Computational Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 381–391 | Cite as

Teaching Computational Economics to Graduate Students

Article
  • 163 Downloads

Abstract

The teaching of computational economics to graduate students has mostly been in a single course with a focus on algorithms and computer code. The shortcoming with this approach is that it neglects one of the most important aspects of computational economics—namely model development skills. These skills are the ability to conceptualize the science, engineering and economics of a problem and to convert that understanding first to a mathematical model and then to a computational representation in a software system. Thus we recommend that a two course sequence in computational economics be created for graduate students with the first course focusing on model development skills and the second course on algorithms and the speed and accuracy of computer codes. We believe that a model development course is most helpful to graduate students when it introduces the students to a wide variety of computational models created by past generations and ask them to first make small modification in order to better understand the models, the mathematics and the software. This in turn is followed by encouraging them to make more substantial modifications of the students’ own choosing so as to move the models in directions that permit the students to address current economic problems. We think that the key element of this process is it’s enhancement of the creative abilities of our students.

Keywords

Graduate teaching Computational economics 

JEL Codes

C63 E61 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adda J., Cooper R. (2003). Dynamics economics: Quantitative methods and applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, M., Dammert, A., Meeraus, A., & Stoutjesdijk, A. J. (1983). World investment analysis: The case of aluminum. World bank staff working papers, World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Choksi A.M., Meeraus A., Stoutjesdijk A.J. (1980). The planning of investment programs in the fertilizer industry. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Corbae D. (1993). Relaxing the cash-in-advance constraint at a fixed cost: Are simple trigger-target portfolio rules optimal?. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17: 51–64Google Scholar
  5. Date C.J. (1977). An introduction to database systems (2nd ed). Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon, P. B., Parmenter, B. R., Sutton, J., & Vincent, D. P. (1982). ORANI, a multisectoral model of the australian economy. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Dorfman R., Samuelson P., Solow R. (1958). Linear programming and economic analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Duraiappah A.K. (2003). Computational models in the economics of environment and development, advances in computational economics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein J.M., Axtell R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall R.E., Taylor J.B. (1997). Macroeconomics (5th ed). New York New York, W.W. Norton and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  11. Judd K.L. (1998). Numerical methods in economics. Cambridge, Massachussets, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Judd, K. L., & Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics, Vol. 2 of Handbook of computational economics. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland Publishers (Elsevier).Google Scholar
  13. Kendrick D.A., Meeraus A., Alatorre J. (1984). The planning of investment activities in the steel industry. Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendrick D.A., MercadoP.R., Amman H.M. (2006). Computational economics. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton Universit PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim S.R. (2004). Uncertainty, political preferences, and stabilization: Stochastic control using dynamic CGE models. Computational Economics 24: 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein L.R. (1947). The Keynesian revolution. London United Kingdom, Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Koopmans, T. C. (1947). Optimum utilization of the transportation system. In: Proceedings of the International Statistical Conferences, 1947, Washington, D.C. (vol. 5) (Vol. 5 reprinted as Supplemental to Econometrica, Vol. 17, 1949).Google Scholar
  18. Krusell P., Smith A.A. (1998). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy. Journal of Political Economy 106: 867–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, K. P. (2001). Computational econometrics: GAUSS programming for econometricians and financial analysts, ETEXT Publishing, available at http://www.etext.net.Google Scholar
  20. Markowitz H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKibbin W.J., Wilcoxen P.J. (2002). Climate change policy after Kyoto: Blueprint for a realistic approach. Washington, D.C, Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  22. Mennes L.B.M., Stoutjesdijk A.J. (1985). Multicountry investment analysis. Baltimore, Maryland, Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Mercado P.R., Kendrick D.A., Amman H.M. (1998). Teaching macroeconomics with GAMS. Computational Economics 12: 125–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miranda M.J., Fackler P.L. (2002). Applied computational economics and finance. Cambridge, Massachussets, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Nordhaus W.D. (1992). An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258: 1315–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramsey F.O. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sargent T.J. (1993). Bounded rationality in macroeconomics. Oxford United Kingdom, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson G.L., Thore S. (1992). Computational economics. South San Francisco, California, Scientific PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Tinbergen J. (1950). The dynamics of business cycles: A study in economic fluctuations. Chicago Illinois, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Varian H.R. (1996). Computational economics and finance: Modelling and analysis with mathematica. Santa Clara CA, Springer-Verlag PublishersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations