Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 70, Issue 5, pp 583–602 | Cite as

Policing labor: the power of private security guards to search workers in Brazil

  • Cleber da Silva Lopes
Article

Abstract

The losses caused by worker theft is one of the most concerning security problems for corporations. Private policing of the workplace is central to cutting down on such losses and keeping up profits. One of the most frequently used methods in such policing is searching workers. Despite the importance of searches and their potential for intrusion into individuals’ right to privacy, the normative bases for and limits to the use of this power have so far been little studied. The aim of this paper is to analyze the legal foundations and limits imposed by the Brazilian State so that private security guards can conduct searches in the workplace. The analysis is based on a qualitative study of Brazilian labor law and a qualitative/quantitative study of 376 judicial decisions on searches collected randomly in two Brazilian states between 2010 and 2013. The data shows that searches can be conducted in the workplace based on the employer’s right to manage production and protect their property. It also indicates the existence of relatively flexible limits to searches. Only a minority of the courts impose restrictions on searches similar to those set for police officers. Most judges allow more extensive searches than those permitted within the scope of public justice systems. The consequences of these findings are discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the members of the Laboratory of Studies on Security Governance of the State University of Londrina (Laboratório de Estudos sobre Governança da Segurança da Universidade Estadual de Londrina; LEGS-UEL), especially Fabrício Silva Lima, for their assistance in assembling the database of this research and for the comments made to a preliminary version of this article.

Funding

This research received financial support from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-MCTIC) of Brazil (Grant no. 459514/2014–8).

References

  1. 1.
    Florquin, N. (2011). A booming business: Private security and small arms. In Small arms survey 2011: States of security (pp. 101–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (2001). The new structure of policing: description, conceptualization and research agenda. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gill, M. (2014). The handbook of security (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnston, L. (1992). The rebirth of private policing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Plural policing: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kevin, W., & Lippert, R. K. (2014). Corporate security in the 21st century: Theory and practice in international perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston, L. & Shearing, C. D., (2003). Governing security: explorations of policing and justice. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shearing, C. D., & Stenning, P. C. (1983). Private security: implications for social control. Social Problems, 30(5), 493–506.  https://doi.org/10.2307/800267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    South, N. (1988). Policing for profit: The private security sector/Nigel South. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spitzer, S., & Scull, A. T. (1977). Privatization and capitalist development: the case of the private police. Social Problems, 25(1), 18–29.  https://doi.org/10.2307/800464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood, J., & Dupont, B. (2006). Democracy, society and the governance of security. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck, A. (2014). Understanding loss in the retail sector. In M. Gill (Ed.), The handbook of security (2nd ed., pp. 361–382). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Véry, P., Monnet, B., & Hassid, O. (2010). Enquête EDHEC–CDSE : « Panorama 2008-2009 des crimes commis contre les entreprises ». Sécurité et stratégie, 3(1), 7–13.  https://doi.org/10.3917/sestr.003.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cube, S., & Deyle, E. (2015). Global retail theft barometer. The new barometer. http://www.globalretailtheftbarometer.com/
  15. 15.
    Rigakos, G. S., & Greener, D. R. (2000). Bubbles of governance: private policing and the law in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law & Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, 15(1), 145–185.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0829320100006220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stenning, P. C., & Shearing, C. D. (1979). Search and seizure-powers of private security personnel. Canada: Law Reform Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stenning, P. C. (2000). Powers and accountability of private police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(3), 325–352.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008729129953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Button, M. (2007). Security officers and policing: Powers, culture and control in the governance of private space. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calder, J. D. (1987). New corporate security: The autumn of crime control and the spring of fairness and due process. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 3(4), 1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104398628700300402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gill, M., & Hart, J. (1999). Private security: enforcing corporate security policy using private investigators. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), 245–261.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008761528808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henry, S., Shearing, C. D., & Stenning, P. C. (1987). Private justice and the policing of labour: The dialectics of industrial discipline. In Private policing (Vol. 23, pp. 45–71). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Monkkonen, E. H. (1992). History of urban police. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Modern policing (pp. 547–579). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weiss, R. P. (1986). Private detective agencies and labour discipline in the United States, 1855–1946. The Historical Journal, 29(1), 87–107.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X0001863X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weiss, R. P. (2014). Corporate security at ford motor company: From the great war to the cold war. In K. Walby & R. K. Lippert (Eds.), Corporate security in the 21st century-theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 17–38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shearing, C. D. (1992). The relation between public and private policing. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Modern policing (pp. 399–444). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    French, J. D. (2004). Drowning in laws: Labor law and Brazilian political culture. Chapel: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pinheiro, P. S. (2001). Transição Política e Não-Estado de Direito na República. In I. Sachs & P. S. Pinheiro (Eds.), Brasil: um século de transformações (pp. 265–305). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinheiro, P. S. (2006). O proletariado industrial na Primeira República. In B. Fausto (Ed.), O Brasil republicano, v. 9: sociedade e instituições (1989–1930) (pp. 147–193). Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fausto, B. (2015). História do Brasil (14th ed.). São Paulo: Edusp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cardoso, A. M. (2003). Direito do Trabalho e Relações de Classe no Brasil Contemporâneo. In L. W. Vianna (Ed.), A democracia e os Três Poderes no Brasil (1. reimpr, pp. 493–555). Belo Horizonte ; Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFMG ; IUPERJ/FAPERJ.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cardoso, A. M. (2015). Os sindicatos: representação de interesses e ação política de capital e trabalho no Brasil. In L. Avelar & Cintra (Eds.), Sistema político brasileiro: uma introdução (3rd ed.). Rio de Janeiro São Paulo Editora da UNESP: Fundação Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meerts, C. (2014). Corporate security: Governing throught private and public law. In K. Walby & R. K. Lippert (Eds.), Corporate security in the 21st century-theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 97–115). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shearing, C. D., Stenning, P. C., & Farnell, M. (1980). Contract security in Ontario. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lopes, C. d. S. (2015). Assessing private security accountability: a study of Brazil. Policing and Society, 25(6), 641–662.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.912649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Noronha, E. G. (2000). The legislated model of labor relations in Brazil. Dados, 43(2).  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582000000200002.
  37. 37.
    CNJ-Conselho Nacional de Justiça. (2013). Justiça em Números −2013. Brasília: Conselho Nacional de Justiça. www.cnj.jus.br/images/pesquisas-judiciarias/Publicacoes/jncompleto2012v2.7z
  38. 38.
    Paixão, A. L., & Beato Filho, C. (1997). Crimes, vítimas e policiais. Tempo Social, 9(1), 233–248.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20701997000100013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sarre, R. (2003). Legal sources of private security powers. Canberra Law Review, 7, 109.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesState University of LondrinaLondrinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations