Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–19 | Cite as

An Exploratory Study of Influences on Vulnerabilities to Family Violence Among Vietnamese Wives Who Marry South Korean Men

  • Suyeon Park
  • Merry Morash
Article

Abstract

This article describes an exploratory study of why Vietnamese women who migrate to marry South Korean men are vulnerable to abuse. Inductive qualitative analysis of data from 22 Vietnamese wives who experienced abuse reveals inconsistencies in their expectations and their Korean husbands’ and in-laws’ expectations about their roles and influence in their Korean families and their provision of assistance to their Vietnamese families. A marriage broker system in both Vietnam and Korea supports these inconsistent expectations. Abuse and control result when Korean husbands and in-laws act to enforce their expectations of the women’s role in the family and to prevent their leaving the home.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Monthly Household Income Korean Language Social Service Provider Vietnamese Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abraham, M. (1999). Sexual abuse in South Asian immigrant marriages. Violence Against Women, 5(6), 591–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belanger, D., Lee, H. K., & Wang, H. (2010). Ethnic diversity and statistics in East Asia: ‘Foreign brides’ surveys in Taiwan and South Korea. Ethnic & Racial Studies, 33(6), 1108–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belanger, D., & Linh, T. G. (2011). The impact of transnational migration on gender and marriage in sending communities of Vietnam. Current Sociology, 59(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byoun, S. J., & Leung, P. (2015). Understanding the cultural adaptation of foreign wives of South Korean men. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 25(2), 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byun, W., Lee, M., Kim, H., Hwang, J., & Lee, S. (2008). 결혼이민자여성의 가정폭력피해현황과지원체계개선방안 [Domestic violence against marriage immigrants and support enhancements]. Seoul: Korean Women’s Development Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Chae, S. M., Park, J. W., & Kang, H. S. (2014). Relationships of acculturative stress, depression, and social support to health-related quality of life in Vietnamese immigrant women in South Korea. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 25(2), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, K. S., & Song, M. Y. (2010). The stranded individualizer under compressed modernity: South Korean women in individualization without individualism. British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 539–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhuri, S., Morash, M., & Yingling, J. (2014). Marriage migration, patriarchal bargains, and wife abuse: A study of South Asian women. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, C. C., & Choo, H. Y. (2015). Women’s migration for domestic work and cross-border marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Reproducing domesticity, contesting citizenship. Sociology Compass, 9(8), 654–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, S. (2011). Sexual protection, citizenship and nationhood: Prostituted women and migrant wives in South Korea. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(10), 1627–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin, M. (2011). Family attitudes and gender role divisions of married women in contemporary Vietnam and Korea. International Journal of Human Ecology, 12(2), 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiu, S. W., & Wong, R. K. (2009). A literature review on family policy in four East Asian countries. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. Choi, G., & Byoun, S. (2014). Domestic violence against migrant women in South Korea: Addressing the needs of a uniquely situated victim population in domestic violence policy. International Social Work, 57(6), 645–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chun, H., & Dasgupta, M. (2009). Gender discrimination in sex selective abortions and its transition in South Korea. Women’s Studies International Forum, 32(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chung, G. H., & Yoo, J. P. (2013). Using the multicultural family support centers and adjustment among interethnic and interracial families in South Korea. Family Relations, 62(1), 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dasgupta, S. D., & Warrier, S. (1996). In the footsteps of “Arundhati”: Asian Indian women’s experience of domestic violence in the United States. Violence Against Women, 2(3), 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goh, H., Kim, H. M., Soh, R., Kim, J. S., & Kim, J. (2005). 국제결혼 중계 시스템: 베트남, 필리핀 현지 실태 조사 [International marriage broker system: Survey report in Vietnam and the Philippines]. Seoul: Presidential Committee on Social Inclusion.Google Scholar
  19. Jakobsen, H. (2014). What’s gendered about gender-based volence? An empirically grounded theoretical exploration from Tanzania. Gender & Society, 28(4), 537–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, G. (2012). International marriage in Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? ARI working paper no. 174. Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, G., & Shen, H. (2008). International marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Trends and research emphases. Citizenship Studies, 12(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jung, H. (2014). Let their voices be seen: Exploring mental mapping as a feminist visual methodology for the study of migrant women. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 985–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for intervention. Family Court Review, 46(3), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, H. K. (2012). Marriage migration between South Korea and Vietnam: A gender perspective. Asian Perspective, 36(3), 531–563.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, H. M. (2015). Intimacies and remittances: The material bases for love and intimate labor between Korean men and their foreign spouses in South Korea. In S. L. Friedman & P. Mahdavi (Eds.), Migrant encounters: Intimate labor, the state, and mobility across Asia (pp. 25–45). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, J., Yang, S. B., & Torneo, A. (2014). Marriage immigration and multicultural families: Public policies and their implications for the Philippines and South Korea. Asian Politics & Policy, 6(1), 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, J. N. (2015). Problems and solutions for Multi-Cultural Family Support Act. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 20(6), 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, M. (2013). Citizenship projects for marriage migrants in South Korea: Intersecting motherhood with ethnicity and class. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(4), 455–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, M. H. (2015). Issues in the international marriage brokerage business according to information asymmetry in South Korea with alternative suggestions. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 119, 73–77.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, M. H. (2016). Paradoxical situation after South Korea’s recent reform measures for women marriage migrants. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 131, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, S. (2015). Soft talk, hard realities: Multiculturalism as the South Korean government’s decoupled response to international migration. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 24(1), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, S. J. (2003). The economic status and role of ethnic Koreans in China. In C. F. Borgatta & I. Choi (Eds.), The Korean diaspora in the world economy (pp. 101–127). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  34. Kojima, Yu. (2001). In the business of cultural reproduction: Theoretical implications of the mail-order bride phenomenon. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(2), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kwaak, J. (February 7, 2014). South Korea tightens rules on marriages to foreigners. The Wall Street Journal. http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2014/02/07/south-korea-tightens-rules-on-marriages-to-foreigners/.
  36. Kyriakakis, S., Dawson, B. A., & Edmond, T. (2012). Mexican immigrant survivors of intimate partner violence: Conceptualization and descriptions of abuse. Violence and Victims, 27(4), 548–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Le, D. B., Truong, T., & Khuat, T. H. (2014). Transnational marriage migration and the East Asian family-based welfare model: Social reproduction in Vietnam, Taiwan, and South Korea. In T. Truong, D. Gasper, J. Handmaker, & S. I. Bergh (Eds.), Migration, gender and social Justice: Perspectives on human insecurity (Vol. 9, pp. 87–103). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, H. (2014). Trafficking in women? Or multicultural family? The contextual difference of commodification of intimacy. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21(10), 1249–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, J., Lee, R., & Park, M. (2016). Fathers’ alcohol use and spousal abuse and mothers’ child abuse in multicultural families in South Korea: The mediating role of acculturation and parenting stress. Children and Youth Services Review, 63, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levitt, P. (2011). Constructing gender across borders: A transnational approach. In E. N. Chow, M. T. Segal, & L. Tan (Eds.), Analyzing gender, intersectionality, and multiple inequalities: Global, transnational and local contexts. Advances in gender research (Vol. 15, pp. 163–183). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacLean, D. (2014). Marriage migrants and commercial marriage trafficking in South Korea: Mapping the current legal regime and gaps in addressing exploitation. KLRI Journal of Law and Policy, 4(1), 3–51.Google Scholar
  42. Mehrotra, M. (1999). The social construction of wife abuse: Experiences of Asian Indian women in the United States. Violence Against Women, 5(6), 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menjívar, C., & Salcido, O. (2002). Immigrant women and domestic violence common experiences in different countries. Gender & Society, 16(6), 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ministry of Gender Equality and Families, Korean Women’s Development Institute. (2013). 2012년 전국 다문화가족 실태 조사 연구 [A study on the National Survey of Multicultural Families 2012]. Seoul: Ministry of Gender Equality and Families.Google Scholar
  45. Minot, N., Baulch, B., & Epprecht, M. (2006). Poverty and inequality in Vietnam: Spatial patterns and geographic determinants. Research report no. 148. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Nguyen, P. (2007). An analysis of decision processes for marriage migration of Vietnamese women with Taiwanese men (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database (UMI No. 1442385).Google Scholar
  47. Nguyen, X., & Tran, X. (2010). Vietnamese-Taiwanese marriages. In W. Yang & M. C. Lu (Eds.), Asian cross-border marriage migration: Demographic patterns and social issues (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Palriwala, R., & Uberoi, P. (2008). Marriage migration and gender (Vol. 5)., Women and migration in Asia series New Delhi: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Park, C., & Cho, N. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and development review, 21(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pham, B. T. (2013). Cross-border marriage migration between Vietnam and Korea: Focusing up on life of Vietnamese brides in Korea (Doctoral dissertation, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan). http://dspace.lib.kanazawa-u.ac.jp/dspace/handle/2297/37396.
  51. Raj, A., Livramento, K. N., Santana, M. C., Gupta, J., & Silverman, J. G. (2006). Victims of intimate partner violence more likely to report abuse from in-laws. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 936–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seol, D. (2006). Women marriage immigrants in Korea: Immigration process and adaptation. Asia-Pacific Forum, 33, 32–59.Google Scholar
  53. Seol, D., Kim, Y., Kim, H., Yoon, H., Lee, H. K., Yim, K., et al. (2005). 국제결혼 이주여성 실태조사 및 보건 복지 지원 정책 방안 [Foreign wives’ life in Korea: Focusing on the policy of welfare and health]. Kwachon: Ministry of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
  54. Seol, D., Lee, H. K., & Cho, S. (2006). 결혼이민자 가족 실태조사 및 중장기 지원 정책 방안 연구 [Survey on international marriage female migrants and policy measures for health welfare support]. Seoul: Ministry of Gender Equity & Family.Google Scholar
  55. Song, J. (2015). Five phases of brokered international marriages in South Korea: A complexity perspective. Asian Studies, 1(1), 147–176.Google Scholar
  56. Song, J. (2016). The politics of immigrant incorporation policies in Korea and Japan. Asian Perspective, 40(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  57. Stankuniene, V., & Maslauskaite, E. (2008). Family transformations in the post-communist countries: Attitudes toward changes and the ideational shift. In C. Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies (pp. 113–137). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Statistics Korea. (2008). Household income & expenditure trends in the fourth quarter and in 2007. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/pressReleases/6/1/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=272817&pageNo=4&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
  59. Statistics Korea. (2015). 국제결혼현황 [Current status of international marriage]. http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=2430.
  60. Than, T. T. H. (2006). 국제결혼 베트남 이주여성의 현실과 적응: 메콩델타지역 농촌 여성의 사례를 중심으로 [The reality and adaption of Vietnamese women in cross-cultural marriages: the case of Mekong Delta women in Korea] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Seongnam, Korea: The Academy of Korean Studies.Google Scholar
  61. Thao, N. T. (2016a). Different effects of acculturative stress and family life stress on depressive symptoms among married Vietnamese immigrant women in South Korea. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 10, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thao, N. T. (2016b). Family life stress, coping, and mental health among Vietnamese marriage migrant women in South Korea: A Mixed Methods Study. VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 194–212.Google Scholar
  63. Wie, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Legal entitlement and bargaining power of marriage immigrants in Korea. GRIPS discussion papers. https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=1282&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=24.
  64. Yang, H. (2011). “Multicultural families” in South Korea: A socio-legal approach. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 37(1), 47–81.Google Scholar
  65. Yang, W., & Lu, M. C. (2010). Asian cross-border marriage migration: Demographic patterns and social issues. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yoon, J. (November 22, 2015). Multicultural marriages decreasing. The Korea Times. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2016/02/123_191568.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeSUNY PlattsburghPlattsburghUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations