Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 235–243 | Cite as

Use of Self in Relational Clinical Social Work

  • Margaret Arnd-CaddiganEmail author
  • Richard Pozzuto
Original Article

Abstract

Since the inception of social work social workers have noted the importance of relationship in practice. More recently clinicians and other social workers have developed the term “use of self” to indicate important aspects of the professional relationship. How that term is defined rests on how one conceptualizes “self.” The authors suggest that from a relational perspective the concept of self changes from the notion of self as separate and constant to self as process in interaction. They demonstrate on a theoretical level as well as through a case example how defining self as process in interaction might affect clinical social work practice.

Keywords

Self Use of self Manualized practice Relational theory Practice theory 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H. (1963). Outsider: Studies in the sociology of deviance. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  3. Bein, E., Anderson, T., Strupp, H. H., Henry, W. P., Schacht, T. E., Binder, J. L., & Butler, S. F. (2000). The effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: Changes in therapeutic outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2. separation: Anxiety and anger. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  6. Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships. Chapter 5. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cooley, C. H. (1964). Looking glass self. New York, NY: Schocken.Google Scholar
  10. Cooley, C. H. (1992). Human nature and the social order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, M. (1994). The essential social worker: A guide to positive practice. Gower: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  12. Dewane, C. J. (2007). Use of self: A primer revisited. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34(4), 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. DeYoung, P. A. (2003). Relational psyhchotherapy: A primer. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, J., & Bess, J. (1998). Developing effectiveness in the therapeutic use of self. Clinical Social Work Journal 26(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Henry, W. P. (1998). Science, politics, and the politics of science: The use and misuse of empirically validated treatment research. Psychotherapy research, 8(2), 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kantrowitz, J. L. (1996). The patient’s impact on the analyst. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lax, W. D. (1996). Narrative, social constructionism, and Buddhism. In H. Rosen & K. T. Kuehlwein (Eds.), Constructing realities: Meaning-making perspectives for psychotherapists (pp. 195–222). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Levine, S. S. (2007). Nothing but the truth: Self-disclosure, self-revelation, and the persona of the analyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55(1), 81–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, B. L., Steeley, W. W., Mychack, P., Rosen, H. J., Mena, I., & Boone, K. (2001). Neuroanatomy of the self: Evidence from patients with frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 57, 817–821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, S. A. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell, S. A. (1997). Influence and autonomy in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, S., & Aron, L. (1999). Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Murphy, G., & Medin, D. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics; interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J. (1960). The child’s conception of physical causality. Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.Google Scholar
  36. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Implications and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  37. Saari, C. (1991). The creation of meaning in clinical social work. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect regulation and the repair of the self. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  40. Shore, A. N. (2005). A neuropsychoanalytic viewpoint: Commentary on paper by Stephen H. Knoblauch. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(6), 829–854.Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Strupp, H. H. (1998). The vanderbilt I study revisited. Psychotherapy Research, 8(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strupp, H. H., & Anderson, T. (1997). On the limitations of therapy manuals. Clincal Psychology, Science and Pracitce, 4(1), 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  45. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations