Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 65, Issue 4–5, pp 377–394 | Cite as

The impact of petty corruption on firm innovation in Vietnam

  • Ngoc Anh Nguyen
  • Quang Hung Doan
  • Ngoc Minh Nguyen
  • Binh Tran-Nam


Corruption has been found to have complex effects on firm innovation. Limited theoretical and empirical evidence to date has been rather inconclusive. This study employs econometric estimation techniques to analyze data from small and medium manufacturing enterprises in Vietnam to assess the impact of petty corruption on firm innovation. The empirical results tend to support the “greasing” impact of corruption on innovation. Specifically, informal payments by Vietnamese firms are shown to encourage overall innovation, product improvement, innovation and new innovation. In view of the commonplace business practice of paying small informal fees to speed up transactions in the inefficient public sector in Vietnam, this finding is not entirely unexpected, though troubling.


Process Innovation Product Innovation Foreign Firm Informal Payment Firm Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Lien Nguyen, Edmund Malesky, the conference and symposium organizers and participants, and the guest editors of this special issue for their valuable comments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Financial support

Financial support from the Department for International Development (DFID) Vietnam is also gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of DFID Vietnam or DEPOCEN.


  1. 1.
    Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, H. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahagaonkar, P. (2010). Money and ideas: Four studies on finance, innovation and the business life cycle. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Oslo mannual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3rd edition, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Bank (1997). Helping countries to combat corruption the role of World Bank. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Habiyaremye, A., & Raymond, W. (2013). Transitional corruption and innovation in transition, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series #2013–050. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rose-Ackerman, S. (2002). When is corruption harmful? In Heidenheimer, A.J. & Johnston, N., Political corruption: Concepts & context, 3rd edition, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rose-Ackerman, S. (2003). Corruption. In Rowley, C.K & Schneider, R.D. (eds) The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, Part I, Heidelberg: Springer, 67–76.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen, N. A., Nguyen, N. M., Tran, A. V., & Tran-Nam, B. (2015). Corruption and economic growth. Crime Law Social Change, this issue.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leys, C. (1965). What is the problem about corruption? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 3(2), 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Méon, P.-G., & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kato, A., & Sato, T. (2015). The effects of corruption on the manufacturing sector in India. Economics of Governance, 15(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisman, R., & Svensson, J. (2007). Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3–4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, J. Q., & Peng, M. W. (2011). Does bribery help or hurt firm growth around the world? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 907–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen, Y., Liu, M., & Su, J. (2013). Greasing the wheels of bank lending: Evidence from private firms in China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2533–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vial, V., & Hanoteau, J. (2010). Corruption, manufacturing plant growth and the Asian paradox: Micro-level evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 38(5), 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2004). United Nations convention against corruption. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    OECD (2011). OECD’s convention on combating bribery of foreign public officials in international business transactions and related documents. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Patheon.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Veracierto, M. (2008). Corruption and innovation. Economic Perspectives, 32(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rose-Ackerman, R. (1997). The political economy of corruption. In K. A. Elliott (Ed.), Corruption and the global economy (pp. 31–60). Washington DC: Insittute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bó, E. D., & Rossi, M. A. (2007). Corruption and inefficiency: Theory and evidence from electrical utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5–6), 939–962.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luo, Y. (2004). An organizational perspective on corruption. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kurer, O. (1993). Clientelism, corruption and the allocation of resources. Public Choice, 77(2), 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bailey, D. H. (1966). The effects of corruption in a developing nation. Western Political Quarterly, 19(4), 719–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lien, D.-H. D. (1986). A note on competitive bribery games. Economics Letters, 22(4), 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beck, P. J., & Maher, M. W. (1986). A comparison of bribery and bidding in thin markets. Economics Letters, 20(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope and cures. IMF Working Paper WW/98/63. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S.-J. (2000). Does ‘grease money’ speed up the wheels of commerce? IMF Working Paper WP/00/64. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. A. (1998). Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: A general equilibrium approach. The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1381–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Griffiths, M. D., & Kickul, J. (2008). The socioeconomic determinants of innovation. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9(4), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Golla, J. (2010). How strong is the influence of corruption on innovation, especially in post-communist EU member states? A comparative analysis. University of Twente Student Theses. Access 20 January 2014 at <>.
  42. 42.
    Natário, M., Couto, J., Tiago, T., & Braga, A. (2011). Evaluating the determinants of national innovative capacity among European countries. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(11), 67–78.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(209), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    de Waldemar, F. S. (2012). New products and corruption: Evidence from Indian firms. The Developing Economies, 50(3), 268–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krammer, M.S. (2014). Greasing the wheels of change: The impact of corruption and institutions on firm innovation. Access 2 April 2015 at <>
  46. 46.
    Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2012). Firm-level corruption in Vietnam. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60(3), 571–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Goedhuys, M. (2007). Learning, product innovation, and firm heterogeneity in developing countries: Evidence from Tanzania. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lederman, D. (2010). An international multilevel analysis of product innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 606–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Marius, Sorin and Krammer, Sebastian (2013) “Greasing the wheels of change: the impact of corruption on firms?” Paper presented at the 35th DRUID Celebration Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June. Accessed at: Scholar
  51. 51.
    Krastanova, Peta, (2014) “Greasing the Wheels of Innovation: How Corruption and Informal Practices of Firms Impact the Level of Innovation in Bulgaria,” MA Dissertation, Budapest, Central European University, 2014, Accessed at:
  52. 52.
    Tonoyan, Vartuhi (2003) “The Bright and Dark Sides of Trust: Corruption and Entrepreneurship -A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Emerging vs. Mature Market Economies,” Accessed at:
  53. 53.
    Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina (2015) “Corruption: Good governance powers innovation,” Nature (18 February), Accessed at:
  54. 54.
    Avnimelech, Gil, Yaron Zelekha and Eyal Sarabi (2011) “The Effect of Corruption on Entrepreneurship,” Accessed at:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ngoc Anh Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Quang Hung Doan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ngoc Minh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Binh Tran-Nam
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Development and Policies Research Center (DEPOCEN)HanoiVietnam
  2. 2.IPAG Business SchoolParisFrance
  3. 3.Foreign Trade UnivesityHanoiVietnam
  4. 4.RMIT International UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  5. 5.University of New South Wales AustraliaSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations