Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 9–20 | Cite as

Modern Attachment Theory: The Central Role of Affect Regulation in Development and Treatment

  • Judith R. Schore
  • Allan N. Schore
Original Paper

Abstract

Over the past decade attachment theory has undergone an intense expansion of both its original scientific foundations as well as its applications to clinical work. Bowlby’s original description occurred during a period of behaviorism and an emphasis on the strange situation and secure base behaviors, which then gave way to a dominance of cognition and an emphasis on attachment narratives and reflective capacities. We will argue that in line with Bowlby’s fundamental goal of the integration of psychological and biological models of human development, the current interest in affective bodily-based processes, interactive regulation, early experience-dependent brain maturation, stress, and nonconscious relational transactions has shifted attachment theory to a regulation theory. This emphasis on the right brain systems that underlie attachment and developmental change has in turn forged deeper connections with clinical models of psychotherapeutic change, all of which are consonant with psychoanalytic understandings. Modern attachment theory can thus be incorporated into the core of social work theory, research, and practice.

Keywords

Interactive regulation Affect regulation Neurobiology Attachment theory Relational dynamics 

References

  1. Adler, H. M. (2002). The sociophysiology of caring in the doctor–patient relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant–mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allman, J. M., Watson, K. K., Tetreault, N. A., & Hakeem, A. Y. (2005). Intuition and autism: A possible role for Von Economo neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 367–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade, V. M. (2005). Affect and the therapeutic action in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 677–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anthi, P. R. (1983). Reconstruction of preverbal experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 31, 33–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Applegate, J. S., & Shapiro, J. R. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bogolepova, I. N., & Malofeeva, L. I. (2001). Characteristics of the development of speech motor areas 44 and 45 in the left and right hemispheres of the human brain in early post-natal ontogenesis. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 31, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bornstein, R. F. (1999), Source amnesia, misattribution, and the power of unconscious perceptions and memories. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 16, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourne, V. J., & Todd, B. K. (2004). When left means right: An explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations. Developmental Science, 7, 19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Bromberg, P. M. (1991). On knowing one’s patient inside out: The aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bucci, W. (1993). The development of emotional meaning in free association: A multiple code theory. In A. Wilson & J. E. Gedo (Eds.), Hierarchical concepts in psychoanalysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bucci, W. (2002). The referential process, consciousness, and the sense of self. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 5, 766–793.Google Scholar
  17. Buchheim, A., Erk, S., George, C., Kachele, H., Ruchsow, M., Spitzer, M., Kircher, T., & Walter, H. (2006). Measuring attachment representation in an fMRI environment: A pilot study. Psychopathology, 39, 144–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bugental, J. F. (1987). The art of the psychotherapist. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Chiron, C., Jambaque, I., Nabbout, R., Lounes, R., Syrota, A., & Dulac, O. (1997). The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain, 120, 1057–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, M. X., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Avoidant attachment and hemispheric lateralization of the processing of attachment- and emotion-related words. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 799–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
  22. Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 577–596.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedentahl & S. Kiyayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Devinsky, O. (2000). Right cerebral hemispheric dominance for a sense of corporeal and emotional self. Epilepsy & Behavior, 1, 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dorpat, T. L. (2001). Primary process communication. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 3, 448–463.Google Scholar
  26. Feinberg, T. E., & Keenan, J. P. (2005). Where in the brain is the self? Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 661–678.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fonagy, P, & Target M. (2002). Early intervention, the development of self-regulation. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 307–335.Google Scholar
  29. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2005). Bridging the transmission gap: An end to an important mystery of attachment research? Attachment & Human Development, 7, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Freud, S. (1895). Project for a scientific psychology. Standard Edition, 1, 295–397. London: Hogarth Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  31. Giovacchini, P. I. (1981). Object relations, deficiency states, and the acquisition of psychic structure. In S. Tutman, C. Kaye, & M. Zimmerman (Eds.), Object and self: A developmental approach (pp. 397–427). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grabner, R. H., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Brain correlates of self-related originality of ideas: Evidence from event-related power and phase-locking changes in the EEG. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 224–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greenson, R. (1978). Explorations in psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  34. Henry, J. P. (1993). Psychological and physiological responses to stress: The right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 28, 369–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobs, T. J. (1994). Nonverbal communications: Some reflections on their role in the psychoanalytic process and psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42, 741–762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jung-Beeman, M. et al. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2, 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2003). Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1108–1112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1999). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 19, 576–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyons-Ruth, K. (2000). “I sense that you sense that I sense...”: Sander’s recognition process and the specificity of relational moves in the psychotherapeutic setting. Infant Mental Health Journal, 21, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Mandal, M. K., & Ambady, N. (2004). Laterality of facial expressions of emotion: Universal and culture-specific influences. Behavioral Neurology, 15, 23–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcus, D. M. (1997). On knowing what one knows. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 66, 219–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mathew, M. (1998). The body as instrument. Journal of the British Association of Psychotherapists, 35, 17–36.Google Scholar
  45. Meares, R. (2005), The metaphor of play. Origin and breakdown of personal being, 3rd ed. London: Routledge. .Google Scholar
  46. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Pereg, D. (2003). Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics, development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 77–102. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, B. L., Seeley, W. W., Mychack, P., Rosen, H. J., Mena, I., & Boone, K. (2001). Neuroanatomy of the self. Evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 57, 817–821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitchell, R. L. C., Elliott, R., Barry, M., Crittenden, A., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (2003). The neural response to emotional prosody, as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1410–1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Molnar-Szakacs, I., Uddin, L. Q., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Right-hemisphere motor facilitation by self-descriptive personality-trait words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2000–2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ohnishi, T., et al. (2004). The neural network for the mirror system and mentalizing in normally developed children: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 15, 1483–1487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1986), Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Ovtscharoff, W. Jr., & Braun, K. (2001). Maternal separation and social isolation modulate the postnatal development of synaptic composition in the infralimbic cortex of octodon degus. Neuroscience, 104, 33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pipp, S., & Harmon, R. J. (1987). Attachment as regulation: A commentary. Child Development, 58, 648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prodan, C. I., Orbelo, D. M., Testa, J. A., & Ross, E. D. (2001). Hemispheric differences in recognizing upper and lower facial displays of emotion. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology, 14, 206–212.Google Scholar
  55. Sander, L. (1992). Letter to the editor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 582–584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Scaer, R. (2005). The trauma spectrum: Hidden wounds and human resiliency. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  57. Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Patterns of nonverbal behavior and sensitivity in the context of attachment relationships. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Schore, A. N. (1996). The experience-dependent maturation of a regulatory system in the orbital refrontal cortex and the origin of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 59–87.Google Scholar
  60. Schore, A. N. (1997). A century after Freud’s Project: Is a rapprochement between psychoanalysis and neurobiology at hand? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45, 841–867.Google Scholar
  61. Schore, A. N. (2000). Attachment and the regulation of the right brain. Attachment & Human Development, 2, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schore, A. N. (2001a). The effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 7–66.Google Scholar
  63. Schore, A. N. (2001b). The Seventh Annual John Bowlby Memorial Lecture, Minds in the making: Attachment, the self-organizing brain, and developmentally-oriented psychoanalytic psychotherapy. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 17, 299–328.Google Scholar
  64. Schore, A. N. (2002). Advances in neuropsychoanalysis, attachment theory, and trauma research: Implications for self psychology. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 433–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schore, A. N. (2003a). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  66. Schore, A. N. (2003b). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  67. Schore, A. N. (2005). Attachment, affect regulation, and the developing right brain: Linking developmental neuroscience to pediatrics. Pediatrics In Review, 26, 204–211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: The role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 324–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shaw, R. (2004). The embodied psychotherapist: An exploration of the therapists’ somatic phenomena within the therapeutic encounter. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shuren, J. E., & Grafman, J. (2002). The neurology of reasoning. Archives of Neurology, 59, 916–919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simpson, G., Williams, J., & Segall, A. (2007). Social work education and clinical learning. Clinical Social Work Journal, 35, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stern, D. N., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Nahum, J. P., Sander, L., & Tronick, E. Z. (1998). The process of therapeutic change involving implicit knowledge: Some implications of developmental observations for adult psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sullivan, R. M., & Gratton, A. (2002). Prefrontal cortical regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in the rat and implications for psychopathology: Side matters. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 99–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trevarthen, C. (1990). Growth and education of the hemispheres. In C. Trevarthen (Ed.), Brain circuits and functions of the mind (pp. 334–363). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tucker, D. M. (1992). Developing emotions and cortical networks. In M. R. Gunnar & C. A. Nelson (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Vol. 24, Developmental behavioral neuroscience (pp. 75–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  76. Tutte, J. C. (2004). The concept of psychical trauma: A bridge in interdisciplinary space. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 897–921.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van Lancker, D., & Cummings, J. L. (1999). Expletives: Neurolingusitic and neurobehavioral perspectives on swearing. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 83–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watt, D. F. (2003). Psychotherapy in an age of neuroscience: Bridges to affective neuroscience. In J. Corrigall & H. Wilkinson (Eds.), Revolutionary connections. Psychotherapy and neuroscience (pp. 79–115). Karnac: London.Google Scholar
  79. Whitehead, C. C. (2006). Neo-psychoanalysis: A paradigm for the 21st century. Journal of the Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 34, 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Sanville InstituteBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.NorthridgeUSA
  3. 3.UCLA David Geffen School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations