Advertisement

Computational Economics

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 1263–1285 | Cite as

Analysis of China’s Regional Eco-efficiency: A DEA Two-stage Network Approach with Equitable Efficiency Decomposition

  • Junfei Chu
  • Jie WuEmail author
  • Qingyuan Zhu
  • Qingxian An
  • Beibei Xiong
Article

Abstract

Increased concern over environmental pollution issues in China has caused eco-efficiency analysis to become a hot research topic. This study focuses on the eco-efficiency analysis of Chinese provincial-level regions, regarding each region as a two-stage network structure. The first stage is characterized as the production system and the second stage as the pollution control system. Regarding the pollution emissions as intermediate products, a two-stage data envelopment analysis model is proposed to obtain the eco-efficiency of the whole two-stage system. To measure efficiencies for the two sub-stages in each system, an equitable efficiency decomposition model and an algorithm are provided. Next, an empirical study of regional eco-efficiency analysis of 30 Chinese regions reveals that in 2013 the majority of these regions in China had poor ecological performance. Further, four categories of regions are identified by analyzing the efficiencies of each region’s two sub-stages and some suggestions are provided to improve the eco-efficiencies of regions in each category. Additionally, analysis of regional disparities in eco-efficiency shows that in China the average eco-efficiency of the eastern area is higher than those of the central and western areas.

Keywords

Eco-efficiency analysis Data envelopment analysis  Two-stage network Equitable efficiency decomposition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by National Natural Science Funds of China (No. 71222106, 71110107024, and 71501189), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No.20133402110028), Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P. R. China (No. 201279), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. WK2040160008), and Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China.

References

  1. Amirteimoori, A. (2013). A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21(1), 141–151.Google Scholar
  2. Avadí, Á., Vázquez-Rowe, I., & Fréon, P. (2014). Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+ DEA framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 118–131.Google Scholar
  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.Google Scholar
  4. Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.Google Scholar
  5. Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1909–1917.Google Scholar
  6. Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research logistics quarterly, 9(3-4), 181–186.Google Scholar
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(4), 429–444.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy policy, 58, 277–283.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170–1176.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., Du, J., David Sherman, H., & Zhu, J. (2010). DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 339–349.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zha, Y., & Zhu, J. (2009). A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 276–281.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous DMUs. Operations Research, 61(3), 666–676.Google Scholar
  13. Ding, C., & Li, J. (2014). Analysis over factors of innovation in China’s fast economic growth since its beginning of reform and opening up. AI & Society, 29(3), 377–386.Google Scholar
  14. Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1988). Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(6), 563–576.Google Scholar
  15. Dyckhoff, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 312–325.Google Scholar
  16. Emrouznejad, A., Banker, R., Lopes, A. L. M., & de Almeida, M. R. (2014). Data envelopment analysis in the public sector. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 48(1), 2–3.Google Scholar
  17. Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Agrell, P. J., Lotfi, F. H., & Beigi, Z. G. (2015). A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 79, 195–203.Google Scholar
  18. Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEAmodels. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2011). Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: A non-radial DEA approach. Science of the Total Environment, 409(14), 2693–2699.Google Scholar
  20. Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.Google Scholar
  21. Hua, Z., Bian, Y., & Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach. Omega, 35(5), 578–587.Google Scholar
  22. Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.Google Scholar
  23. Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 437–446.Google Scholar
  24. Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega, 40(5), 611–618.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Y., Lei, X., Dai, Q., & Liang, L. (2015). Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(3), 964–973.Google Scholar
  26. Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(7), 643–653.Google Scholar
  27. Lozano, S. (2015). Technical and environmental efficiency of a two-stage production and abatement system. Annals of Operations Research, 27(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  28. Lorenzo-Toja, Y., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Chenel, S., Marín-Navarro, D., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2015). Eco-efficiency analysis of Spanish WWTPs using the LCA+ DEA method. Water Research, 68, 651–666.Google Scholar
  29. Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Reig-Martínez, E. (2011). Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4), 1154–1164.Google Scholar
  30. Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Beltrán-Esteve, M., & Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2012). Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(3), 798–809.Google Scholar
  31. Shi, G. M., Bi, J., & Wang, J. N. (2010). Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6172–6179.Google Scholar
  32. Schaltegger, S. (1996). Corporate environmental accounting. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, K., Yu, S., & Zhang, W. (2013a). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1117–1127.Google Scholar
  35. Wang, K., Wei, Y. M., & Zhang, X. (2013b). Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: A multi-directional efficiency analysis. Applied Energy, 104, 105–116.Google Scholar
  36. Wang, K., Lu, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2013c). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A range-adjusted measure based analysis. Applied Energy, 112, 1403–1415.Google Scholar
  37. Wu, A. H., Cao, Y. Y., & Liu, B. (2014). Energy efficiency evaluation for regions in China: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Efficiency, 7(3), 429–439.Google Scholar
  38. Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 571–579.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, J., Lv, L., Sun, J., & Ji, X. (2015a). A comprehensive analysis of China’s regional energy saving and emission reduction efficiency: From production and treatment perspectives. Energy Policy, 84, 166–176.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., & Liang, L. (2015b). Two-stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: A DEA based approach. Computational Economics, 46(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  41. Wu, J., Chu, J. F., & Liang, L. (2015c). Target setting and allocation of carbon emissions abatement based on DEA and closest target: An application to 20 APEC economies. Natural Hazards, 42(3), 1–18.Google Scholar
  42. Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2015d). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 160(1), 144–156.Google Scholar
  43. Wu, J., Xiong, B., An, Q., Sun, J., & Wu, H. (2015e). Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs. Annals of Operations Research, 2(6), 429–444.Google Scholar
  44. Xie, B. C., Shang, L. F., Yang, S. B., & Yi, B. W. (2014). Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: Evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Energy, 74, 147–157.Google Scholar
  45. Yang, M., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, L. (2014). An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 479–489.Google Scholar
  46. Yang, L., Ouyang, H., Fang, K., Ye, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators, 51, 13–19.Google Scholar
  47. Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., & Hu, Z. (2007). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: Cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics, 29(6), 1179–1191.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., Yuan, J. H., & Gao, X. J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39(2), 644–650.Google Scholar
  49. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, 30(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junfei Chu
    • 1
  • Jie Wu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qingyuan Zhu
    • 1
  • Qingxian An
    • 2
  • Beibei Xiong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations