Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Criminology and Human-Animal Violence Research: The Contribution and the Challenge

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using theories concerning human-animal abuse links this paper assesses the role(s) that criminology can play in understanding human-animal relationships. That this is not a one-way process of knowledge transferral is acknowledged with analysis of the contribution that human-animal studies can offer in return. Following a brief outline of human-animal abuse theses the contributions that criminology can play in furthering understandings of, and informing responses to, this phenomenon are discussed. A critique of mainstream approaches towards human-animal abuse links, namely, their conceptualization of animals as tools, is then outlined. The argument that anthropocentric approaches to the study of interhuman violence actually reinforce the forms of oppression which create and maintain such forms of violence in the first place, is then developed. The author concludes that the incorporation of human-animal relationships into criminology offers something in return, i.e. an opportunity to re-think the modernist foundations upon which (traditional) criminology is built.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. (1990). The sexual politics of meat. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (1994). Bringing peace home: A feminist philosophical perspective on the abuse of women, children and pet animals. Hypatia, 9(2), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (1995). Woman battering and harm to animals. In C. Adams & J. Donovan (Eds.), Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explanations (pp. 55–84). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (Eds.) (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explanations. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (1998). The causes of animal abuse: A social-psychological analysis. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Humane (2008) Pets in domestic violence protective order laws. American Humane’s Office of Public Policy, Dec 2008.

  • Arluke, A., Levin, J., Luke, C., & Ascione, R. (1999). The relationship of animal abuse to violence and other forms of antisocial behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(9), 963–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A., & Sanders, C. (1996). Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo, B. (2001). Critical criminology, existential humanism, and social justice: Exploring the contours of conceptual integration. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 10(2), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F. (2001). Animal abuse and youth violence. OJJDP: Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Sep 1–15.

  • Ascione, F., & Arkow, P. (Eds.). (1999). Child abuse, domestic violence, and animal abuse: Linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F., Weber, C., & Wood, D. (1997). The abuse of animals and domestic violence: A national survey of shelters for women who are battered. Society & Animals, 5(3), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., & French, L. (2004). Making the links: Child abuse, animal cruelty and domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 13, 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1995). The use and abuse of animals in criminology: A brief history and current review. Social Justice, 22(1), 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2001). Peter Singer’s “Heavy Petting” and the politics of animal sexual assault. Critical Criminology, 10(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2004). From animal abuse to interhuman violence? A critical review of the progression thesis. Society & Animals, 1(1), 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, L. (1998). Feminism, animals, science: The naming of the shrew. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boat, B. (1999). Abuse of children and abuse of animals: Using the links to inform child assessment and protection. In F. Ascione & P. Arkow (Eds.), Child abuse, domestic violence and animal abuse: Linking the circles of compassion for prevention and intervention. Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazaux, G. (1999). Beauty and the beast: Animal abuse from a non-speciesist criminological perspective. Crime, Law & Social Change, 31(2), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Strayer, J. (1996). Empathy in conduct-disordered and comparison youth. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 988–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deviney, E., Dickert, J., & Lockwood, R. (1983). The care of pets within child abusing families. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 3, 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (1990). Animal rights and feminist theory. Signs, 15(2), 330–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favre, D. (2000). Equitable self-ownership for animals. Duke Law Journal, 50(2), 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felthous, A. (1980). Aggression against cats, dogs and people. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 10(3), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, C. (2000). Battered women and their animal companions: Symbolic interaction between human and non-human animals. Society & Animals, 8(2), 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. (1995). Animals, property and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. (1982). Women and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, M. (2004). Against ‘green’ criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 44(6), 833–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1992). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearne, V. (1986). Adam’s task: Calling animals by name. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, D., & Blackman, N. (1966). Enuresis, firesetting and cruelty to animals: A triad predictive of adult crime. American Journal of Psychiatry, 122, 1431–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, S. (1995). Speciesism, racism, nationalism…Or the power of scientific subjectivity. In C. Adams & J. Donovan (Eds.), Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explanations (pp. 320–352). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheel, M. (1995). License to kill: An ecofeminist critique of hunters’ discourse. In C. Adams & J. Donovan (Eds.), Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explanations (pp. 85–125). Durham & London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, R., & Ascione, F. (Eds.). (1998). Cruelty to animals and interpersonal violence. Indiana: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2000). The power of oppression: Understanding the history of criminology as a science of oppression. Critical Criminology, 9(1/2), 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz-Perez, L., Heide, K., & Silverman, I. J. (2001). Childhood cruelty to animals and subsequent violence against humans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(5), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (forthcoming). The underdog in history: Serfdom, slavery and species in the creation and development of capitalism. In N. Taylor & T. Signal (eds). Theorizing animals. Boston & Leiden: Brill Academic Press.

  • Petersen, D., & Farrington, M. (2007). Cruelty to animals and violence to people. Victims and Offenders, 2(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1984). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. (2003). Philosophy and mystification. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruether, R. (1975). New heaven/new earth: Sexist ideology and human liberation. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (1975). Victims of science. London: NAVS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauder, J. (2000). Enacting and enforcing felony animal cruelty laws to prevent violence against humans. Animal Law, 6(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (Ed.). (1986). In defense of animals. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology: A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, M. (1998). The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. London: Heretic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., & Signal, T. (2004). Attitudes to animals: An indicator of interpersonal violence? Journal of the Home Economics Institute of Australia, Inc., 11(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., & Signal, T. (2006). Community demographics and the propensity to report animal cruelty. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9(3), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K., & Gullone, E. (2003). Promotion of empathy and prosocial behaviour in children through humane education. Australian Psychologist, 38(3), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingle, D., Barnard, G. W., Robbin, L., Newman, G., & Hutchinson, D. (1986). Childhood and adolescent characteristics of pedophiles and rapists. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 9, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warchol, G., Zupan, L., & Clack, W. (2003). Transnational criminality: An analysis of the illegal wildlife market in southern Africa. International Criminal Justice Review, 13, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nik Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, N. Criminology and Human-Animal Violence Research: The Contribution and the Challenge. Crit Crim 19, 251–263 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-010-9124-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-010-9124-6

Keywords

Navigation