Critical Criminology

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 489–501 | Cite as

Convict Criminology and the Struggle for Inclusion

  • Jeffrey Ian Ross
  • Richard S. Jones
  • Mike Lenza
  • Stephen C. Richards


Convict Criminology (CC) began in the early 1990s as a reaction to the then current state of academic criminology that did not adequately reflect the voices of convicted felons. Since its beginnings, CC has attempted to draw attention to a range of problems created by the criminal justice apparatus and defenders of the status quo. Dr. Joanne Belknap’s 2014 ASC presidential address and subsequent article presented an argument that stressed the importance of activism to be considered as part of criminological research. In the process, she reviewed her career and then criticized the field of Critical Criminology, in particular Convict Criminology. The article, however, ignored the numerous efforts that CC has engaged in to build an inclusive group school, movement, organization and network that includes the diverse voices of Ph.D. educated convicts and excons, and overall reflected a superficial understanding of the history and intent of Convict Criminology. This article attempts to explain the shortcomings of Belknap’s article and clarifies misunderstandings.


  1. Becker, H. (1970). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(1), 239–247.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Belknap, J. (2015). Activist criminology: Criminologists’ responsibility to advocate for social and legal justice, the 2014 American Society of Criminology Presidential Address. Criminology, 53(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeNardo, J. (1985/2014). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Earle, R. (2014). Insider and out: Making sense of a prison experience and a research experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Earle, R. (2016). Convict criminology: Inside and out. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Gonnerman, J. (2005). Life on the outside. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  8. Gouldner, A. (1968). The sociologist as partisan: Sociology and the welfare state. The American Sociologist, 3(1), 103–116.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, R. S., Ross, J. I., Richards, S. C., & Murphy, D. S. (2009). The first dime: A decade of convict criminology. The Prison Journal, 89(2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller, E. M. (1986). Street women. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Newbold, G., & Ross, J. I. (2013). Convict criminology at the crossroads. The Prison Journal, 93(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  12. Newbold, G., Ross, J. I., & Richards, S. C. (2010). The emerging field of convict criminology. In F. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminological theory (pp. 2010–2012). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. New York Times. (2015). Editorial. College applications and criminal records. New York Times, March 14, 2015. Downloaded March 17, 2015.
  14. Owen, B. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Presidential Plenary Session. (November, 2008). Convict criminology. In S. C. Richards, G. D. Curry, J. Irwin & J. I. Ross (Eds.), The annual conference of the American Society of Criminology, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  17. Richards, S. C. (2013). The new school of convict criminology thrives and matures. Critical Criminology, 21(3), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richards, S. C., Newbold, G., & Ross, J. I. (2009). Convict criminology. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 356–363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Richards, S. C., Ross, J. I., Jones, R. S., Newbold, G., Murphy, D. S., & Grigsby, B. (2011). Convict criminology: Prisoner re-entry policy recommendations. In I. O. Ekunwe & R. S. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on re-entry (pp. 198–222). Tampere, FI: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ross, J. I., Darke, S., Aresti, A., Newbold, G., & Earle, R. (2014). The development of convict criminology beyond North America. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ross, J. I., & Richards, S. C. (2002). Behind bars: Surviving prison. Indianapolis: Alpha Books.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, J. I., & Richards, S. C. (Eds.). (2003). Convict criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Ross, J. I., & Richards, S. C. (2009). Beyond bars: Rejoining society after prison. Indianapolis: Alpha Books.Google Scholar
  24. Ross, J. I., Richards, S. C., Newbold, G., Jones, R. S., Lenza, M., Murphy, D. S., et al. (2011a). Knocking on the ivory tower’s door: The experience of ex-convicts applying for tenure-track university positions. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(2), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross, J. I., Richards, S. C., Newbold, G., Lenza, M., & Grisby, R. S. (2011b). Convict criminology. In W. S. DeKeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Handbook of critical criminology (pp. 160–171). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Ross, J. I., Zaldivar, M., & Tewksbury, R. (2015). Breaking out of prison and into print? Rationales and strategies to assist educated convicts conduct scholarly research and writing behind bars. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 23(1), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Yeager, M. (2016). Frank Tannebaum: The making of a convict criminologist. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Ian Ross
    • 1
  • Richard S. Jones
    • 2
  • Mike Lenza
    • 3
  • Stephen C. Richards
    • 3
  1. 1.University of BaltimoreBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Marquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA
  3. 3.University of Wisconsin – OshkoshOshkoshUSA

Personalised recommendations