Computational Economics

, Volume 27, Issue 2–3, pp 229–259 | Cite as

Measuring the Degree of Convergence among European Business Cycles

Article
First Online:

Abstract

The dating of a possible European business cycle has been inconclusive. At this stage, there is no consensus on the existence of such a cycle, or of its periodicity and amplitude, or of the relationship of individual member countries to that cycle. Yet cyclical convergence is the key consideration for countries that wish to be members of the currency union. The confusion over whether and to what degree the UK is converging on the cycles of its European partners, or whether its cycle is more in line with the US, is one example of this lack of consensus. Moreover, countries will vary in the components and characteristics that make up their output cycles at any moment, as well as in the state of their cycle. In this paper we show how to decompose a business cycle into a time-frequency framework. This allows us to decompose movements in output, both at the European level and in member countries, into their component cycles and allows those component cycles (and the coherence between them) to vary in their importance and cyclical characteristics. That then allows us to determine if the inconclusive convergence results obtained so far have appeared because member countries have some cycles in common, but diverge at other frequencies.

Keywords

business cycle coherence growth rates time-frequency analysis 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A.-M. and Mojon, B. (2001). Some stylised facts on the Euro area business cycle. European Central Bank Working Paper, No 95.Google Scholar
  2. Altavilla, C. (2004). Do EMU members share the same business cycle? Journal of Common Market Studies, 42, 869–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artis, M., Marcellino, M. and Priorietti, T. (2004). Dating the euro area business cycle. In L. Reichlin (ed.). The Euro Area Business Cycle: Stylised Facts and Measurement Issues, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  4. Artis, M. and Zhang, W. (1997). International business cycles and the ERM: Is there a European business cycle? International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artis, M. and Zhang, W. (2002). Membership of EMU: Fuzzy clustering of alternative criteria. Journal of Economic Integration, 17, 54–79.Google Scholar
  6. Barro, R.J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barro, R.J. and Sala-I-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Barro, R.J. and Sala-I-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumol, W.J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072–1085.Google Scholar
  10. Baxter, M. and Kouparitsas, M. A. (2005). Determinants of business cycle comovement: A robust analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, 113–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchard, O. J. and Simon, J. (2001). The long and large decline in U.S. output volatility. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boashash, B. (2003). Time frequency signal analysis and processing, Elsevier, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Boashash, B. and Reilly, A. (1992). Algorithms for time-frequency signal analysis, 163–181. In B. Boashash (ed.). Time-Frequency Signal Analysis – Methods and Applications, Longman-Cheshire, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J.Y. and Mankiw, N.G. (1987). Permanent and transitory components in macroeconomic fluctuations. American Economic Review, 77, 111–117.Google Scholar
  15. Canova, F. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 475–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canova, F. and Dellas, H. (1993). Trade dependence and the international business cycle. Journal of International Economics, 34, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chauvet, M. and Potter, S. (2001). Recent changes in the US business cycle: mimeo, University of California.Google Scholar
  18. Claasen, T.A.C.M. and Mecklenbräuker, W. F. G. (1980a). The Wigner distribution – a tool for time frequency analysis – Part I: Continuous-time signals. Philips Journal of Research, 35, 217–250.Google Scholar
  19. Claasen, T.A.C.M. and Mecklenbrauker, W. F. G. (1980b). The Wigner distribution – a tool for time-frequency signal analysis - Part II: Discrete-time signals. Philips Journal of Research, 35, 276–300.Google Scholar
  20. Claasen, T.A.C.M. and Mecklenbräuker, W.F.G. (1980c). The Wigner distribution – a tool for time frequency signal analysis - Part III: Relations with other time-frequency signal transforms. Philips Journal of Research, 35, 372–389.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, P.K. (1987). The cyclical component of the U.S. economic activity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 797–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, L. (1989). Time-frequency distributions – review. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 941–981.Google Scholar
  23. Demertzis, M., Hughes Hallett, A. and Rummel, O. (1998). Is a 2-Speed system in Europe the answer to the conflict between the German and the Anglo-Saxon models of monetary control? In S. Black and M. Moersch (eds). Competition and Convergence in Financial Markets – the German and Anglo-Saxon Models, Elsevier North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Dowrick, S. and Nguyen, D.-T. (1989). OECD comparative economic growth 1950–1985. American Economic Review, 79, 1010–1030.Google Scholar
  25. Doyle, B. and Faust, J. (2003). Breaks in the variability and comovement of G7 economic growth. International Finance Discussion Paper, no 786, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, P. and Karras, G. (1996). Convergence revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 249–265.Google Scholar
  27. Forni, M. and Reichlin, L. (2001). Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the US. European Economic Review, 45, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frankel, J. and Rose, A. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimal currency area criteria. Economic Journal, 108, 1009–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gabor, D. (1946). Theory of communication. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineering, 93, 429–457.Google Scholar
  30. Gerdtham, U. G. and Löthgren, M. (2002). New panel results on cointegration of international health expenditure and GDP. Applied Economics, 34, 1679–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerlach, S. (1989). Information, persistence, and real business cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 13, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gröchenig, K. (2001). Foundations of Time-Frequency Analysis. Birkhäuser, Boston.Google Scholar
  33. Harding, D. and Pagan, A. (2001). Extracting, analysing and using cyclical information. mimeo, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  34. Hughes Hallett, A. and Piscitelli, L. (2002). Does trade integration cause convergence? Economics Letters, 75, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes Hallett, A. and Richter, C. (2002). Are capital markets efficient? Evidence from the term structure of interest rates in Europe. Economic and Social Review, 33, 333–356.Google Scholar
  36. Hughes Hallett, A. and Richter, C. (2003a). Learning and monetary policy in a spectral analysis representation. In P. Wang, and S.-H. Chen (eds), Computational Intelligence in Economics and Finance, Springer Verlag, Berlin pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
  37. Hughes Hallett, A. and Richter, C. (2003b). A spectral analysis of the short-end of the British term structure, In R. Neck (ed.), Modelling and Control of Economic Systems, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp. 123–128.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes Hallett, A. and Richter, C. (2004). Spectral analysis as a tool for financial policy: An analysis of the short end of the British term structure. Computational Economics, 23, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes Hallett, A. and Richter, C. (2006). Is the convergence of business cycles a global or regional issue? The UK, US, and Euroland. International Journal of Finance and Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  40. Inklaar, R. and de Haan, J. (2000). Is there really a European business cycle? CESifo Working Paper, No 268, Munich.Google Scholar
  41. Jenkins, G.M. and Watts, D.G. (1968). Spectral Analysis and its Applications. Holden-Day. San Francisco.Google Scholar
  42. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorensen, B.E. and Yosha, O. (2004). Asymmetric shocks and risk sharing in a monetary union: Updated Evidence and Policy Implications for Europe. CEPR Discussion paper, no. 4463, London.Google Scholar
  43. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorenson, B. and Yosha, O. (2001). Economic integration, industrial specialisation, and the asymmetry of macroeconomic fluctuations. Journal of International Economics, 55, 107–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kiani, K.M. and Bidarkota, P.V. (2003). On business cycle asymmetries in G7 countries, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  45. Kontolemis, Z. and Samiei, H. (2000). The UK business cycle, monetary policy and EMU entry. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 00/210, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. LaMotte, L.R. and McWorther, A.J. (1978). An exact test for the presence of random walk coefficients in a linear regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 816–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Laven, G. and Shi, G. (1993). Zur interpretation von Lagverteilungen. Discussion Paper, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz.Google Scholar
  48. Levy, D. and Dezhbakhsh, H. (2003). International evidence on output fluctuation and shock persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 1499–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lin, Z. (1997). An introduction to time-frequency signal analysis. Sensor Review, 17, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of development planning. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luginbuhl, R. and Koopman, S. J. (2003). Convergence in European GDP Series: A multivariate common converging trend-cycle decomposition. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2003–031/4.Google Scholar
  52. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matz, G. and F. Hlawatsch (2003). Time-varying power spectra of nonstationary random processes. In B. Boashash (ed.), Time Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  54. McAdam, P. (2003). US, Japan and the Euro Area: Comparing business-cycle features. European Central Bank Working Paper, No 283.Google Scholar
  55. Nerlove, M. Grether, D.M. and Carvalho, J. L. (1995). Analysis of Economic Time Series. Academic Press. New York.Google Scholar
  56. Papandreou-Suppapola, A. (2002). Applications in Time-Frequency Signal Processing. CRC Press. Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  57. Peersman, G. and Smets, F. (2005). Industry effects of monetary policy in the Euro area. Economic Journal, 115, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ploberger, W., Kramer, W. and Kontrus, K. (1989). A new test for structural stability in the linear regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 40, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prasad, E.S. (1999). International trade and the business cycle. The Economic Journal, 109, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Quah, D.T. (1993). Galton's fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rapach, D.E. (2002). Are real GDP levels nonstationary? Evidence from panel data tests. Southern Economic Journal, 68, 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Razzak, W.A. (1998). Business cycle asymmetries and the nominal exchange rate regimes. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper, G98/4.Google Scholar
  63. Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rubin, J. and Thygesen, N. (1996). Monetary union and the outsiders: A cointegration, codependence analysis of the business cycles in Europe. Economic Appliquee, 44, 123–171.Google Scholar
  65. Sala-I-Martin, X. (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40, 1325–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solow, R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stock, J.H. and Watson, M. W. (2003). Understanding changes in the international business cycles. NBER Working paper, No 9859.Google Scholar
  68. Stock, J.H. and Watson, M. W. (2005). Understanding changes in the international business cycles dynamics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3.Google Scholar
  69. Suardi, M. (2001). EMU and asymmetries in the monetary policy transmission. Economic Paper 157, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  70. Todd, J. (2003). Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP; Evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 313–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Treasury, H.M. (2003). UK membership of the single currency: An assessment of the five economic tests, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  72. U.S. Census Bureau (2002). X12-ARIMA-Reference Manual, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  73. Watson, M.W. (1986). Univariate detrending methods with stochastic trends. Journal of Monetary Economics, 18, 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wells, C. (1996). The Kalman Filter in Finance. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  75. Wolff, E.N. (1991). Capital formation and productivity convergence over the long term. American Economic Review, 81, 565–579.Google Scholar
  76. Wolters, J. (1980). Stochastic Dynamic Properties of Linear Econometric Models, Springer Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt University and CEPR, Department of EconomicsVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations