Optimal Influence Strategies in Social Networks
- 366 Downloads
This paper suggests a modeling framework to investigate the optimal strategy followed by a monopolistic firm aiming to manipulate the process of opinion formation in a social network. The monopolist and a set of consumers communicate to form their beliefs about the underlying product quality. Since the firm’s associated optimization problem can be analytically solved only under specific assumptions, we rely on the sequential quadratic programming computational approach to characterize the equilibrium. When consumers’ initial beliefs are uniform, the firm’s optimal influence strategy always involves targeting the most influential consumer. For the case of non-uniform initial beliefs, the monopolist might target the less influential consumer if the latter’s initial opinion is low enough. The probability of investing more in the consumer with the lower influence increases with the distance between consumers’ initial beliefs and with the degree of trust attributed on consumers by the firm. The firm’s profit is minimized when consumers’ influences become equal, implying that the firm benefits from the presence of consumers with divergent strategic locations in the network. In the absence of a binding constraint on total investment, the monopolist’s incentives to manipulate the network decrease with consumers’ initial beliefs and might either increase or decrease with the trust put in consumers’ opinion by the firm. Finally, the firm’s strategic motivation to communicate persistently high beliefs during the opinion formation process is positively associated with the market size, with the available budget and with the direct influence of the most influential consumer on the other but negatively associated with consumers’ initial valuation of the good.
KeywordsInfluence strategy Monopoly Opinion formation Social networks
This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Aristeia, SocioMine.
- Biggs, M. (1973). Constrained minimisation using recursive quadratic programming: Some alternative subproblem formulations. Hatfield Polytechnic. Numerical Optimisation Centre.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. (2000). Foundations of social theory (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN: 0674312260.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. ISSN: 00029602. doi: 10.2307/2780243.
- Fletcher, R. (2013). Practical methods of optimization. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (1981). Practical optimization. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Gladwell, M. (2006). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Golub, B., & Jacksonm, M. O. (2010). Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 112–149.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M. O., et al. (2008). Social and economic networks (Vol. 3). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence, the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Powell, M. J. D. (1978a). The convergence of variable metric methods for non-linearly constrained optimization calculations. In O. L. Mangasarian, R. R. Meyer & S. M. Robinson (Eds.), Nonlinear programming (vol. 3, pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Powell, M. J. D. (1978b). A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations. In G. A. Waston (Ed.), Numerical analysis (pp. 144–157). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Powell, M. J. D. (1983). Variable metric methods for constrained optimization. In A. Bachem, M. Grotschel & B. Korte (Eds.), Mathematical programming the state of the art (pp. 288–311). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Richardson, M., Domingos, P. (2002). Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 61–70). New York: ACM.Google Scholar