Critical Criminology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 163–177 | Cite as

Toys for the Boys? Drones, Pleasure and Popular Culture in the Militarisation of Policing

  • Michael SalterEmail author
Original Article


This paper argues that the various and contradictory rationales offered for law enforcement drones are symptomatic of a ‘weapons fetish’ evident in popular culture. This fetishisation imbues military technology such as the drone with masculine fantasies of control and domination that obscure the practical limitations and ethical implications of drones for crime control and prevention. By linking the pleasures of militarism to crucial shifts in the social and economic order, the paper argues that counter-terrorism discourse functions to legitimate the militarised masculine subject positions of paramilitary policing specifically and the neoliberal state generally. In such a context, the drone features as a regressive ‘weapon-toy’ that fuses state control with technological transcendence.


Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Life Cycle Cost Crime Control Police Agency Unmanned Aerial System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abe, N. (2012) Dreams in infrared: The woes of an American drone operator. Spiegel Online, December 14.
  2. Andreas, P., & Price, R. (2001). From war fighting to crime fighting: Transforming the American national security state. International Studies Review, 3(3), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (2004). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  4. Balcerzak, A., & Hiegel, T. (2013). Police forces struggle to incroporate drones, Medill National Security Zone, March 18.
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. St Lois: Telos Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. BBC News. (2013, February 7). Irans hows ‘hacked US spy drone’ video footage, pp.
  8. Benjamin, M. (2013). Drone warfare: Killing by remote control. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, B. (2011). Police employ Predator drone spy planes on the home front, Los Angeles Times, December 10.
  10. Berenson, A. (2004) As police use of tasers rises, questions over safety increase, New York Times, July 18.
  11. Bohm, A. (2013). Status of domestic drone legislation in the States, American Civil Liberties Union, June 21.
  12. Boyle, A. (2012). The US and its UAVs: A cost-benefit analysis, American Security Project, July 24.
  13. Braudy, L. (2005). From chivalry to terrorism: War and the changing nature of masculinity. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Coe, K., Domke, D., Bagley, M. M., Cunningham, S., & Van Leuven, N. (2007). Masculinity as political strategy: George W. Bush, the “War on Terrorism”, and an echoing press. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 29(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole, D. (2013a). Laying down the law: Why Obama’s targeted killing is better than Bush’s torture, Foreign Policy, February 12.
  16. Cole, D. (2013b). Obama’s long road to peace, New York Review of Books, May 24.
  17. Cole, D. (2013c). What’s wrong with Obama’s drone policy, The Nation, February 13.
  18. Congressional Budget Office. (2011). Policy options for unmanned aircraft systems. Congress of the United States.
  19. Corbett, R., & Marx, G. T. (1991). Critique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the electronic monitoring movement. Justice Quarterly, 8(3), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corcoran, M. (2013a). Drone wars: The definition dogfight, ABC News, March 1.
  21. Corcoran, M. (2013b). Drones set for commercial take-off, ABC News, May 24.
  22. Cowen, D., & Siciliano, A. (2011). Surplus masculinities and security. Antipode, 43(5), 1516–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crelinsten, R. D. (1998). The discourse and practice of counter-terrorism in liberal democracies. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 44(3), 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crosset, T. W. (1990). Masculinity, sexuality and the development of early modern sport. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives. Campaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  25. Crouch, B., & Hunt, N. (2013). SA police to use unmanned drones to spy on criminals,, June 19.
  26. Dant, T. (1996). Fetishism and the social value of objects. Sociological Review, 44(3), 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Der Derian, J. (2009). Virtuous war: Mapping the military-industrial-media-entertainment network (2nd ed.). New York and Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Dodge, M., Valcore, L., & Gomez, F. (2011). Women on SWAT teams: Separate but equal. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 34(4), 699–712.Google Scholar
  29. Drew, C. (2009). Drones are U.S. weapons of choice in fighting Qaeda, New York Times, March 16.
  30. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2003). Sim capital: General intellect, world market, species being and the video game. In M. Bousquet and K. Wills (Eds.), The politics of information: The electronic mediation of social change (pp. 122–140): Alt-X Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dyer-Witheford, N., & De Peuter, G. (2009). Games of empire: Global capitalism and video gams. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  32. Enloe, C. (2000). Manuevers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Estes, S. (2005). I am a man! Race, manhood and the civil rights movement. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fernbach, A. (2000). The fetishization of masculinity in science fiction: The cyborg and the console cowboy. Science Fiction Studies, 27(2), 234–255.Google Scholar
  35. Gibbs, J. (2010). Looking at terrorism through left realist lenses. Crime, Law and Social Change, 54(2), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson, J. W. (1994). Warrior dreams: Manhood in post-Vietnam America. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  37. Giroux, H. A. (2001). Private satisfactions and public disorders: ‘Fight Club’, patriarchy and the politics of masculine violence. JAC: A Journal of Compositional Theory, 21(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  38. Greenwald, G. (2011). The growing menace of domestic drones, Salon, December 13.
  39. Greenwald, G. (2013). Domestic drones and their unique dangers, Guardian, March 30.
  40. Gruber, B. (2011). Critics raise the alarm over U.S. police drone plans. Reuters, November 1.
  41. Haddal, C. C., & Gertler, J. (2010). Homeland security: Unmanned aerial vehicles and border surveillance. Congressional Research Service.
  42. Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2001). The military technostructures of policing. In P. Kraska (Ed.), Militarizing the American criminal justice system: The changing roles of the Armed Forces and the police (pp. 43–64). Boston: Northestern University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  44. Higate, P., & Hopton, J. (2005). War, militarism and masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 432–447). California: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hill, K. (2012). The drone that crashed into a S.W.A.T. team’s tank, Forbes, May 3.
  46. Hill, S., & Beger, R. (2009). A paramilitary policing juggernaut. Social Justice, 36(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
  47. Hill, S. M., Beger, R. R., & Zanetti, J. M. (2007). Plugging the security gap or springing a leak: Questioning the growth of paramilitary policing in US domestic and foreign policy. Democracy and Security, 3(3), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hopkins, N. (2013). Revealed: Who can fly drones in UK airspace, Guardian, January 26.
  49. Hull, L. (2010). Drone makes first UK ‘arrest’ as police catch car theif heiding under bushes. Mail Online, February 12.
  50. Jefferson, T. (1990). The case against paramilitary policing. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, L. (2013). Rand Paul backs drone killing of hypothetical armed robber, Huffington Post, April 23.
  52. Kahn, P. W. (2013). Imagining warfare. European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. King, C. A. (2007). Arming desire: The sexual force of guns in the United States. In C. Fruehling Springwood (Ed.), Open fire: Understanding global gun cultures (pp. 87–97). Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  54. Koebler, J. (2013). Maine State Police purchase $300 ‘toy’ drone; using it would be illegal,, March 1.
  55. Kraska, P. (1997). Enjoying militarism: Political/personal dilemmas in studying U.S. police paramilitary units. Justice Quarterly, 13, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kraska, P. (2001a). Crime control as warfare: Language matters. In P. Kraska (Ed.), Militarizing the American criminal justice system: The changing roles of the Armed Forces and the police (pp. 14–28). Boston: Northestern University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kraska, P. (2001b). Playing war: Masculinity, militarism and their real-life consequences. In P. Kraska (Ed.), Militarizing the American criminal justice system: The changing roles of the Armed Forces and the police (pp. 141–157). Boston: Northestern University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kraska, P. B. (2007). Militarization and policing: Its relevance to 21st century police. Policing, 1(4), 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kraska, P., & Kappeler, V. E. (1997). Militarizing American police: The rise and normalization of paramilitary units. Social Problems, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kraska, P. B., & Paulsen, D. J. (1997). Grounded research into U.S. paramilitary policing: Forging the iron fist inside the velvet glove. Policing and Society, 7(4), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kurtz, D. L., Linnemann, T., & Williams, L. S. (2012). Reinventing the matron: The continued importance of gendered images and division of labour in modern policing. Women and Criminal Justice, 22(3), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Levin, A. (2012). FAA going slow on drones as privacy concerns studied, Bloomberg, November 26.
  63. Liddle, A. M. (1996). State, masculinities and law: Some comments on gender and English state-formation. British Journal of Criminology, 36(3), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Luckham, R. (1984). Armament culture. Alternatives, 10(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lyon, D., & Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
  66. Mann, M. (1987). The roots and contradictions of militarism. New Left Review, 162, 35–50.Google Scholar
  67. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. McBride, P. (2009). Beyond Orwell: The application of unmanned aircraft systems in domestic surveillance operations. The Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 74, 627–662.Google Scholar
  69. McCulloch, J. (2001). Blue army: Paramilitary policing in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  70. McCulloch, J. (2007). Transnational crime as productive fiction. Social Justice, 34(2), 19–32.Google Scholar
  71. McCulloch, J., & Pickering, S. (2009). Pre-crime and counter-terrorism: Imagining future crime in the ‘War on Terror’. British Journal of Criminology, 49(5), 628–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McCulloch, J., & Sentas, V. (2006). The killing of Jean Charles de Menezes: Hyper-militarism in the neoliberal econmic free-fire zone. Social Justice, 33(4), 92–106.Google Scholar
  73. McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant masculinities: Emlpoyment change and white working class youth. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McDermott, N. (2010). Police drones grounded for breaking the law. Mail Online, February 16.
  75. Meeks, D. (2005). Police militarization in urban areas: The obscure war against the underclass. The Black Scholar, 35(4), 33–41.Google Scholar
  76. Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Monahan, T. (2010a). The future of security? Surveillance operations at homeland security fusion centres. Social Justice, 37(2/3), 84–98.Google Scholar
  78. Monahan, T. (2010b). Surveillance in the time of insecurity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Moyn, S. (2013). Drones and Imagination: A Response to Paul Kahn. European Journal of International Law, 24(1), 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Quinney, R. (1974). Critique of legal order: Crime control in capitalist societies. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  81. Rantatalo, O. (2012). The miscellany of militaristic policing: A literature review. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 7(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Reed, B, Jr. (2008). Future technology in law enforcement. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 77(5), 15–21.Google Scholar
  83. Robert, A., & Nye, B. (2007). Western masculinities in war and peace. The American Historical Review, 112(2), 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rush, M. (2013). Chief Sam Dotson wants to use drones to fight crime,, June 24,
  85. Savran, D. (1998). Taking it like a man: White masculinity, masochism and contemporary American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the twenty-first century. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  87. Singer (2012). Do drones undermine democracy. New York Times, January 21,
  88. Stanton, R. (2011). Texas civil libertarians have eye on police drones, Houston Chronicle, October 31.
  89. Stewart, C. (2012). Drones, lives and liberties. The Australian, 1 March, 11.Google Scholar
  90. Tomsen, S. (2009). Violence, prejudice and sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Traynor, L. (2011)…. er, we’ve lost our drone: £13 k device is sunk without a trace in Mersey, Liverpool Echo, October 31.Google Scholar
  92. Tyson, D. (2013). Sex, cuplability and the defence of provocation. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Virilio, P. (1984). War and cinema: The logistics of perception. London and Brooklyn: Verso.Google Scholar
  94. Virilio, P. (2005). Desert screen. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  95. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wall, T., & Monahan, T. (2011). Surveillance and violence from afar: The politics of drones and liminal security-scapes. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Science and PsychologyUniversity of Western SydneyPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations