Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 235–255 | Cite as

Radicalisation and de-radicalisation of social movements: The comeback of political Islam?

Article

Abstract

Forty years after Mathiesen wrote the ‘politics of abolition’ his work can enhance our understanding about radicalisation and de-radicalisation of social movements and terrorist groups. In ‘the politics of abolition’ Mathiesen explains the mechanism of two social factors that moderate the most contested goals and means of abolitionists groups. Due to these mechanisms, abolitionist movements often split into one rather moderate and one ‘radical’ current. The Islamist movement is an empirical example for the split the model predicts. Jihadism (e.g. al-Qaeda and its affiliated groups) represents the most radical form of contemporary Islamism, while nationalist Islamism (e.g. the Muslim Brotherhood) and non-jihadi fundamentalism (mainstream Salafism) can be considered less radical because these currents either dismissed their abolitionist goals in favour of political integration, or reject terrorist violence as a means to enforce abolitionist goals. The communiqués and public statements of al-Qaeda give insight into the discourse within the Islamist movement. A sample of jihadi media is reviewed in this article as to compare al-Qaeda’s political positions with those of other Islamist movements and organisations.

References

  1. 1.
    Mathiesen, T. (1974). The politics of abolition (Vol. 4, Scandinavian Studies in Criminology). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathiesen, T. (1986). The politics of abolition. Contemporary Crisis, 10(1), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson, J. (1973). Introduction to Social Movements. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Churchill, W. L. (1947). House of Commons speech on Nov. 11, 1947. In T. C. Hansard (Ed.), Parliamentary Debates. House of Commons Official Report (pp. 206–207). London: House of Commons Official Report.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lipton, J. (2007). The war of words between Hamas and al-Qaeda. Policy Watch, (1254), 1–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paz, R. (2011). Jihadists and nationalist Islamists: Al-Qa'ida and Hamas. In B. Fishman & A. Moghadam (Eds.), Fault Lines in Global Jihad (pp. 203–219). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roy, O. (1994). The failure of political Islam (1ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ICG. (2005). Understanding Islamism. In I. C. Group (Ed.), Middle East/North Afirca Report. Cairo/Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer, M. (2003). Coming to Terms: Fundamentalists or Islamists? Middle East Quarterly, 10(2), 65–77.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tibi, B. (2008). Countering ideological terrorism. Defence Against Terrorism Review, 1(1), 101–136.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phares, W. (2007). The war of ideas. Jihadism against democracy. New York, NY: Palgrave macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Felter, J., & Fishman, B. (2008). Iranian Strategy in Iraq. Politics and “Other Means”. Occasional Paper Series. Lincoln Hall West Point, NY: CTC.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kazimi, N. (2008). The caliphate attempted. Current trends in Islamist Ideology, 7(1), 5–49.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roy, O. (2004). Globalised Islam. The search for a new umma. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiktorowicz, Q. (2006). Anatomy of the Salafi movement. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(3), 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hegghammer, T., & Stéphan, L. (2007). Rejectionist Islamism in Saudi Arabia: The story of Juhayman al-’Utabi revisited. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 39(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Atawneh, M. (2009). Is Saudi Arabia a Theocracy? Religion and Governance in Contemporary Saudi Arabia. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5), 721–737. doi:10.1080/00263200802586105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armborst, A. (2013). Jihadi violence. A study of al-Qaeda's media. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scheuer, M. (2004). Imperial Hubris. Why the West is losing the war on terror (1st ed.). Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Al-Rasheed, M. (2008). The local & the global in Saudi Salafism. ISIM Review(21), 8–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Armborst, A. (2010). Modelling terrorism and political violence. International Relations, 24(4), 414–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations