Critical Criminology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 275–291 | Cite as

Comparing Discourse to Officer Perceptions: The Problems of War and Militarization in Wildlife Crime Enforcement

  • Siv Rebekka Runhovde


‘War’ has become a common model and metaphor for biodiversity conservation in Africa. By discussing the specific challenges of wildlife crime enforcement in Uganda, this article challenges the ‘war on wildlife crime’ discourse. It concludes that in the context of Uganda, the discourse is profoundly unhelpful because of a lack of alignment between the problems highlighted by Ugandan law enforcement officers interviewed and the solutions typically favoured in the ‘wars on crime’. Most wildlife crimes are subsistence-driven and interviewees’ requests are for basic equipment and conventional capacity building. Findings demonstrate that the language of war, militarization and securitization should be used with caution as it risks constructing an image of wildlife crime that is misleading—and one that prevents responses that are effective in the long term.


Protected Area Organize Crime National Park Wildlife Crime Illegal Hunting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This paper has benefited greatly from feedback from H. I. Gundhus, R. Sollund, A. Brisman and J. Gosling. I am also grateful for the helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers. I wish to thank the Norwegian Embassy in Kampala for writing introduction letters to the relevant organizations and the Nordic Africa Institute for funding this research in the form of a scholarship. I would also thank the respondents for sharing their knowledge, without which the present study could not have been completed.


  1. Alemika, E. O. (2009). Police practice and police research in Africa. Police Practice and Research, 10(5–6), 483–502. doi: 10.1080/15614260903378467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AllAfrica. (2016). Uganda: Armed poachers threaten elephants. Retrieved from Accessed January 25, 2017.
  3. Baker, B. (2005). Multi-choice policing in Uganda. Policing and Society, 15(1), 19–41. doi: 10.1080/1043946042000338913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Brisman, A., & South, N. (In press). Food, crime, justice and security: (Food) security for whom?. In I. Werkheiser & Z. Piso (Eds.), Food Justice in US and global contexts: Bringing theory and practice together. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress conservation: The preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
  7. Büscher, B. (2015). Reassessing fortress conservation? New media and the politics of distinction in Kruger National Park. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 106(1), 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Childress, J. F. (2001). The war metaphor in public policy: Some moral reflections. In J. C. Ficarrotta (Ed.), The Leader’s imperative: Ethics, integrity, and responsibility (pp. 181–197). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  9. CITES. (2013). Report on measures being taken by Uganda to combat illegal ivory trade. SC63 Doc. 18, Annex 4.Google Scholar
  10. CITES. (2015a). Increasing attention on illegal trade in wildlifeA visual summary of key events and measures since 2012. Retrieved from Accessed July 13, 2016.
  11. CITES. (2015b). National ivory action plan progress report. Parties of primary concern. Uganda. 66th Standing Committee meeting, Document 29, Annex 9.Google Scholar
  12. Delmas-Marty, M. (2007). The paradigm of the war on crime. Legitimating inhuman treatment? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(2007), 584–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duffy, R. (1999). The role and limitations of state coercion: Anti-poaching policies in Zimbabwe. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 17(1), 97–121. doi: 10.1080/02589009908729640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy, R. (2014). Waging a war to save biodiversity: The rise of militarized conservation. International Affairs, 90(4), 819–834. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duffy, R. (2016a). Militarising conservation: A triple ‘fail’ for security, people and wildlife. Retrieved from Accessed July 19, 2016.
  16. Duffy, R. (2016b). War, by conservation. Geoforum, 69, 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duffy, R., St John, F. A. V., Büscher, B., & Brockington, D. A. N. (2015). The militarization of anti-poaching: Undermining long term goals? Environmental Conservation, 42(4), 345–348. doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fajardo del Castillo, T. (2016). The European Union’s approach in the fight against wildlife trafficking: Challenges ahead. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 19(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. George, J. (1994). Discourses of global politics: A critical (re)introduction to international relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hallsworth, S., & Lea, J. (2011). Reconstructing Leviathan: Emerging contours of the security state. Theoretical Criminology, 15(2), 141–157. doi: 10.1177/1362480610383451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, M., Roe, D., Baker, J., Mwedde, G., Travers, H., Plumptre, A., et al. (2015). Wildlife crime: A review of the evidence on drivers and impacts in Uganda. London: IIED Research Report.Google Scholar
  23. Hartter, J., & Goldman, A. C. (2009). Life on the edge: Balancing biodiversity, conservation, and sustaining rural livelihoods around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Focus on Geography, 52(1), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henry, S., & Milovanovic, D. (Eds.) (1999). Constitutive criminology at work: Applications to crime and justice. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heroux, G. (2011). War on the poor: Urban poverty, target policing and social control. In M. Neocleous & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Anti-security. Ottawa: Red Quill Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hulme, D., & Murphree, M. W. (2001). Community conservation as policy: Promise and performance. In D. Hulme & M. W. Murphree (Eds.), African wildlife & livelihoods: The promise and performance of community conservation. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
  27. Humphreys, J. (2012). Resource wars: Searching for a new definition. International Affairs, 88(5), 1065–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutton, J., Adams, W. M., & Murombedzi, J. C. (2005). Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies, 32(2), 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutton, J. M., & Leader-Williams, N. (2003). Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: Realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx, 37(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacoby, K. (2001). Crimes against nature: Squatters, poachers, thieves, and the hidden history of American conservation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kagari, M., & Edroma, E. (2006). The police, the people, the politics: Police accountability in Uganda. Nairobi: Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI).Google Scholar
  32. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lepp, A., & Holland, S. (2006). A comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the village of Bigodi, Uganda. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 609–623. doi: 10.1080/08941920600742377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linnemann, T. (2013). Governing through meth: Local politics, drug control and the drift toward securitization. Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 9(1), 39–61. doi: 10.1177/1741659012454125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary expanded ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Lunstrum, E. (2014). Green militarization: Anti-poaching efforts and the spatial contours of Kruger National Park. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(4), 816–832. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.912545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maguire, T., & Haenlein, C. (2015). An illusion of complicity. Terrorism and the illegal ivory trade in East Africa. Retrieved from Accessed September 5, 2016.
  38. McClanahan, B., & Brisman, A. (2015). Climate change and peacemaking criminology: Ecophilosophy, peace and security in the “war on climate change”. Critical Criminology, 23(4), 417–431. doi: 10.1007/s10612-015-9291-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mcclanahan, B., & Wall, T. (2016). ‘Do some anti-poaching, kill some bad guys, and do some good’: Manhunting, accumulation and pacification in African conservation. In G. R. Potter, A. Nurse, & M. Hall (Eds.), The geography of environmental crime: Conservation, wildlife crime and environmental activism (pp. 121–147). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCulloch, J., & Wilson, D. (2016). Pre-crime: Pre-emption, precaution and the future. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ministry of Tourism Wildlife and Antiquities. (2014). Sector statistical abstract 2014. Kampala: Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities.Google Scholar
  43. Moghari, N. M. (2009). A survey of Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP) communities attitudes toward human-lion conflict and lion conservation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. George Mason University.Google Scholar
  44. Moreto, W. D., Brunson, R. K., & Braga, A. A. (2015). ‘Such misconducts don’t make a good ranger’: Examining law enforcement ranger wrongdoing in Uganda. British Journal of Criminology, 55(2), 359–380. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azu079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moreto, W. D., & Lemieux, A. M. (2015). Poaching in Uganda: Perspectives of law enforcement rangers. Deviant Behavior. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2014.977184.Google Scholar
  46. Neocleous, M. (2008). Critique of security. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neocleous, M., & Rigakos, G. S. (2011). Introduction. In M. Neocleous & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Anti-security. Ottawa: Red Quill Books.Google Scholar
  48. Neumann, R. P. (2004). Moral and discursive geographies in the war for biodiversity in Africa. Political Geography, 23(7), 813–837. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newmark, W. D., & Hough, J. L. (2000). Conserving wildlife in Africa: Integrated conservation and development projects and beyond. BioScience, 50(7), 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nurse, A. (2015). Policing wildlife: Perspectives on the enforcement of wildlife legislation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Onyango, J. E. (2016). Uganda: Poachers kill UWA staff in gun fire exchange. Retrieved from Accessed January 24, 2017.
  52. Pires, S. F., & Moreto, W. D. (2011). Preventing wildlife crimes: Solutions that can overcome the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 17, 101–123. doi: 10.1007/s10610-011-9141-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rademeyer, J. (2016). Tipping point. Transnational organised crime and the ‘war’ on poaching. Part 1 of a 2-part investigation into rhino horn trafficking in Southern Africa. Geneva: The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime.Google Scholar
  54. Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Richardson, L. (1990). Writing strategies: Reaching diverse audiences. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rigakos, G. S. (2011). To extend the scope of productive labour: Pacification as a police project. In M. Neocleous & G. S. Rigakos (Eds.), Anti-security. Ottawa: Red Quill Books.Google Scholar
  57. Runhovde, S. R. (2017). Merely a transit country? Examining the role of Uganda in the transnational illegal ivory trade. Trends in Organized Crime. doi: 10.1007/s12117-016-9299-7.Google Scholar
  58. Shaw, M., & Rademeyer, J. (2016). A flawed war: Rethinking ‘green militarization’ in the Kruger National Park. Politikon. doi: 10.1080/02589346.2016.1201379.Google Scholar
  59. Siurua, H. (2006). Nature above people: Rolston and “fortress” conservation in the South. Ethics & The Environment, 11(1), 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tetana, P. (2014). Shoot poachers on sightMuseveni. Retrieved from Accessed September 13, 2016.
  62. The Citizen. (2016). Poachers kill six elephants in Uganda Queen Elizabeth park. Retrieved from Accessed November 3, 2016.
  63. The Department of State. (2016). Congressional budget justification foreign operations. Appendix 2. Fiscal year 2017. Retrieved from Accessed February 6, 2017.
  64. The Uganda Wildlife Act. (2000). Uganda Wildlife Act, Cap 200. Laws of Uganda, Revised Edition, 2000. Retrieved from Accessed October 30, 2016.
  65. Titeca, K., & Herdt, T. D. (2010). Regulation, cross-border trade and practical norms in West Nile, North-Western Uganda. Africa, 80(4), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tumusiime, D. M., Vedeld, P., & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2011). Breaking the law? Illegal livelihoods from a protected area in Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Uganda Police. (2014). Annual crime and traffic/road safety report 2013. Retrieved from Accessed October 05, 2015.
  68. UHRC. (2015). The 17th annual report of the Uganda Human Rights Commission. Kampala: Uganda Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  69. UNODC. (2011). Organized crime and instability in Central Africa. A threat assessment. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
  70. UNODC. (2013). Transnational organized crime in East Africa. A threat assessment. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
  71. UNODC. (2015). Calls for wildlife and forest crime to be treated as serious crime. Retrieved from Accessed.
  72. UWA. (2016). Uganda Wildlife Authority. About Retrieved from Accessed August 10, 2016.
  73. von Essen, E., Hansen, H. P., Kallstrom, H. N., Peterson, M. N., & Peterson, T. R. (2014). Deconstructing the poaching phenomenon: A review of typologies for understanding illegal hunting. British Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 632–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wall, T., & McClanahan, B. (2015). Weaponising conservation in the ‘Heart of Darkness’: The war on poachers and the neoclassical hunt. In A. Brisman, N. South, & R. White (Eds.), Environmental crime and social conflict: Contemporary and emerging issues. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  75. WCS. (2016). Wildlife Conservation Society Uganda. Retrieved from Accessed August 11, 2016.
  76. White, R. (2011). Transnational environmental crime. Toward an eco-global criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. White, R. (2013). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology: An introduction to the study of environmental harm. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wood, J., & Shearing, C. (2007). Imagining security. Portland: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  80. Wright, G. (2011). Conceptualising and combating transnational environmental crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 14(4), 332–346. doi: 10.1007/s12117-011-9130-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wyatt, T. (2013). Wildlife trafficking: A deconstruction of the crime, the victims, and the offenders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Young, J. (2007). The vertigo of late modernity. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Zedner, L. (2004). Criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Zedner, L. (2009). Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Zedner, L. (2010). Security, the state, and the citizen: The changing architecture of crime control. New Criminal Law Review: In International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 379–403. doi: 10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.379.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politihøgskolen (Norwegian Police University College)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations