Crime, Law and Social Change

, 56:133 | Cite as

Illicit deals in cultural objects as crimes of the powerful

  • Simon MackenzieEmail author


Research with dealers at the market end of the global chain of supply of cultural objects leads to the suggestion that the analytical framework associated with the concept of ‘crimes of the powerful’ can be useful in helping us to understand the role of dealers in driving the market, and in focussing our attention on the difficulties of engaging with the illicit trade through a conventional criminal justice approach. This paper explores the nature of the power that is associated with high-level antiquities dealers, and considers its regulatory implications.


Credit Default Swap Source Country Corporate Crime Cultural Object Transnational Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    ADA. (2001). Directory 2001/02. London: Antiquities Dealers Association.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alder, C., & Polk, K. (2002). Stopping this awful business: the illicit traffic in antiquities examined as a criminal market. Art Antiquity and Law, 7, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atwood, R. (2004). Stealing history: Tomb raiders, smugglers, and the looting of the ancient world. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bator, P. M. (1982). An essay on the international trade in art. Stanford Law Review, 34, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bator, P. M. (1983). The international trade in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benson, M. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23(4), 583–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27, 1–35.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowman, B. A. (2008). Transnational crimes against culture: looting at archaeological sites and the ‘Grey’ market in antiquities. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(3), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Box, S. (1983). Power, crime, and mystification. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braithwaite, J. (2009). Restorative justice for banks through negative licensing. British Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brodie, N (2008) The Market in Iraqi Antiquities 1980–2008 Stanford University Archaeology Center website at (version current at 12 January 2010).
  16. 16.
    Burris, S. (2008). Regulatory innovation in the governance of human subjects research: A cautionary tale and some modest proposals. Regulation & Governance, 2, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calhoun, C., & Hiller, H. (1988). Asbestos Exposure by Johns-Manville: Cover-ups, Litigation, Bankruptcy and Compensation. Social Problems, 35, 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cavender, G., Jurik, N. C., & Cohen, A. K. (1993). The baffling case of the smoking gun: the social ecology of political accounts in the Iran-contra affair. Social Problems, 40, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chappell, D., & Polk, K. (2009). Unraveling the 'Cordata': Just How Organised is the International Traffic in Cultural Objects? Basel Institute of Governance website at (version current at 11 August 2010).
  20. 20.
    Chippindale, C., & Gill, D. J. W. (2000). Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting. American Journal of Archaeology, 104, 463–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coggins, C. (1969). Illicit Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities. Art Journal, vol Fall, pp 94–98.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coggins, C. (1970). The Maya Scandal: How Thieves Strip Sites of Past Cultures. Smithsonian. vol October, pp 8–16.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coggins, C. (1971). An art historian speaks out', Auction, vol January, p 33.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Conklin, J. E. (1994). Art crime. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ede, J. (1998). Ethics, the antiquities trade, and archaeology. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Elia, R. J. (1993). A seductive and troubling work: Review of The Cycladic Spirit: Masterpieces from the Nicholas P Goulandris Collection by Colin Renfrew. Archaeology, 46(1), 64–69.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Errington, S. (1998). Death of authentic primitive art: And other tales of progress. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organiszations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Felson, M. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (Vol. 4). NY: Crime Prevention Studies, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedrichs, D. O. (2010). Trusted criminals: White collar crime in contemporary society. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gerstenblith, P. (1995). Identity and Cultural property: the protection of cultural property in the United States. Boston University Law Review, 75, 559.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gerstenblith, P. (2006). From bamiyan to baghdad: warfare and the preservation of cultural heritage at the beginning of the 21st century. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 37, 245–351.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gerstenblith, P. (2007). Controlling the international market in antiquities: reducing the harm, preserving the past. Chicago Journal of International Law, 8(1), 167–195.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gill, D. J. W., & Chippindale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 97(3), 602–673.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Anchor.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J. (1990). Conscience, significant others and rational choice: extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review, 24, 837–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gunningham, N., Kagan, R., & Thornton, D. (2003). Shades of green: Business, regulation and environment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Haines, F. (1997). Corporate regulation: Beyond punish or persuade. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hancher, L., & Moran, M. (1989). Organizing Regulatory Space. In L. Hancher & M. Moran (Eds.), Capitalism, culture and economic regulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harvey, M. (2000). The island of lost maps: A true story of cartographic crime. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hollowell, J. (2006). St Lawrence islands legal market in archaeological goods. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. W. Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, cultural heritage and the antiquities trade. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    ICOM. (2006). Code of ethics for Museums. Paris: International Council of Museums.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jesilow, P., Pontell, H. N., & Geis, G. (1993). Prescription for profit: How doctors defraud medicaid. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaye, L. M., & Main, C. T. (1995). The saga of the Lydian Hoard: From Ushak to New York and back again. In K. W. Tubb (Ed.), Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues. London: Archetype.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kenyon, A. T., & Mackenzie, S. (2002). Recovering stolen art: Australian, English and US law on limitations of action. University of Western Australia Law Review, 30(2), 233–250.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kersel, M. M. (2006). From the ground to the buyer: A market analysis of the trade in illegal antiquities. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. Walker Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, cultural heritage and the antiquities trade. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lacey, N. (2004). Criminalization as regulation: The role of criminal law. In J. Braithwaite, N. Lacey, C. Parker, & C. Scott (Eds.), Regulating law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee, M. T. (1998). The Ford Pinto Case and the Development of Auto Safety Regulations, 1893–1978. Business and Economic History. 27, no Winter, 2.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lorenzi, M. (2006). Power: a radical view, by Steven Lukes. Crossroads, 6(2), 87–95.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mackenzie, S. (2002). Illicit antiquities, criminological theory and the deterrent power of criminal sanctions for targeted populations. Art Antiquity and Law, 7(2), 125–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mackenzie, S. (2002b). Regulating the market in illicit antiquities, trends & issues in crime and criminal justice No. 239. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mackenzie, S. (2005). Dig a bit deeper: law, regulation and the illicit antiquities market. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mackenzie, S. (2005). Going, going, gone: Regulating the market in illicit antiquities. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mackenzie, S. (2006). Psychosocial balance sheets: illicit purchase decisions in the antiquities market. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 18(2).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mackenzie, S. (2007). Transnational crime, local denial. Social Justice, 34(2), 111–124.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mackenzie, S. (2009a). Identifying and preventing opportunities for organized crime in the international antiquities market. In S. Manacorda (Ed.), Organized crime in art and antiquities. Milan: International Scientific and Professional Advisory Council of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mackenzie, S. (2009b). Protection against trafficking in cultural property. UNODC/CCPCJ/EG.1/2009/CRP.1, UNODC, Vienna.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mackenzie, S., & Green, P. (2008). Performative regulation: A case study in how powerful people avoid criminal labels. British Journal of Criminology, 48(2), 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mackenzie, S., & Green, P. (2009). Criminalising the market in illicit antiquities: An evaluation of the dealing in cultural objects (Offences) Act 2003 in England and Wales. In S. Mackenzie & P. Green (Eds.), Criminology and archaeology: Studies in looted antiquities. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mackenzie, S., & Green, P. (Eds.). (2009). Criminology and archaeology: Studies in looted antiquities. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Manacorda, S. (Ed.). (2009). Organized crime in art and antiquities. Milan: International Scientific and Professional Advisory Council of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Marks, P. (1998). The ethics of art dealing. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7(1), 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Matsuda, D. (1998). The ethics of archaeology, subsistence digging, and artifact looting in latin america: point, muted counterpoint. International Journal of Cultural Property, 7, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    McBarnet, D. (2003). When compliance is not the solution but the problem: From changes in law to changes in attitude. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Merryman, J. H. (1986). Two ways of thinking about cultural property. American Journal of International Law, 80, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Merryman, J. H. (1988). The retention of cultural property. University of California Davis Law Review, 21, 477.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Merryman, J. H. (2000). A licit international trade in cultural objects (originally published in (1995) International Journal of Cultural Property, 4, pp. 13)', in Merryman, JH (ed.) Thinking About the Elgin Marbles: Critical Essays on Cultural Property, Art and Law, Kluwer Law International, London.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Murphy, J. D. (1995). Plunder and preservation: Cultural property law and practice in the People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Nielsen, V. L., & Parker, C. (2009). Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement. Regulation & Governance, 3(4), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    O'Keefe, P. J. (1997). Trade in antiquities: Reducing destruction and theft. London: Archetype.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Palmer, N. (1994). Recovering stolen art. Current Legal Problems, 47, 215–254.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Palmer, N., Addyman, P., Anderson, R., Browne, A., Somers Cocks, A., Davies, M., et al. (2000). Ministerial advisory panel on illicit trade, December 2000. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Passas, N. (2005). Lawful but awful: legal corporate crimes. The Journal of Socio-economics, 34, 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Passas, N., & Goodwin, N. R. (Eds.). (2004). It’s Legal but it Ain’t Right: Harmful social consequences of legal industries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Pearce, F. (1976). Crimes of the powerful. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Piquero, N. L., Tibbets, S. G., & Blankenship, M. (2005). Examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime. Deviant Behavior, 26, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Polk, K. (2000). The antiquities trade viewed as a criminal market. Hong Kong Lawyer, vol September, pp 82–92.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Polk, K. (2002). Controlling the traffic in illicit antiquities: are criminal sanctions appropriate? Published as proceedings of the conference Implementation of the UNESCO 1970 Convention, Institute of Art & Law and Art-Law Centre, Geneva, Department for Culture Media and Sport, London.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Price, S. (2002). Primitive art in civilized places. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Prott, L. V., & O'Keefe, P. J. (1984). Law and the cultural heritage, volume 1: Discovery and excavation. Abingdon: Professional Books.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Prott, L. V., & O'Keefe, P. J. (1989). Law and the cultural heritage, volume 3: Movement. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Proulx, B. B. (2010). Organized criminal involvement in the illicit antiquities trade. Trends in Organized Crime, p Published online ahead of print version at time of writing.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Quinney, R. (1978). 'Crimes of the powerful: Marxism. Crime and Deviance', Critical Sociology, 8, 83–84.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Redmond-Cooper, R. (2000). Limitation of actions in art and antiquity claims: part II. Art Antiquity and Law, 5(2), 185–206.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Rees, J. (1997). Development of communitarian regulation in the chemical industry. Law & Policy, 19, 477–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Renfrew, C. (1993). Collectors are the real looters. Archaeology, 46(3), 16–17.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Renfrew, C. (1999). Loot, legitimacy and ownership: The ethical crisis in archaeology. Amsterdam: Joh. Enschede.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Roosevelt, C. H., & Luke, C. (2006). Looting Lydia: The destruction of an archaeological landscape in Western Turkey. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. Walker Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, Cultural heritage and the antiquities trade. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ruggiero, V. (2007). It’s the Economy, stupid! Classifying power crimes. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 35, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ruiz, C. (2001). My Life as a Tombarolo. The Art Newspaper. 112, March pp 36–8 (London).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Scholz, J. (1997). Enforcement policy and corporate misconduct: the changing perspectives of deterrence theory. Law & Contemporary Problems, 60, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Shover, N., & Hochstetler, A. (2006). Choosing white-collar crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Simpson, S. S. (2002). Corporate crime, law and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Steiner, C. (1994). African art in transit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralisation: a theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tijhuis, A. J. G. (2006). Transnational crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors: The case of the illicit art and antiquities trade. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Safety crimes. Cullompton: WIllan.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. (2009). Recommendations of the expert group on protection against trafficking in cultural property. Doc. E/CN.15/2010/5 in thematic discussion on protection against illicit trafficking in cultural property, UN Economic and Social Council, Vienna.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    UNESCO (1970) Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property,Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    UNESCO. (1999). International code of ethics for dealers in cultural property UNESCO website at (version current at 19 June 2003).
  110. 110.
    UNIDROIT. (1995). Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Vrdoljak, A. F. (2006). International law, museums, and the return of cultural objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Watson, P. (1997). Sotheby’s: the inside story. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Watson, P., & Todeschini, C. (2006). The medici conspiracy: The illicit journey of looted antiquities––from Italy’s Tomb raiders to the world’s greatest museums. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Whyte, D. (2009). Crimes of the powerful: A reader. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wilson, D. (2000). Undercover in antiquities. Culture Without Context: the Newsletter of the Illicit Antiquities Research Centre, University of Cambridge, vol Iss. 6.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Zerubavel, E. (2006). The elephant in the room: Silence and denial in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice ResearchUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations