Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 321–336 | Cite as

Deprogramming: from private self-help to governmental organized repression

  • James T. Richardson
Article

Abstract

This paper examines deprogramming, a multi-faceted form of derecruitment from unpopular religious groups (“cults”) developed in the United States and then spreading to other nations, as a form of social control of new religious movements. The early history of deprogramming in the United States is discussed, and then its more recent application in Japan against members of the Unification Church is detailed. A continuum is presented that has self-help remedies at one end, and governmental repression at the other. Self-help forms of deprogramming are illustrated mainly by the United States which has First Amendment protections for religious groups which afford some protection from governmental intervention. Governmental forced derecruitment is illustrated by China’s effort to stamp out the Falun Gong through a very systematic official governmental program involving many institutions operating with full support of the government and the Chinese Communist Party. In between these extremes are cases such as Japan’s social control efforts, and some within the United States, where governmental officials and agencies turn a “blind eye” to self-help remedies, allowing them to operate, or even engage in covert activities to suppress unpopular religious groups.

Keywords

Social Control Religious Group Chinese Communist Party Religious Freedom Religious Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Amnesty International (2000). “People’s Republic of China: The Crackdown on Falun Gong and Other So-Called ‘Heretical Organizations,’” 23 March, available at <http://www.amnesty.ca/library/asa171100.htm>.
  2. 2.
    Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In T. Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In Gods we trust (pp. 295–344). New Brunswock: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black, D. (1999). The social structure of right and wrong. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boothby, L. (2003). White paper report and call to action to uphold the right to thought and conscience by ending forcible deprogramming. Unpublished paper available from author.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bromley, D. (1983). Conservatorships and deprogramming: Legal and political prospects. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 267–293). New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bromley, D. (1988). Deprogramming as a mode of exit from new religious movements: The case of the Unificationist movement. In D. Bromley (Ed.), Falling from the faith (pp. 185–204). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bromley, D., & Richardson, J. T. (1983). The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy: sociological, psychological, legal, and historical perspectives. New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bromley, D., & Shupe, A. (1979). “Moonies” in America: cult, church, and crusade. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies, A. C. (1991). The kidnap ministry: Deprogrammings in Japan and America: A comparative study. Unpublished thesis. Unification Theological Seminary. Barrytown, NY.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dillon, J., & Richardson, J. (1994). The “cult” concept: a politics of representation analysis. SYZYGY: Journal of Alternative Religion and Culture, 3, 185–198.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dawson, L. (2010). The study of new religious movements and the radicalization of home grown terrorists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eckholm, E., Rosenthal, E. (2001). China’s leadership pushed for unity. New York Times, 9 March.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Human Rights Without Frontiers (2010). Japan: Kidnapping, confinement, and forced conversion. Available at: international.secretariat.brussels@hrwf.net.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, I. (1999). China’s crackdown feeds Falun Dafa’s defiance. Wall Street Journal, 29 October.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    LeMoult, J. (1983). Deprogramming members of religious sects. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 234–257). New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marx, G. (1979). External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements. In S. Buechler & K. Cylke (Eds.), Social movements: Perspectives and issues (pp. 360–384). Mountain View: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marshall, T., & Kuhn, A. (2002). Testimony of Michael K. Young before the House Committee on International Relations Sub-committee on International Operations and Human Rights.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mickler, M. (1994). The anti-cult movement in Japan. In A. Shupe & D. Bromley (Eds.), Anti-cult movement in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 275–284). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nagasaka, S. (2009). Forced deprogrammings in Japan over last four decades. Available at http://www.religiousfreedom.com/PDF/Japan/Goto/6.%20History%20of%20Religious%20Kidnapping.pdf
  20. 20.
    Olsen, T., & Richardson, J. T. (2004). The confluence of research traditions on terrorism and religion: a social psychological examination. Psicologia Politica, 34, 39–55.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richardson, J. T. (1991). Cult/brainwashing cases and freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State, 33, 55–74.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richardson, J. T. (1992). Mental health of cult consumers: A legal and scientific controversy. In J. Schumacher (Ed.), Religion and mental health (pp. 233–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Richardson, J. T. (1993). Definitions of cult: from socio-technical to popular-negative. Review of Religious Research, 34, 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richardson, J. T. (1993). A social psychological critique of ‘brainwashing’ claims about recruitment to new religions. In J. Hadden & D. Bromley (Eds.), Handbook of cults and sects in America. Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richardson, J. T. (1999). Social control of new religions: From “brainwashing” claims to child sex abuse accusations. In S. Palmer & C. Hardman (Eds.), Children in new religions (pp. 172–186). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richardson, J. T. (2004). Regulating religion: Case studies from around the globe. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richardson, J. T. (2008). Identity theories, religious groups, and legal social control in Central and Eastern Europe, presented at conference sponsored by the International Study of Religion in Eastern and Central Europe, Cracow, Poland, Dec. 2008, forthcoming in volume of conference papers edited by Irena Borovik. Nomos Publishing: Cracow.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richardson, J. T., & Edelman, B. (2010). State Fostered Violence against the Falun Gong in China, forthcoming in James Lewis, Minority Religion and Violence, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richardson, J. T., van der Lans, J., & Derks, F. (1986). Leaving and labeling: Voluntary and coerced disaffiliation from religious social movements. In K. Land & G. Lang (Eds.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (pp. 97–126). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Richardson, J. T., & Stewart, M. W. (2004). Medicalization and regulation of deviant religions: An application of Conrad and Schneider’s model. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion: Case studies from around the globe (pp. 507–534). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shepherd, W. (1983). Constitutional law and marginal religions. In D. Bromley & J. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 258–266). New York: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shterin, M., & Richardson, J. T. (2000). Effects of the Western anti-cult movement on development of laws concerning religion in post-communist Russia. Journal of Church and State, 42, 247–272.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1980). The new vigilantes: Anti-cultists and the new religions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1994). Anti-cultism in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tong, J. (2009). Revenge of the forbidden city: The suppression of the Falungong in China, 1999–2005. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright, S. (1987). Leaving cults: The dynamics of defection. Washington, D.C.: Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wright, S. (1995). Armageddon in Waco. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wright, S., & Richardson, J. T. (2011). Saints under Siege. New York: New York University Press. The Texas State Raid on the Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints. New York: New York University Pccress.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Judicial Studies Program, Grant Sawyer Center for Justice Studies, Mail Stop 311University of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations