Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 64, Issue 2–3, pp 177–192 | Cite as

Seizures of inconvenience? Policy, discretion and accidental discoveries in policing the illegal wildlife trade at the Norwegian border

Article
First Online:

Abstract

The illegal wildlife trade is among the fastest growing categories of transnational crime and is increasingly characterized as a problem by law enforcement authorities internationally and in Norway. This article examines the policing of illegal trade in wildlife at the Norwegian border. Wildlife trade is regulated by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Observations and interviews with Norwegian customs inspectors show that the detection of wildlife is not a priority when inspectors make risk assessments of control objects. I argue that this is largely because the Norwegian Customs and Excise’s organizational strategies and distribution of resources are directed towards other flows of illegal goods at the expense of wildlife. The considerable professional discretion the inspectors are allowed to exercise does not promote the enforcement of CITES. The inspectors see such cases as complicated, time consuming and unrewarding in terms of penalties upon prosecution. Seizures of wildlife are often accidental rather than planned. The findings indicate a need to reinforce and fully implement existing legislation on illegal wildlife trade at both the policy and on-site levels.

Keywords

Organize Crime Illegal Trade Transnational Crime Wildlife Crime Wildlife Trade 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Albrecht, H.-J. (2011). Transnational Organized crime. The German Response. In S. Okubo and L. Shelley (Eds.), Human Security, Transnational Crime and Human Trafficking. Asian and Western Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CITES (2015). What is CITES? Retrieved 19.6.2015 from: http://www.cites.org/eng/disc/what.php.
  3. 3.
    Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning (2010). Handel med truede arter. Sjekkliste for CITES 2010. DN-notat 2–2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eckhoff, T., & Sundby, N. K. (1991). Rettssystemer. Systemteoretisk innføring i rettsfilosofien. 2. Utgave. Oslo: Tano.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holmberg, L. (2003). Policing stereotypes: A qualitative study of police work in Denmark. Glienicke/Berlin: Galda + Wilch Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hörnqvist, M. (2007). The organized nature of power. On productive and repressive interventions based on considerations of risk. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hörnqvist, M. (2006). Risk governance of the Swedish customs service: negotiating security, efficiency and poor information. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology & Crime Prevention, 7(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larsson, P. (2008). Organisert kriminalitet. Oslo: Pax.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Naím, M. (2005). Illicit. How smugglers, traffickers and copycats are hijacking the global economy. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noaks, L., & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological research. Understanding qualitative methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norsk Herpetologisk Forening (2007). Over 100.000 reptiler i Norge. Retrieved 30.1.2014 from: http://www.herpetologisk.com/presse/over-100000-reptiler-i-norge.html.
  14. 14.
    Pickering, S., & Ham, J. (2013). Hot pants at the border. Sorting sex Work from Trafficking. British Journal of Criminology, 54, 2–19.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Politidirektoratet (2010). Tendenser i kriminaliteten. Utfordringer i Norge i 2010–2012. POD publikasjon 2010/05. Oslo: Politidirektoratet.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pratt, A. (2010). Between a hunch and a hard place: making suspicion reasonable at the Canadian border. Social and Legal Studies, 19(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reeve, R. (2002). Policing international trade in endangered species. The CITES treaty and compliance. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen, G. A., & Smith, K. F. (2010). Summarizing the evidence on the international trade in illegal wildlife. EcoHealth, 7(1), 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneider, J. L. (2012). Sold into extinction. The global trade in endangered species. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sollund, R. A. (2013). Animal trafficking and trade: abuse and species injustice. In R. Walters, D. S. Westerhuis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging issues in green criminology. exploring power, justice and harm. Critical criminological Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sollund, R. A. (2011). Expressions of speciesism: the effects of keeping companion animals on animal abuse, animal trafficking and species decline. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(5), 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    South, N., & Wyatt, T. (2011). Comparing illicit trades in wildlife and drugs: an exploratory study. Deviant Behavior, 32(6), 538–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stortingsproposisjon nr. 1 (2011–2012). Proposisjon til Stortinget (forslag til stortingsvedtak). Oslo: Finansdepartementet.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stub, M. (2002). Tollvesenets kontrollvirksomhet: fragmenter fra den materielle tollretten. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Norwegian Directorate of Customs and Excise (2014). Beslagsutvikling 2008–2013. Retrieved 28.8.2014 from http://www.toll.no/templates_TAD/Topic.aspx?id=267360&epslanguage=no.
  27. 27.
    The Norwegian Directorate of Customs and Excise (2010). Strategy plan for Norwegian Customs and Excise. Retrieved 25.01.2014 from http://toll.no/templates_TAD/Article.aspx?id=197069&epslanguage=en.
  28. 28.
    The Norwegian Directorate of Customs and Excise (2009). Kontroll på person. Retrieved 23.1.2014 from http://www.toll.no/templates_TAD/GuideArticle.aspx?id=176589&epslanguage=no.
  29. 29.
    UNODC (2013). Transnational organized crime in east Africa. A threat assessment. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Organized Crime.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    UNODC (2004). The United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. New York: United Nations. Retrieved 20.7.2015 from http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCebook-e.pdf
  31. 31.
    Valverde, M., Levi, R., & Moore, D.(2005). Legal knowledges of risk. In The law Commission of Canada (Ed.), Law and Risk. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wellsmith, M. (2011). Wildlife crime: the problems of enforcement. European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, 17(2), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    White, R. (2013). The conceptual contours of green criminology. In R. Walters, D. S. Westerhuis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging issues in green criminology. Exploring power, justice and harm. Critical criminological perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    White, R. (2011). Transnational environmental crime. Toward an eco-global criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wright, G. (2011). Conceptualizing and combating transnational environmental crime. Trends in Organized Crime, 14(4), 332–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wyatt, T. (2013). Uncovering the significance of and motivation for wildlife trafficking. In N. South, & A. Brisman (Eds.), International handbook of green criminology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wyatt, T. (2013). Wildlife trafficking. A deconstruction of the crime, the victims and the offenders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wyatt, T. (2009). Exploring the organization of Russia far east’s illegal wildlife trade: two case studies of the illegal fur and illegal falcon trades. Global Crime, 10(1–2), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Police University CollegeOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations