Critical Criminology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 211–228

Scientific Method and the Crimes of the Powerful

Article
  • 434 Downloads

Abstract

Over the past six decades researchers interested in the crimes of the powerful have developed a respectable body of literature. Owing to the empirical and theoretical richness of these contributions, the crimes of the powerful sub-field is ready for critical interventions to be made on the plane of scientific method. Moreover, such interventions have become increasingly necessary owing to the disciplinary hegemony of an orthodox empiricist approach which erects a problematic boundary between empirical representations of the crimes of the powerful and theoretical explanation. To aid a critique of this approach, this paper will employ the scientific framework of classical Marxism to decipher the peculiar problems which flow out of the orthodoxy’s method. It will be concluded that while classical Marxism offers a more rigorous framework for penetrating analyses of the crimes of the powerful, orthodox scholars have nevertheless made significant contributions which should also be utilised in future research.

References

  1. Banaji, J. (1977). Modes of production in a materialist conception of history. Capital & Class, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, H. C. (1981). Corporate capitalism, corporate crime. Crime & Delinquency, 27(1), 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Box, S. (1983). Power, crime, and mystification. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, J. (1984). Corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul plc.Google Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, J. (1988). White-collar crime, competition, and capitalism: Comment on Coleman. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Criminological theory and organizational crime. Justice Quarterly, 6(3), 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce, A. S., & Becker, P. J. (2007). State-corporate crime and the Paducah gaseous diffusion plant. Western Criminology Review, 8(2), 29–43.Google Scholar
  8. Bukharin, N. (2005). Philosophical arabesque. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93(2), 406–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, J. W. (1988). Competition and the structure of industrial society: Reply to Braithwaite. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 632–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engels, F. (1934). The part played by labour in the transition from ape to man. available online at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1876/part-played-labour/index.htm. Accessed December 30, 2009.
  12. Finney, H. C., & Lesieur, H. R. (1982). A contingency theory of organizational crime. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 255–299.Google Scholar
  13. Friedrichs, D. O. (1996). Trusted criminals: White collar crime in contemporary society. London: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  14. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  15. Gross, E. (1978a). Organizational crime: A theoretical perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 55–85.Google Scholar
  16. Gross, E. (1978b). Organizations as criminal actors. In P. Wilson & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Two faces of deviance: Crimes of the powerless and powerful (pp. 199–213). Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, L. (2009). Corporate financial crime: Social diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Financial Crimes, 16(1), 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). The concept of the ideal. available online at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/ideal/ideal.htm. Accessed December 30, 2009.
  19. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s ‘Capital’. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, A., & Braithwaite, J. (1993). Profits, pressure and corporate law breaking. Crime, Law and Social Change, 20, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. C. (1998). Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kramer, R. C. (1992). The space shuttle challenger explosion. In K. Schlegel & D. Weisburd (Eds.), White collar crime reconsidered (pp. 214–243). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2005). War, aggression, and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 446–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kramer, R. C., Michalowski, R. J., & Kauzlarich, D. (2002). The origins and development of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime & Delinquency, 48(2), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenin, V. I. (1960). Collected works (Vol. 38). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  26. Lenning, E., & Brightman, S. (2009). Oil, rape and state crime in Nigeria. Critical Criminology, 17, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  28. Lukács, G. (1974). Conversations with Lukács. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  29. Lukács, G. (1978). The ontology of social being (Vol. 2). London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  30. Lukács, G. (1980). The ontology of social being (Vol. 3). London: Merlin.Google Scholar
  31. Lukács, G. (1989). A conversation with Georg Lukács. In J. Marcus & Z. Tarr (Eds.), Georg Lukács: Theory, culture and politics (pp. 207–218). New Jersey: Transaction.Google Scholar
  32. Marx, K. (1959). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  33. Marx, K. (1971). A contribution to the critique of political economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  34. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Marx, K. (1978). Capital (Vol. 2). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Marx, K. (1981). Capital (Vol. 3). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1957). The holy family or critique of critical critique. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1968). The German ideology. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  40. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1982). Selected correspondence. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  41. Michalowski, R. J. (1985). Order, law and crime. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  42. Mikhailov, F. (1980). The riddle of the self. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  43. Mullins, C. W. (2009). “He would kill me with his penis”: Genocidal rape in Rwanda as a state crime. Critical Criminology, 17, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mullins, C. W., & Rothe, D. L. (2008a). Blood, power and bedlam: Violations of international criminal law in post-colonial Africa. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  45. Mullins, C. W., & Rothe, D. L. (2008b). Gold, diamonds and blood: International state-corporate crime in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(2), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quinney, R. (1974). Critique of legal order: Crime control in capitalist society. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  47. Quinney, R. (1980). Class, state & crime. London: Longman Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Ross, J. I. (2003). The dynamics of political crime. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Rothe, D. L. (2009). Beyond the law: The Reagan administration and Nicaragua. Critical Criminology, 17, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rothe, D. L. & Ross, J. I. (2009). Private military contractors, crime and the terrain of unaccountability. Justice Quarterly, (iFirst), 1–25.Google Scholar
  51. Schoepfer, A., & Piquero, N. L. (2006). Exploring white-collar crime and the American dream: A partial test of institutional anomie theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snider, L. (2000). A sociology of corporate crime: An obituary. Theoretical Criminology, 4(2), 169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2002). Unmasking the crimes of the powerful. Critical Criminology, 11(3), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2003). Scrutinizing the powerful: Crime, contemporary political economy and critical social research. In S. Tombs & D. Whyte (Eds.), Unmasking the crimes of the powerful (pp. 3–45). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  55. Trotsky, L. (1965). In defense of Marxism. New York: Merit.Google Scholar
  56. Trotsky, L. (1986). Trotsky’s notebooks: 1933–1935. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling unlawful organizational behavior. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vaughan, D. (1998). Rational choice, situated action, and the social control of organizations. Law and Society Review, 32, 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vaughan, D. (2002). Criminology and the sociology of organizations. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminology, Politics, and Social PolicyUniversity of UlsterNewtownabbey, Co. AntrimUK

Personalised recommendations