Critical Criminology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 211–231 | Cite as

Miscarriages of Justice and the Government of the Criminal Justice System: An Alternative Perspective on the Production and Deployment of Counter-Discourse

  • Michael Naughton
Article

Abstract

This article confronts a perennial question raised by critical criminologists, namely, what part do critical counter-discourses play in the exercise of dominant forms of power in the sphere of criminal justice? In specific terms, it analyses some of the key sources of critical socio-legal counter-discourse that were produced and deployed in response to the most recent governmental review of the criminal justice system on the problem of miscarriages of justice in England and Wales. In so doing, it draws from Foucault’s theses on power, resistance and governmentality and suggests an alternative reading of the relations of power and the role and rationality of governmental intervention in the legislative framework of the criminal justice system. In light of this, it is argued that the reform of the criminal justice system should not only or merely be viewed as a ‘damage limitation exercise’ by a repressive state attempting to ‘betray’ the public to retain or reproduce its power. On the contrary, reform of the criminal justice system might, also, fruitfully be seen as part of a process that is initiated when the governmental conditions are right; a process which can, also, present opportunities to achieve progressive reforms.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Justice System Criminal Justice System Dominant Form Specific Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, J., McConville, M. 1980Confessions in Crown Court Trials (Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure – Research study 5)HMSOLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, B.P., Hostettler, J. 1997Hanging in the Balance: A History of the Abolition of Capital Punishment in Britain WinchesterWaterside PressEnglandGoogle Scholar
  3. Boothman, C. 1994Race and Racism – the missing dimension in the Royal Commission on Criminal JusticeMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  4. Box, S. 1983Power, Crime, and MystificationTavistockLondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridges, L. and McConville, M. (1994). Keeping faith with their own convictions: The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. The Modern Law Review 57:1 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  6. Brogden, M. 1994Gatekeeping and the seamless Web of the criminal justice processMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  7. Callaghan, J. 1997ForewordBlock, B.P.Hostettler, J. eds. Hanging in the Balance: A History of the Abolition of Capital Punishment in BritainWinchester. Waterside PressEnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. Cape, E. 1994Defence services: what should defence lawyers do at Police Stations’McConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisAldershotEdward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  9. Capital Punishment – U.K. <http://www.geocities.com/Capital/Hill/6142/> 24 January 2002Google Scholar
  10. Christoph, J.B. 1962Capital Punishment and British Politics: The British Movement to Abolish the Death Penalty GeorgeAllen & Unwin LtdLondon19451957Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, C., Dixon, D., Bottomley, K. 1993Police investigative procedures: researching the impact of PACEWalker, C.Starmer, K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Colvin, M. 1994Miscarriages of justice: the appeal processMcConville, M.Bridges,  L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  13. Criminal Cases Review Commission2000Criminal Cases review Commission Annual Report 1999–2000CCRCBirminghamISBN 1–84082-480-8Google Scholar
  14. Editorial, (2001). Real risk is posed by Tory far right. The Observer August 26Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, H. (1977) Report of an Inquiry by the Honourable Sir Henry Fisher into the circumstances leading to the trial of three persons on charges arising out of the death of Maxwell Confait and the fire at 27 Doggett Road, London SE6, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. 1977Discipline And Punish: The Birth of the PrisonAllen LaneLondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. 1979The History of Sexuality: Volume 1 An IntroductionAllen LaneLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. In C. Gordon (ed.), Brighton: Harvester PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. 1991GovernmentalityBurchell, G.Gordon, C.Miller, P. eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in GovernmentalityHarvester WheatsheafLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. George, A. 1991George, A. eds. The discipline of terrorologyPolity PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon, C. 1991Governmental rationality: an introductionBurchell, G.Gordon,  C.Miller, P. eds. The Foucault Effect: Studies in GovernmentalityUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Greer, S. 1994Miscarriages of criminal justice reconsideredThe Modern Law Review571Google Scholar
  23. Guardian Unlimited (2004). The Stephen Lawrence Case, <http://www.guardian.co.uk/lawrence/>7 January 2004Google Scholar
  24. Hillyard, P. 1994The politics of criminal injustice: the Irish dimension’McConville,  M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillyard, P and Tombs, S. (2001). From crime to social harm? Criminology, Zemiology and Justice. Paper presented at Annual Socio-Legal Studies Association Conference, University of Bristol, 4–6 AprilGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillyard, P., Tombs, S. 2004Beyond criminologyHillyard, P.Pantazis, C.Tombs,  S.Gordon, D. eds. Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm SeriouslyPluto PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Hillyard, P., Watson, S. 1996Postmodern social policy: a contradiction in terms?Journal of Social Policy25321346Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson, J. 1994No defence for the Royal CommissionMcConville, M.Bridges,  L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  29. Home Office2003Department for Constitutional Affairs Judicial StatisticsHMSOLondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoy, D.C. 1998Arac, J. eds. Foucault: modern or postmodern?Rutgers␣University PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunt, A., Wickham, G. 1994Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as GovernancePluto PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Irving, B. and Hilgendorf, L. (1980). Police Interrogation (Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure – Research study; no. 1 & 2) London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  33. Kettle, M. (1979). Trying to make the verdicts fit the evidence. New SocietyGoogle Scholar
  34. Lacey, N. 1994Missing the wood pragmatism versus theory in the Royal CommissionMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  35. Macpherson, W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry by Sir William Macpherson of Cluny London: The Stationary Office: Cm 4262–IGoogle Scholar
  36. Maher, G. 1994Reforming the criminal process: A Scottish perspective’McConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  37. Mansfield, M., Taylor, T. 1993Post-Conviction ProceduresWalker, C.Starmer,  K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Matheisen, T. 1974The Politics of Abolition: Essays in Political Action TheoryMartin RobertsonLondonGoogle Scholar
  39. May, J.D. (1994). The Guildford and Woolwich Inquiry. London: HMSO HC 449Google Scholar
  40. McConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. 1994aCriminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  41. McConville, M., Bridges, L. 1994bForewordMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  42. McElree, F., Starmer, K. 1993The right to silenceWalker, C.Starmer, K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  43. McNay, L. 1994Foucault: A Critical IntroductionPolity PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, W. R. 1979Holdaway,  eds. Police tradition in a changing society workEdward ArnoldLondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Naughton, M. (2001). Wrongful convictions: towards a zemiological analysis of the tradition of criminal justice system reform Radical Statistics Number 76, Winter, 50–65Google Scholar
  46. Naughton, M. (2002). The scales of injustice The Observer July 28Google Scholar
  47. Naughton, M. (2003). How big is the “iceberg”? – a zemiological approach to quantifying miscarriages of justice. Radical Statistics 81, Spring, 5–17Google Scholar
  48. Naughton, M. (2003a). Rethinking Miscarriages of Justice. Unpublished Paper Presented to Centre for Criminal Justice Studies Seminar Programme – Semester One 2003/4, Department of Law, University of Leeds, 25 November 2003Google Scholar
  49. Naughton, M. 2004Reorientating miscarriages of justiceHillyard, P.Pantazis, C.Tombs, S.Gordon, D. eds. Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm SeriouslyPluto PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Nobles, R., Schiff, D 1995Miscarriages of justice: a systems approachThe Modern Law Review583 MayGoogle Scholar
  51. Nobles, R., Schiff, D 1997The never ending story: disguising tragic choices in criminal justiceThe Modern Law Review602 MarchGoogle Scholar
  52. Nobles, R., Schiff, D. 2000Understanding Miscarriages of Justice: Law, the Media, and the Inevitability of CrisisOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Connor, P. 1993Prosecution disclosure: principle, practice and justiceWalker,  C.Starmer, K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Osborne, T. 1996Security and vitality: drains, liberalism and power in the nineteenth centuryBarry, A.Osborne, T.Rose, N. eds. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of governmentUCL PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Osoba, M.M. (1998). Obtaining the views of the people. The Police Journal: A Quarterly Review for the Police of the World Chichester, Sussex: Barry Rose Law Periodicals LtdGoogle Scholar
  56. Pattenden, R. 1996English Criminal Appeals 1884–1994: Appeals against Conviction and Sentence in England and WalesClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. Police and Criminal Evidence Act1984(s.66)HMSOLondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Price, C. 1985Confession evidence, the Police and Criminal Evidence Act and the Confait CaseBaxter, J.Koffman, L. eds. Police: The Constitution and the Community: A Collection of original essays on Issues raised by The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984Professional Books limitedAbingdonGoogle Scholar
  59. Price, C., Caplan, J. 1976The Confait ConfessionsMarion BoyarsLondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Quinney, R. 1973Critique of Legal Order: Crime Control in Capitalist SocietyLittle, Brown and CompanyBostonGoogle Scholar
  61. Quinney, R. 1980Class, State & Crime2nd editionLongmanNew York; LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Rabinow, P. eds. 1984The Foucault Reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thoughtPenguin. PenguinLondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Rose, N. 1996Governing “advanced” liberal democraciesBarry, A.Osborne, T.Rose, N. eds. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of GovernmentUCL PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure1981ReportHMSO CmLondon8092Google Scholar
  65. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice1993ReportHMSO CmLondon2263Google Scholar
  66. Sanders, A., Bridges, L. 1983The right to legal adviceWalker, C.Starmer,  K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Singh, S. 1994Understanding the long-term relationship between the Police and the PolicedMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  68. Smart, B. 1988Michel FoucaultRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, I., Walton, P., Young, J. 1973The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of DevianceRoutledge & Kegan PaulLondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor, I.Walton, P.Young, J. eds. 1975Critical CriminologyRoutledge & Kegan PaulLondonGoogle Scholar
  71. The Law Commission (2001) ‘Double Jeopardy and Prosecution Appeals: Report on two references under section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965’ LAW COM Number 267, Cm 5048Google Scholar
  72. Tombs, S.Whyte, D. eds. 2003Unmasking the Crimes of the Powerful: Scrutinizing States and CorporationsPeter LangNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker, C. 1993IntroductionWalker, C.Starmer, K. eds. Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Walker, C.Starmer, K. eds. 1993Justice in ErrorBlackstone Press LimitedLondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Wells, C. 1994The Royal Commission on criminal justice: a room without a viewMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  76. Winter, J. 1994Criminally unjust: The Royal Commission and Northern IrelandMcConville, M.Bridges, L. eds. Criminal Justice in CrisisEdward ElgarAldershotGoogle Scholar
  77. Woffinden, B. 1987Miscarriages of JusticeHodder & StoughtonLondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolin, S.S. 1988On the Theory and Practice of PowerArac, J. eds. After Foucault: Humanistic Knowledge, Postmodern ChallengesRutgers University PressLondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Naughton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of BristolUK

Personalised recommendations