Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 5–21 | Cite as

Staying straight: lessons from ex-offenders

  • Thomas K. Kenemore
  • Ida Roldan
Article

ABSTRACT

This paper reports findings of a qualitative study of the experiences of ex-offenders. Incarceration and release from prison create a particularly challenging set of experiences for individuals and families seeking help with social, emotional, and psychological problems, and present significant barriers to understanding for the practitioner. The broad question posed was: What is the experience of ex-offenders? We presumed that the provision of effective treatment services for ex-offenders would require that they first be empathically understood in depth and in all their complexity. Intensive study of twelve subjects produced findings illustrating their unique experience of external and internal challenges. Practice implications are discussed with the aim of helping clinicians understand and serve this underserved and vulnerable population more effectively.

Keywords

ex-offender qualitative research recidivism clinical practice social service re-entry prison reform 

REFERENCES

  1. Abramsky S., (1999). When they get out The Atlantic Monthly 30–36Google Scholar
  2. Berzoff J., Flanagan L. M., Hertz P., (1996). Inside out and outside in: Psychodynamic clinical theory and practice in contemporary multicultural contexts Jason Aronson Northvale, NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2003. Retrieved June 28, 2004 from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/
  4. Champion, D. J. (2002). Prison. Retrieved August 19, 2002 from http://encarta.msn.com/find/print/encyclopedia
  5. Creswell J., (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approachesSage Publication LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzin N., (1978) Sociological methods McGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisner E., (1975). The perceptive eye: Toward the reformulation of educational evaluation. Occasional papers of the Stanford evaluation consortium Stanford University (mimeo) Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Germain C., Gitterman A., (1996). The life model of social work practice: Advances in theory and practice Columbia University Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser B., (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory The Sociology Press Mill Valley, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser B., Strauss A., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research Aldine Publishing Company ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Irwin J., (1970). The felon University of California Press BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Joy J. M. (2002). When prison doors open. State Government News, 13–15Google Scholar
  13. Kupers M. D., (1999). Prison madness Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. La Vigne, N., Mamalian, C., Visher, C., & Travis, J. (2003). A portrait of prisoner reentry in Illinois. Retrieved October 10, 2003 from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410662_ILPotrait Reentry.pdf
  15. Lincoln Y., Guba E., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry Sage Publications Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2003). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Retrieved October 10, 2003 from http://www.urban.org/pdfs/410213_reentry.pdf
  17. Maruna S., (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives American Psychological Association Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Maur M., Chesney-Lind M., (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment The New Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Muhr T., (1997). Atlas.ti: The knowledge workbench Scientific Software Development BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. McGuire J., (2002). Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending John Wiley & Sons, Ltd EnglandGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Brien P., (2001). Making it in the free world State University of New York Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Padgett D. K., (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research Sage Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  23. Perez-Foster, R. (1998). The clinician’s cultural countertransference: The psychodynamics of culturally competent practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 26(2), 264Google Scholar
  24. Petersilia, J. (2000). When prisoners return to communities: Political, economic, and social consequences. Federal Probation 654:3–9Google Scholar
  25. Petersilia J., (2002). When prisoners return to the community: political, economic, and social consequences University of California, Irvine School of Social Ecology, prepared for Sentencing and Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century 9, 1–8Google Scholar
  26. Rosenthal Gelman, C. (2004). Toward a better understanding of the use of psychodynamically informed treatment with latinos: Findings from clinical experience. Clinical Social Work Journal, 1(32), 68Google Scholar
  27. Saari C., (1991). The creation of meaning in clinical social work The Guilford Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Saari C., (1986). Clinical social work treatment: How does it work? Gardner Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Schrivner, J. M., (2001). Human behavior and the social environment. Boston: Allyn and BaconGoogle Scholar
  30. Specht H., Courteny, M.,(1994) Unfaithful angels: How social work has abandoned its mission The Free Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Staples, B. (2002). Prison class: What ma Barker knew and Congress didn’t. New York Times, p. 20Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniquesGoogle Scholar
  33. Travis, J, Solomon A., Waul M., (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban InstituteGoogle Scholar
  34. Turner F., (Ed) (1996). Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches The Free Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. White M., Epston D., (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends Norton New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Clinical Social WorkChicagoUSA
  2. 2.WilmetteUSA

Personalised recommendations