Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 33–51 | Cite as

Devastation in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as a state crime: social audience reactions



In the 5 years since Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast, scholars in many disciplines have speculated on the sources of the widespread devastation. While many of these studies have focused on objective evidence of the violation of human rights following Hurricane Katrina, this study reviews the human rights violations and goes a step further by examining social audience reactions (both victims and the general public) to the government’s response efforts. Relying on Green and Ward’s (Green 2009; Green and Ward Social Justice, 27, 101–115, 2000; 2004) human rights/organizational deviance definition, which sees state crime as human rights violations that result from state organizational deviance, we attempt to provide further evidence of this case as one of state crime. This article presents results from binary logistic regression analyses that assess the likelihood of respondents disapproving of the actions of officials from various levels of government after the hurricane using data from a survey of Hurricane Katrina evacuees completed by The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University (The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University 2005) in the weeks after the storm, and data from a special topics ABC News/Washington Post public opinion survey completed in September of 2005 (ABC News/The Washington Post 2006). Key findings in this study include a strong similarity of results across data sets for race, sex, and religion with regards to respondents disapproving responses to the storm devastation at the federal level. A clear majority of respondents in both data sets disapproved of the actions of some level of government, further implying negative audience reactions, and thus the need to recognize the government’s response to Hurricane Katrina as a state crime.



We would like to thank the Kercher Endowment at Western Michigan University for providing funds to purchase the Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University data set. This article benefited considerably from the thoughtful comments and guidance of David Kauzlarich and an anonymous reviewer. Any remaining flaws are, of course, our responsibility. Earlier versions of this research were presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology (St. Louis, November 2008) and the Society for the Study of Social Problems (San Francisco, August 2009).


  1. 1.
    ABC News/The Washington Post (2006). ABC News/Washington Post Hurricane Katrina Poll, September 2005 [Computer file]. ICPSR04519-v1. Horsham, PA: Taylor Nelson Sofres Intersearch [producer], 2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2007-03-08. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR04519.
  2. 2.
    ABC News (2009). Katrina blame case could bring billions in lawsuits. ( Accessed 7 August 2010.
  3. 3.
    Abney, G. F., & Hill, L. B. (1966). Natural disasters as a political variable: the effect of a hurricane on an urban election. The American Political Science Review, 60(4), 974–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allison, P. D. (2007). SAS macro COMBCHI, version 2.1. Available at
  7. 7. (2005). Bush insists help is on the way. ( Accessed 2 November 2005.
  8. 8.
    Davis, T. (2006). A failure of initiative: The final report of the select bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to hurricane Katrina. ( Accessed 21 April 2006.
  9. 9.
    Davis, H. (2007). Taking crime seriously? Disaster, victimization and justice. In A. Barton, K. Corteen, D. Scott, & D. Whyte (Eds.), Expanding the criminological imagination: Critical readings in criminology (pp. 136–167). Collompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dawson, M., Harris-Lacewell, M., & Cohen, C. (2006). 2005 racial attitudes and the Katrina disaster study. Chicago: University of Chicago, Center for the Study of Race Politics and Culture. ( Accessed 30 July 2009.
  11. 11.
    Dyson, M. E. (2006). Come hell or high water: Hurricane Katrina and the color of disaster. New York: Basic Civitas Books.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faust, K., & Kauzlarich, D. (2008). Hurricane Katrina victimization as a state crime of omission. Critical Criminology, 16(2), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giroux, H. A. (2006). Reading Hurricane Katrina: race, class and the biopolitics of disposability. College Literature, 33(3), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Green, P. (2009). Women and natural disasters. In M. Cain & A. Howe (Eds.), Women, crime and social harm (pp. 161–177). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green, P., & Ward, T. (2000). State crime, human rights, and the limits of criminology. Social Justice, 27, 101–115.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green, P., & Ward, T. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greene, L. S. (2009). Government liability for the Katrina failure. In J. I. Levitt & M. C. Whitaker (Eds.), Hurricane Katrina: America’s unnatural disaster (pp. 206–225). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris-Lacewell, M. (2007). Do you know what it means... mapping emotion in the aftermath of Katrina. Souls, 9(1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huddy, L., & Feldman, S. (2006). Worlds apart: blacks and whites react to Hurricane Katrina. Du Bois Review, 3(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kauzlarich, D., Mullins, C., & Matthews, R. (2003). A complicity continuum of state crime. Contemporary Justice Review, 6, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals (2006). Reports of missing and deceased. ( Accessed 9 June 2010.
  22. 22.
    Michalowski, R. (2010). In search of ‘state and crime’ in state crime studies. In W. Chambliss, R. Michalowski, & R. C. Kramer (Eds.), State crime in the global age (pp. 13–30). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Prison Project of the American Civil Liberties Union (2007). Abandoned and abused: prisoners in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Race and Class, 49(1), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. (1970). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? Issues in Criminology, 5, 123–57.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharkey, P. (2007). Survival and death in New Orleans: an empirical look at the human impact of Katrina. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 482–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Susman, P., O’Keefe, P., & Wisner, B. (1983). Global disasters: A radical interpretation. In K. Hewitt (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology (pp. 263–83). Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University (2005). Survey of hurricane Katrina evacuees. Washington: The Henry Kaiser Family Foundation. ( Accessed 28 November 2009.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    United States Army Corps of Engineers (2006). Performance evaluation of the New Orleans and southeast Louisiana hurricane protection system. ( Accessed 9 June 2010.
  31. 31.
    Van Heerden, I. L., & Bryan, M. (2006). The storm: What went wrong and why during Hurricane Katrina: The inside story from one Louisiana scientist. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations