Beebe and Lachmann’s (Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions 2002) “three principles of salience,” I discuss an analytic case in which dissociation is a central dynamic.

Keywords

Dissociation Trauma Affect regulation Hyperarousal Enactment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Hillary Butler, Edith Gould, Amy Joelson, Linda Laughlin, Kristin Moore and Dorienne Sorter for your helpful comments. A shorter version of this paper was presented at the 2009 AAPCSW conference: Memory, Myth and Meaning in a Time of Turmoil.

References

  1. Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. M. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co-constructing interactions. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Mahwah: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, R. (Interviewer), & Schore, A. (Interviewee). (2001). An interview with Allan Schore—’The American Bowlby’ [Interview transcript]. Retrieved from thinking through the body web site: http://www.thinkbody.co.uk/papers/interview-with-allan-s.htm.
  7. Davies, J. M. (1996). Dissociation, repression and reality testing in the countertransference: The controversy over memory and false memory in the psychoanalytic treatment of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6(2), 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, J. M. (1998). Multiple perspectives on multiplicity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8(2), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, J. M. (1999). Getting cold feet, defining “safe-enough” borders: Dissociation, multiplicity, and integration in the analyst’s experience. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 68(2), 184–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, J. M. (2004). Whose bad object are we anyway? Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14(6), 711–732. doi: 10.1080/10481881409348802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, J. M., & Frawley, M. G. (1994). Treating the adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse: A psychoanalytic perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Howell, E. (2005). The dissociative mind. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Levine, P. A., & Frederick, A. (1997). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma: The innate capacity to transform overwhelming experiences. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19(4), 576–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ogden, T. H. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale: Aronson.Google Scholar
  16. Ogden, P., Minton, K., & Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the body: A sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Perry, B. D., Pollard, R. A., Blakely, T. L., Baker, W. L., & Vigilante, D. (1995). Childhood trauma, the neurobiology of adaptation, and “use dependent” development in the brain: How “states” become “traits”. Infant Mental Health Journal, 16(4), 271–291. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(199524)16:4<271::AID-IMHJ2280160404>3.0.CO;2-B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Putnam, F. W. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Scaer, R. C. (2001). The body bears the burden: Trauma, dissociation, and disease. New York: Haworth Medical Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schafer, R. (1983). The analytic attitude. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Schore, A. (2001). The effect of early relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 201–269. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<201::AID-IMHJ8>3.0.CO;2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schore, A. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Siegel, D. (1999). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stern, D. B. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stern, D. N., Sander, L., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79, 903–921.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tronick, E. Z., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., et al. (1998). Dyadically expanded states of consciousness and the process of therapeutic change. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19(3), 290–299. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199823)19:3<290::AID-IMHJ4>3.0.CO;2-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van der Kolk, B. A., McFarlane, A. C., & Weisaeth, L. (Eds.). (1996). Traumatic stress: The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wampold, B. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbarum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychoanalytic Institute, Postgraduate Center for Mental HealthNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Study CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations