Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 64, Issue 4–5, pp 211–228 | Cite as

Policing prostitution in an era of human trafficking enforcement

  • Amy FarrellEmail author
  • Shea Cronin
Article

Abstract

Prostitution and commercialized vice have been variously prioritized as urban crime problems across U.S. history. In response, lawmakers have historically been guided by a prohibititionst view where people selling, buying or facilitating the sale of sex are considered to be immoral and criminal. In recent years, public concern about the trafficking of persons for sex has reframed prostitution and the expectations of government response. The U.S. federal government and all fifty states have passed legislation that is guided by an abolitionist view of prostitution where people who are forced or coerced to sell sex are redefined as victims. State, county and municipal police officers are now receiving training on how to identify human trafficking cases and investigators are being trained to investigate and prepare cases for prosecution. Despite these efforts under the new legal regime, confusion exists about how sex trafficking differs from prostitution and correspondingly necessitates different types of law enforcement responses. Adding to this complication is the fact that in many major cities the responsibility for identifying and eradicating human trafficking has fallen to the same group of investigators who are responsible for enforcing vice and prostitution laws. As a result, prostitution enforcement is expected to change as police increasingly focus on identifying sex trafficking victims. Using data on police arrests for prostitution from 1980 to 2012, we examine the impact of federal and state anti-trafficking legislation on the local enforcement of prostitution. Our findings inform debate about legal reform as a response to urban crime problems and illustrate the complexities of policy implementation and interpretation.

Keywords

Human Trafficking Police Agency Uniform Crime Report Legal Change Trafficking Victim 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, C. (2013). Moving beyond “slaves, sinners and saviors”: an intersectional feminist analysis of US sex trafficking discourse, law and policy. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 4, 1–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bittner, E. (1980). Aspects of police work. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouche, V., and Wittmer, D. (2009). Human trafficking legislation across the states: the determinants of comprehensiveness. First Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Trafficking, Lincoln Nebraska. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005;context=humtraffconf;sei-redir=1;referer=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dhuman%2Btrafficking%2Bacross%2Bthe%2Bstates%2Bbouche%26btnG%3D%26hl%3Den%26as_sdt%3D0%252C22#search=%22human%20trafficking%20across%20states%20bouche%22. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.
  4. 4.
    Burleigh, N. (2014). Super bowl prostitution crackdown: inside the NYPD’s new strategy. Time, January 31.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Center for Women Policy. 2014 U.S. Policy Advocacy to Combat Trafficking, Enacted Legislation. http://www.centerwomenpolicy.org/programs/trafficking/map/lawdetail.cfm?state=FL. Accessed 30 Sept 2014.
  6. 6.
    Chaung, J. A. (2010). Rescuing trafficking from ideological capture: prostitution reform and anti-trafficking law and policy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158, 1655–1728.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crank, J., & Langworthy, R. (1992). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 338–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doezema, J. (2010). Sex slaves and discourse masters: the construction of trafficking. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edelman, L. (1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: the expansion of due process in the American workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farrell, A. (2014). Environmental and institutional influences on police agency responses to human trafficking. Police Quarterly, 17, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell, A., Owens, C., & McDevitt, J. (2014). New laws but few cases: understanding the challenges to the investigation and prosecution of human trafficking cases. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(2), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farrell, A., & Pfeffer, R. (2014). Policing human trafficking cultural blinders and organizational barriers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2010). Where are all the victims? Understanding the determinants of official identification of human trafficking incidents. Criminology and Public Policy, 9(2), 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farrell, A., & Fahy, S. (2009). The problem of human trafficking in the US: public frames and policy responses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gulati, G. J. (2011). News frames and story triggers in the media’s coverage of human trafficking. Human Rights Review, 12, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gusfield, J. R. (1986). Symbolic crusade: status politics and the American temperance movement. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hester, M. A., & Westmoreland, N. (2004). Tacking street prostitution: towards a holistic approach (p. 270). London, UK: Home Office. Home Office Research Study.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hubbard, P. (2006). Out of touch and out of time? The contemporary policing of sex work. In R. Campbell & M. O’Neill (Eds.), Sex work now. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huisman, W., & Kleemans, E. (2014). The challenge of fighting sex trafficking in the legalized prostitution market of the Netherlands. Crime, Law and Society Change, 61, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Katz, C. (2001). Establishment of police gang unit. Examination of organizational and environmental factors. Criminology, 39, 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelling, G. and Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety. The Atlantic Monthly, March.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kempadoo, K. (2005). From moral panic to global justice: changing perspectives on trafficking. In K. Kempadoo, J. Sanghera, & B. Pattanaik (Eds.), Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: new perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights (pp. 7–34). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    King, R. (2007). The context of minority group threat: race, institutions, and complying with hate crime law. Law and Society Review, 41, 189–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maguire, E. (1997). Structural change in large municipal police organizations during the community policing era. Justice Quarterly, 14, 701–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maguire, E. (2003). Organizational structure in American police agencies: context, complexity and control. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marcus, A., Horning, A., Curtis, R., Sanson, J., & Thompson, E. (2014). Conflict and agency among sex workers and pimps: a closer look at domestic minor sex trafficking. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653, 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mastrofski, S., Ritti, R., & Hoffmaster, D. (1987). Organizational determinants of police discretion: the case of drinking and driving. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matthews, R. (2005). Policing prostitution: Ten years on. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 877–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mogulescu, K. (2014). The super bowl and sex trafficking. New York Times, January 31.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Newman, G. (2006). The exploitation of trafficked women (Problem-oriented guides for police problem-specific guides, Vol. 38). Washington DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pearl, J. (1986). The highest paying customers: America’s cities and the costs of prostitution control. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 769–800.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pilon, M. (2014). Jump in prostitution arrests in super bowl week. New York Times, January, 29.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Polaris Project. (2014). 2014 state ratings on human trafficking laws. Washington DC: Polaris Project. http://www.polarisproject.org/storage/2014SRM_pamphlet_download.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1979). Implementation: how great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raphael, J., Reichert, J. A., & Powers, M. (2010). Pimp control and violence: domestic sex trafficking of Chicago women and girls. Women and Criminal Justice, 20, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raymond, J. G. (2004). Prostitution on demand legalizing the buyers as sexual consumers. Violence Against Women, 10(10), 1156–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scott, M., & Dedel, K. (2006). Street prostitution (Problem oriented guides for police problem-specific guide 2nd ed., Vol. 2). Washington DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Snyder, H., and Mulako-Wangota, J. (2014). Arrest data analysis tool (29-Sep-14) at www.bjs.gov. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stolz, B. (2001). Interest groups and the development of the U.S. congress’s response to human trafficking. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stolz, B. (2007). Interpreting the U.S. human trafficking debate through the lens of symbolic politics. Law and Politics, 29, 311–338.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    United States Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2012). Uniform crime reporting program data: national incident-based reporting system. ICPSR35035-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2014-06-03. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35035.v1.
  44. 44.
    Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), Pub. L. No. 106–386, div A, 114 Stat. 1466.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principle-agent models: an expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weidner, R. (2001). ‘I won’t do Manhattan’: the causes and consequences of the decline in street prostitution. El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publisher.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weitzer, R. (1999). Prostitution control in America: rethinking public policy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 32, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weitzer, R. (2010). The movement to criminalize sex work in the United States. Journal of Law and Society, 37, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weitzer, R. (2014). New directions in research on human trafficking. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653, 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    White Slave Traffic (Mann) Act, ch 395, 36 Stat 825, 826 (1910)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhao, J., He, N., & Loverich, N. P. (2003). Community policing: did it change the basic functions of policing in the 1990s? A national follow up study. Justice Quarterly, 20, 697–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Boston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations