Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 159–181 | Cite as

Citizenship status and arrest patterns in the United States: evidence from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program

  • Augustine Joseph Kposowa
  • Michelle A. Adams
  • Glenn T. Tsunokai
Article

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate associations between citizenship status and arrest for crimes among male arrestees. The primary hypothesis was that citizenship status (a rough proxy for immigration) has significant effects on arrest for violent personal crimes, property crimes, and four other selected offenses. Data were derived from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program for the years 2000 through 2002 inclusive. Our sample comprised male arrestees only. Logistic regression models were fitted to the data to estimate the citizenship status-crime relationship. Results showed no significant association between citizenship status and arrest for violent crimes. Non-citizens were 15% less likely than citizens to be arrested for property crimes; they were also less likely to be arrested for weapons offenses and drug offenses. Non-citizens were much less likely to test positive on NIDA-5 drugs than citizens. Non-citizens were, however, 50% more likely than citizens to be arrested for forgery/counterfeiting. It was concluded that public perceptions about the relationship of citizenship status to criminal behavior may be exaggerated and may not be borne out by empirical evidence. Limitations of the study are pointed out, including the fact that in the ADAM data, naturalized immigrants are lumped together with native born citizens.

References

  1. 1.
    Agozino, B. (2000). Theorizing otherness, the war on drugs and incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. (2007). Fear in the illegal immigration debate: where do anxious citizens get news? Chicago: Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association. April.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batta, I. D., Mawby, R. I., & McCulloch, J. W. (1981). Crime, social problems and asian immigration: the Bradford experience. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 18, 135–168.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bernburg, J. G., & Thorlindsson, T. (2007). Community structure and adolescent delinquency in Iceland: a contextual analysis. Criminology, 45, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertrand, E., Blachman, M., Sharpe, K., & Andreas, P. (1996). Drug war politics: The price of denial. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brimelow, P. (1995). Alien nation: Commonsense about America’s immigration disaster. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, B., & Benedict, W. R. (2004). Bullets, blades, and being afraid in Hispanic high schools: an exploratory study of the presence of weapons and fear of weapons-associated victimization among high school students in a border town. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 372–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruinsma, G., & Bernasco, W. (2004). Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets. Crime, Law & Social Change, 41, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Busey, S. S. (1969). Immigration: Its evils and consequences. New York: Arno Press and the New York Times.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Butcher, K. F., & Piehl, A. H. (1998). Cross-city evidence on the relationship between immigration and crime. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, N. (2002). Silencing dissent: How post-September 11 anti-terrorism measures threaten our civil liberties. New York: Seven Stories.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan, W. (2005). Crime, deportation and the regulation of immigrants in Canada. Crime, Law & Social Change, 44, 153–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. London: Macgibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cole, D. (2003). Enemy aliens: Double standards and constitutional freedoms in the war on terrorism. New York: New.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coutin, S. B. (2005). Contesting criminality: illegal immigration and the spatialization of legality. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Curry, D. G., & Spergel, I. A. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Damphousse, K. R. (2001). Start spreading the news: understanding the drug problem in the mid-American states with the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 29, 45–64.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Genova, N. (2007). The production of culprits: from deportability to detainability in the aftermath of homeland security. Citizenship Studies, 11, 421–448.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunn, T. J. (2001). Border militarization via drug and immigration enforcement: human rights implications. Social Justice, 28, 7–29.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Crime in the United States 2003. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glassner, B. (2000). The culture of fear. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1998). Immigration and crime in the United States. In J. P. Smith & B. Edmonston (Eds.), The immigration debate: Studies on the economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration (pp. 367–387). Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hourwich, I. A. (1912). Immigration and crime. American Journal of Sociology, 17, 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heyman, J. (1999). United States surveillance over Mexican lives at the border: snapshots of an emerging regime. Human Organization, 58, 430–438.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2002). Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, Technical Documentation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones, M. A. (1992). American immigration (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kane, R., & Yacoubian, G. (1999). Patterns of drug escalation among Philadelphia arrestees: an assessment of the gateway theory. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 107–120.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kennedy, L. W., & Baron, S. W. (1993). Routine activities and a subculture of violence: a study of violence on the street. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klein, M. W., Maxson, C. L., & Cunningham, L. C. (1991). Crack, street gangs and violence. Criminology, 29, 623–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kposowa, A. J. (1998a). The impact of immigration on the United States economy. Lanham: University Press of American.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kposowa, A. J. (1998b). The effect of occupation and industry on homicide victimization in the United States. Homicide Studies, 3, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    LaFree, G. (1999). Declining violent crime rates in the 1990s: predicting crime booms and busts. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Larsen, L. (2004). The foreign born population in the United States: 2003. Washington: Current Population Reports, P20-551, U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee, M. T., Martinez, R., & Rosenfeld, J. (2001). Does immigration increase homicide? Negative evidence from three border cities. The Sociological Quarterly, 42, 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lopez, D. A., & Brummett, P. O. (2003). Gang membership and acculturation: ARSMA-II and choloization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maier-Katkin, D., Stemmler, S., & Stretesky, P. (1995). Immigration and the emergence of right-wing violence in unified Germany. Crime Law & Social Change, 24, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin, S. E., Maxwell, C. E., White, H. R., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Trends in alcohol use, cocaine use, and crime: 1989–1998. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 333–359.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Martinez, R. (2006). Coming to America: the impact of the new immigration on crime. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 1–19). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Martinez, R., & Lee, M. T. (2000). On immigration and crime. In G. LaFree (Ed.), The nature of crime: Continuity and change, vol. 2 of Criminal Justice 2000. Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Martinez, R., & Valenzuela, A. (eds). (2006). Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Martinez, R., Lee, M. T., & Nielsen, A. L. (2004). Segmented assimilation, local context, and determinants of drug violence in Miami and San Diego. Does ethnicity and immigration matter? International Migration Review, 38, 131–157.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    McGuire, S. (2007). Fractured migrant families. Family & Community Health, 30, 178–188.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morao, K. (2006). Domestic violence and the state. Georgetown Journal of Gender & the Law, 7, 787–817.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Myrstol, B. (2003). Drug use trends among Anchorage arrestees: 1999–2001. Alaska Justice Forum, 19, 1–12.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Murphey, D. D. (1994). The world population explosion and the cost of uncontrolled immigration. Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies, 19, 481–510.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Crime and the foreign born. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Preston, J. (2008). U.S. to Speed Deportation of Criminals in Jail. New York Times On-Line http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/us/15immig.html?ref=washington. January 15.
  49. 49.
    Progrebin, M. R., & Poole, E. D. (1989). South Korean immigrants and crime: a case study. The Journal of Politics, 1, 47–79.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Reckless, W., & Smith, H. (1932). Juvenile delinquency. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Reid, S. T. (2006). Crime and criminology (11th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reid, L. W., Weiss, H., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2005). The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across US metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 34, 757–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Romero, M. (2006). Racial profiling and immigration law enforcement: rounding up of usual suspects in the Latino community. Critical Sociology, 32, 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rumbault, R. G., Gonzales, R. G., Komaie, G., Morgan, C. V., & Tafoya-Estrada, R. (2006). Immigration and incarceration: patterns and predictors of imprisonment among first- and second-generation young adults. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 64–89). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Samuels, J. (2000). 1999 Annual report on drug use among adult and juvenile arrestees. Washington: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas (Rev Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Singh, G. K., & Kposowa, A. J. (1996). Occupation-specific earnings attainment of Asian Indians and Whites in the United States: gender and nativity differentials across class strata. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 4, 137–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Smith, J. P., & Edmonston, B. (1997). The new Americans: Economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stofflet, E. H. (1941). The European immigrant and his children. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 217, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1924). Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1934). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1960). Principles of criminology (6th ed.). New York: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Principles of criminology (10th ed.). New York: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tanton, J., & Lutton, W. (1993). Immigration and criminality in the U.S.A. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 18, 217–235.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tanton, J., & Lutton, W. (1994). The immigration invasion. Petoskey: The Social Contract.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Taylor, P. (1971). The distant magnet. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tsunokai, G., & Kposowa, A. (2002). Asian gangs in the United States: the current state of the research literature. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tsunokai, G., & Kposowa, A. (2009). Explaining gang involvement and delinquency among Asian Americans: an empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Gang Research, 16, 1–33.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005). Profile of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Current Population Reports Special Studies P23–195.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    U. S. General Accounting Office. (2002). Immigration benefit fraud: Focused approach is need to address problems. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Van Vechten, C. C. (1941). Criminality of the foreign born. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 32, 139–147.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Vélez, M., Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (2003). Structural inequality and homicide: an assessment of the Black–White gap in killings. Criminology, 41, 645–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Warne, F. J. (1913). The immigrant invasion. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Welch, M. (2002). Detained immigration laws and the expanding INS jail complex. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Welch, M. (2003). Ironies of social construction and the criminalization of immigrants. Crime, Law & Social Change, 39, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Yeager, M. G. (1996). Immigrants and criminality. Ottawa: Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, Government of Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Augustine Joseph Kposowa
    • 1
  • Michelle A. Adams
    • 2
  • Glenn T. Tsunokai
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyTulane UniversityRiversideUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyWestern Washington UniversityRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations