Computational Economics

, 38:425 | Cite as

Can Endogenous Participation Explain Price Volatility? Evidence from an Agent-Based Cobweb Model

Article

Abstract

This work provides a computational cobweb model with heterogeneous adaptive producers with endogenous market entry and exit. Firms face a borrowing constraint and so can go bankrupt. At the same time when average profits are positive there is an inflow of new firms in the market. Bounded dynamics and endogenous volatility are shown to follow without resorting to nonlinearities.

Keywords

Heterogeneous agents Expectations Price instability Market entry and exit 

References

  1. Branch W. (2002) Local convergence properties of a cobweb model with rationally heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27: 63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brock W., Hommes C. (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65: 1059–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busenitz L. W., Barney J. B. (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing 12(1): 9–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson J. A. (1968) An invariably stable cobweb model. Review of Economic Studies 35(3): 360–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colucci D., Valori V. (2006) Ways of learning in a simple economic setting: A comparative approach. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 29: 653–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colucci D., Valori V. (2011) Adaptive expectations and cobweb phenomena: Does heterogeneity matter?. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35(8): 1307–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commendatore P., Currie M. (2008) The cobweb, borrowing and financial crises. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 66: 625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawid H., Kopel M. (1998) On economic applications of the genetic algorithm: A model of the cobweb type. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 8: 297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ezekiel M. (1938) The cobweb theorem. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 52: 255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geroski P. A. (1995) What do we now about entry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13: 421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goeree J. K., Hommes C. (2000) Heterogeneous beliefs and the non-linear cobweb model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24: 761–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gouel, C. (2010). Agricultural price instability: A survey of competing explanations and remedies. Journal of Economic Surveys. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00634.
  13. Hommes, C. H., Sonnemans, J., & van de Velden, H. (2000). Expectations formation in a cobweb economy: Some one person experiments. In D. Delli Gatti, M. Gallegati, & A. Kirman (Eds.), Interaction and market structure. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (Vol. 484, pp. 253–266). Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Huang W. (1995) Caution implies profit. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27: 257–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiyotaki N., Moore J. (1997) Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105: 211–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore D. A., Oesch J. M., Zietsma C. (2007) What competition? Myopic self-focus in market-entry decisions. Organization Science 18(3): 440–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nerlove M. (1958) Adaptive expectations and cobweb phenomena. Quarterly Journal of Economics 72(2): 227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simonsohn U. (2010) eBay’s crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Science 56(7): 1060–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIMAD—Università di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations