Critical Criminology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 183–193 | Cite as

The Roots of Modern White-Collar Crime: Does the Modern Form of White-Collar Crime have its Foundation in the Transition from a Society Dominated by Agriculture to One Dominated by Industry?

  • Tage AlalehtoEmail author
  • Daniel Larsson


The purpose of the present paper is to investigate whether the process of transition from an agricultural to an industrial society was a watershed for white-collar crime, such that this type of crime increased rapidly in connection with the industrialization process. The theoretical reasoning behind this notion is that the transition process promoted a mentality characterized by self-centered values and a culture of competitiveness, which together paved the way for fraud perpetrated at the expense of others. The data are from Statistic Sweden’s historical records and cover the period of 1864–1912. Since there is no way to measure all crimes that can be defined as white collar crime, we have used bankruptcy offences as an example of white collar crime. The results do not support the notion that the transition period from an agricultural to an industrial society showed an increase in bankruptcy offences. Instead, the results show that when fluctuations in the economy are taken into account, the industrialization process per se entailed less bankruptcy offences. On the other hand, other research using the case of Sweden has shown that it was first after World War II that bankruptcy offences increased rapidly. Our argument is that the transition process as a structural mechanism had a greater impact on bankruptcy offences when industrialized capitalism became advanced.


Swedish Society Crime Category Capitalist Transition Feudal Society Swedish Labor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Coleman, J. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white-collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 406–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coleman, J. W. (1998). The criminal elite: Understanding white-collar crime. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  3. Colley, R. (2005). The Soreditch tax frauds: A study of the relationship between the state and civil society in 1860. Historical Research, 78, 540–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croall, H. (1992). White collar crime: Criminal justice and criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davia, H. R., Coggins, P., Wideman, J., & Kastantin, J. (2000). Accountant’s guide to fraud detection and control (2nd ed.). USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Edvinsson, R. (2005). Growth, accumulation, crisis: With new macroeconomic data for Sweden 1800–2000. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  7. Friedrichs David, O. (1996). Trusted criminals. New York: Wadsworths.Google Scholar
  8. Geis, G. (2007). White-collar and corporate crime. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Gratzer, K. (2001). Konkurs och kriminalitet i ett jämförande perspektiv under 1900-talet. In: L. Appelgren & H. Sjögren (Eds.). Ekonomisk brottslighet och nationalstatens kontrollmakt, Stockholm: Gidlunds förlag.Google Scholar
  10. Gratzer, K., & Stiefel, D. (2008). History of insolvency and bankruptcy: From an international perspective. Södertörn: Södertörn University.
  11. James, H. (2001). The end of globalization: Lessons from the great depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Locker, J. P., & Godfrey, B. (2006). Ontological boundaries and temporal watersheds in the development of white-collar crime. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 976–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Magnusson, L. (1996). Sveriges ekonomiska historia. Stockholm: Tiden/Athena.Google Scholar
  14. Magnusson, L. (2000). Den tredje industriella revolutionen—och den svenska arbetsmarknaden. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
  15. Magnusson, L., & Ottosson, J. (2003). Den tredje industriella revolutionen och “den nya ekonomin”—mellan sken och verklighet. In C. V. Otter (Ed.), Ute och inne i svenskt arbetsliv : Forskare analyserar och spekulerar om trender i framtidens arbete. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.Google Scholar
  16. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nycander, S. (2002). Makten över arbetsmarknaden: Ett perspektiv på Sveriges 1900-tal. Stockholm: SNS förlag.Google Scholar
  18. Nyström, Ö. (2000). Mellan anpassning och motstånd: Facket och det nya arbetslivet. Stockholm: Atlas.Google Scholar
  19. Robb, G. (1992). White-collar crime in modern England: Financial fraud and business morality 1845–1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Robb, G. (2006). Women and white-collar crime—debates on gender, fraud and the corporate economy in England and America 1850–1930. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1058–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rydin, K. (1888). Om konkursförbrytelser. Upsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  22. Schlegel, K., & Weisburd, D. (1994). White-collar crime reconsidered. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schön, L. (2000). En modern svensk ekonomisk historia : Tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel. Stockholm: SNS förl.Google Scholar
  24. Shapiro, S. (1984). Wayward capitalists: Target of the securities and exchange commission. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White collar crime. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  26. Swenson, P. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, J. (2005). Commercial fraud and public men in Victorian Britain. Historical Research, 78, 230–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson, S. (2006). Law, morality and regulation—victorian experiences of financial crime. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 1073–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations