Advertisement

Computational Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 157–171 | Cite as

Opinions and Networks: How Do They Effect Each Other

  • Zhengzheng Pan
Article

Abstract

The topic of this study is two-fold and two models are presented. For the first part, I propose a non-linear learning algorithm that takes into account both proximity of opinions and network effects. Agents reach consensus of a final opinion that can be estimated given initial conditions under star and small-world networks. However, when the network structure is scale-free, simulation results show rather chaotic patterns. In the second half of this paper, a two-stage endogenous network formation mechanism is introduced. Opinion closeness is critical in establishing links. Existing neighbors also play an important role in connecting to new neighbors, which, combined with a growing population, contributes to a power-law degree distribution with coefficients that fit empirical findings extremely well. The correlation between opinion and degree is illustrated and formalized as well.

Keywords

Social learning Consensus Complex network Network dynamics Simulation 

JEL Classification

D83 D85 C63 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert R., Jeong H., Barabási A.-L. (1999) Diameter of the world wide web. Nature 401: 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaral L., Díaz-Guilera A., Moreira A., Goldberger A., Lipsitz L. (2004) Emergence of complex dynamics in a simple model of signaling networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 15551–15555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bala V., Goyal S. (1998) Learning from neighbors. The Review of Economic Studies 65: 595–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A., Fudenberg D. (2004) Word-of-mouth learning. Games and Economic Behavior 46: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barabási A.-L. (2003) Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means. Plume, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Barabási A.-L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barabási A.-L., Jeong H., Neda Z., Ravasza E., Schubert A., Vicsek T. (2002) Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 311: 590–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and information cascades. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12: 151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borjas G. (1995) Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human-capital externalities. American Economic Review 85: 365–390Google Scholar
  10. Chwe M. S.-Y. (2000) Communication and coordination in social networks. Review of Economic Studies 67: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeGroot M. (1974) Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeMarzo P. M., Vayanos D., Zwiebel J. (2003) Persuasion bias, social infulence, and unidimensional opinions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 909–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duflo E., Saez E. (2002) Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: The influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics 85: 121–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellison G., Fudenberg D. (1993) Rules of thumb of social learning. The Journal of Political Economy 101: 612–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans W., Oates W., Schwab R. (1993) Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy 100: 966–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faloutsos M., Faloutsos P., Faloutsos C. (1999) On power-law relationships of the internet topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 29: 251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. French J. R. P. (1956) A formal theory of social power. Psychological Review 63: 181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedkin N. E., Johnsen E. C. (1997) Social positions in influence networks. Social Networks 19: 209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golub B., Jackson M.O. (2010) Naive learning in social networks: Convergence, influence, and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2(1): 112–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gottwald, G. A., & Melbourne, I. (2002). A new test for chaos. Arxiv preprint nlin/0208033.Google Scholar
  21. Granovetter M. S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griliches G. (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technical change. Econometrica 25: 501–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., & Swart, P. J. (2008). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In Proceedings of the 7th Python in science conference (SciPy2008) (pp. 11–15). Pasadena, CA USA.Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, M. O. (2006). The economics of social networks. In Proceedings of the 9th world congress of the econometric society.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson M. O., Rogers B. W. (2007) Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks?. American Economics Review 97: 890–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz L., Kling J., Liebman J. (2001) Moving to opportunity in Boston: Early impacts of a housing mobility program. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVI: 607–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauffman S. (1993) The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorenz J. (2005) A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 355: 217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madrian B., Shea D. (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVI: 1149–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pan, Z. (2009). Learning, game play, and convergence of behavior in evolving social networks. PhD dissertation, Virginia Tech, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  31. Pan, Z. (2010). Trust, influence, and convergence of behavior in social networks, Mathematical Social Sciences (in press).Google Scholar
  32. Pan, Z., & Gilles R. P. (2009). Naive learning and game play in a dual social network framework. Working paper.Google Scholar
  33. Sporns O. (2002) Network analysis, complexity, and brain function. Complexity 8: 56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. Jr. (2000). Python reference manual Lincoln: iUniverseGoogle Scholar
  35. Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Network Dynamics and Simulation Science LaboratoryVirginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations